Abstract
Federal environmental law began with a plea: that agencies and other parties consider, and mitigate, the environmental impacts of their work. The task remains unfulfilled given the nature of those impacts: They feature system effects, nonlinear interactions, feedback loops, discontinuous and threshold dynamics, and uncertain boundaries. The administrative state has limited means to address them. It relies on artificial constructs to assess and respond to impacts, such as worst-case scenarios, reasonable foreseeability, and scales that are either inappropriately narrow (“linked” projects) or large and vague (“program-level”). Right-to-know laws share this shortcoming, a product of the disasters that led to their enactment and the laws to which they were appended. In place for a quarter century, the framework is under renewed scrutiny. Recent accidents reveal risks from new and repurposed infrastructure, and point to chemical listing, threshold, labeling, and other potential reforms. But these are incremental adjustments to a baseline approach to chemical risk that operates under longstanding temporal and spatial constraints. Right-to-know privileges annualized data and the state of knowledge shortly after a release beyond a facility boundary. These choices limit data available for emergency response, particularly when chemical processing, oil and gas production, and other infrastructure are placed under stress. To explore how right-to-know laws can better account for system effects, I focus not on the black swan events or worst-case scenarios that shape new legislation and consume an outsized portion of administrative resources, but rather on increasingly common, geographically dispersed, and temporally discontinuous infrastructure stressors known as natechs. A natech event occurs when a natural hazard such as a storm, earthquake, or flood triggers technological accidents that result in the release of chemical agents into the environment. Natechs share several traits, including simultaneous releases, cascading and domino effects, and scattered or inaccessible infrastructure. They often occur under “best case” conditions, due to the weakness of the natural hazard trigger or the readiness of infrastructure in its path. They lead to non-state responses that identify, reconstruct, and track cumulative impacts that would be lost to regularized reporting at discrete scales. These non-state responses ensure situational awareness in emergent spaces, irrespective of facility boundary. And they suggest event sequences that can be leveraged for hazard mitigation. By focusing on a growing inventory of mundane infrastructure stressors, natechs can serve as proxies for some of the cumulative, delayed, distributed, and nonlinear impacts that environmental laws find difficult to address.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
29 C.F.R. § 1910.1200(g)(8)
40 C.F.R. § 70.6(a)(3)(iii)(B), 70.6(g)(3)(iv)
40 C.F.R. § 122.41(I)(6)
42 U.S.C. § 7404
42 U.S.C. § 7412(r)
42 U.S.C. § 9603(a)
42 U.S.C. § 11001
42 U.S.C. § 11002(a)(2)
42 U.S.C. § 11003
42 U.S.C. § 11004
42 U.S.C. § 11004(a)
42 U.S.C. § 11004(a)–(b)
42 U.S.C. § 11004(a)(1), (a)(2)(B), (b)(1)
42 U.S.C. § 11004(b)(1)
42 U.S.C. § 11004(b)(2)
42 U.S.C. § 11004(c)
42 U.S.C. §§ 11021-11022
42 U.S.C. § 11021(a)(1)
42 U.S.C. § 11021(a)(3)
42 U.S.C. § 11022
42 U.S.C. § 11022(a)(3)
42 U.S.C. § 11023(b)(1)(A)
42 U.S.C. § 11023(F)(1)(A)
42 U.S.C. § 11049(4)
49 C.F.R. § 171.15(a)
Aagaard T (2014) Environmental law outside the canon. Indiana Law J 89:1239
Abrams R, Ward D (1990) Prospects for safer communities: emergency response, community right to know, and prevention of chemical accidents. Harv Environ Law Rev 14(1):135–188
Adgate J, Goldstein B, McKenzie L (2014) Potential public health hazards, exposures, and health effects from unconventional natural gas development. Environ Sci Tech 48(15):8307–8320
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (2010) Health consultation: public health implications of ambient air exposures as measured in rural and urban oil and gas development areas. Atlanta, GA
Antonioni G, Bonvinici S, Spadoni V (2009) Development of a framework for the risk assessment of Natech accidental events. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 4(9):1442–1450
Babcock H (2007) National security and environmental laws: a clear and present danger? Virginia Environ Law J 25:105–159
Bachand T (2014) Keystone mapping project. http://keystone.steamingmules.com. Accessed 22 Dec 2014
Bardach E, Pugliaresi L (1977) The environmental impact statement vs. the real world. Public Interest 49:22–38
Belke J, Dietrich D (2005) The post-Bhopal and post-9/11 transformations in chemical emergency prevention and response policy in the United States. J Loss Prev Process Ind 18(4):375–379
Buzbee W (2003) Recognizing the regulatory commons: a theory of regulatory gaps. Iowa Law Rev 89:1
CalARP Program Seismic Guidance Committee (2014) Guidance for California Accidental Release Prevention (CalARP) Program seismic assessments. http://www.caloes.ca.gov/HazardousMaterials/Pages/California-Accidental-Release-Prevention-(CalARP).aspx. Accessed 30 Dec 2014
Coglianese C, Zeckhauser R, Parson E (2004) Seeking truth for power: informational strategy and regulatory policymaking. Minn Law Rev 89:277
Colborn T (2011) Natural gas operations from a public health perspective. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 17(5):1039–1056
Colborn T, Schultz K, Herrick L et al (2013) An exploratory study of air quality near natural gas operations. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 20(1):86–105
Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (2014) A staff report to the Commissioners: lessons learned in the Front Range Flood of September 2013. COGCC, Denver, CO
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (1980), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601–9675
Connors J, Lei S, Kelly M (2012) Citizen science in the age of neogeography: utilizing volunteered geographic information for environmental monitoring. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 102(6):1267–1289
Cooper WJ (2014) Responding to crisis: the West Virginia chemical spill. Environ Sci Tech 48(6):3095–3095
Corona Environmental Consulting, LLC (2014) WV TAP final report. Scituate, MA
Cozzani V, Campedel M, Renni E (2010) Industrial accidents triggered by flood events: analysis of past accidents. J Hazard Mater 175(1):501–509
Cruz A, Krausmann E (2009) Hazardous-materials releases from offshore oil and gas facilities and emergency response following Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. J Loss Prev Process Ind 22(1):59–65
Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (1986) Pub. Law No. 99-499, 100 Stat. 1728 (codified at 42 U.S.C. §§ 11011–11050)
Environmental Protection Agency (1999) Enforcement response policy for sections 304, 311, and 312 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act and section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act. Office of Regulatory Enforcement, Washington, DC
EPCRA § 313, 42 U.S.C. § 11023
FracTracker Alliance (2013a) FracTracker alliance annual report. Camp Hill, PA. http://www.fractracker.org/about-us/annual-report. Accessed 22 Dec 2014
FracTracker Alliance (2013b) USGS stream gages helpful in monitoring risks in shale-gas extraction regions. Camp Hill, PA. http://www.fractracker.org/2013/10/usgs-stream-monitoring. Accessed 29 Dec 2014
Frittelli J, Parfomak P, Ramseur J et al (2014) U.S. rail transportation of crude oil: background and issues for congress. Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC
Frost L, Ramesh D (2013) Texas fertilizer disaster raises safety, regulatory concerns. Chem Week 175:11 (22 Apr 2013)
Fung A, O’Rourke D (2000) Reinventing environmental regulation from the grassroots up: explaining and expanding the success of the Toxics Release Inventory. Environ Manage 25(2):115–127
Gosman S (2013) Reflecting risk: chemical disclosure and hydraulic fracturing. Georgia Law Rev 48(1):83
Gulf Monitoring Consortium (2012) Lessons from Hurricane Isaac: Gulf Coast coal and petrochemical facilities still not storm ready. Gulf Monitoring Consortium, Shepherdstown, WV
Hurricane Isaac Batters Gulf Coast Industry (2012) Chem Eng 10:25
Interview with Executive Director, Fractivist, in Fort Collins, Colorado (2 May 2014)
Interview with former Environmental Protection Agency official, in Denver, CO (3 Apr 2014)
Kaelin D (2014) Process safety: a need for change. Chem Eng Today 2014(5):38
Karkkainen B (2001) Information as environmental regulation: TRI and performance benchmarking, precursor to a new paradigm? Geophys J Roy Astron Soc 89:257
Karkkainen B (2002) Toward a smarter NEPA: monitoring and managing government’s environmental performance. Columbia Law Rev 102:903–972
Karkkainen B (2003) Adaptive ecosystem management and regulatory defaults: toward a bounded pragmatism. Minn Law Rev 87:943
Krausmann E, Cozzani V, Salzano E et al (2011) Industrial accidents triggered by natural hazards: an emerging issue. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 11(3):921–929
Krausmann E, Cruz A (2013) Impact of the 11 March 2011, Great East Japan earthquake and tsunami on the chemical industry. Nat Hazards 67(2):811–828
Kurgan L (2013) Close up at a distance: mapping, technology, and politics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Lindell M, Perry R (1997) Hazardous materials releases in the Northridge earthquake: implications for seismic risk assessment. Risk Anal 17(2):147–156
Louisiana Bucket Brigade (2012) iWitness pollution map – Stolthaven chemical plant tanks and tank cars compromised during Hurricane Isaac. http://map.labucketbrigade.org/reports/view/7616. Accessed 29 Dec 2014
Louisiana Environmental Action Network (2012) Environmental impacts from Hurricane Isaac. http://leanweb.org/our-work/community/environmental-impacts-from-hurricane-isaac. Accessed 29 Dec 2014
Manuel J (2014) Crisis and emergency risk communication: lessons from the Elk River spill. Environ Health Perspect 122(8):A214–A219
McFeeley M (2014) Falling through the cracks: public information and the patchwork of hydraulic fracturing disclosure laws. Vermont Law Rev 38:849–901
McKenzie L, Witter R, Newman L et al (2012) Human health risk assessment of air emissions from development of unconventional natural gas resources. Sci Total Environ 424:79–87
Merrill T, Schizer D (2013) The shale oil and gas revolution, hydraulic fracturing, and water contamination: a regulatory strategy. Minn Law Rev 98:145
Michanowicz D, Malone S, Kelso M et al (2012) A participatory geographic information system utilizing the GeoWeb 2.0. Syst Cybern Inf 10:45
Misrach R, Orff K (2013) Petrochemical America. Aperture, New York
Moore C, Zielinska B, Petron G et al (2014) Air impacts of increased natural gas acquisition, processing, and use: a critical review. Environ Sci Tech 48(5):8349–8359
National Diet of Japan (2012) The official report of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission. The National Diet of Japan, Tokyo
Nicholson B (2014) Regulatory complexity governs rail, truck oil field transportation. Oil Gas J 112(1):88–93
Perrow C (1999) Normal accidents: living with high-risk technologies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Reitze A (2005) Emergency response and planning requirements applicable to unpermitted air pollution releases. BYU Law Rev 2005(1075):1115
Reynolds D (2013a) EPA eyes local groups for improving plant safety, skirting IST debate. Inside EPA Environmental Protection Alert (2 Apr 2014)
Reynolds D (2013b) Obama order may boost bid for stricter EPA fertilizer, plant safety rules. Inside EPA Toxics Regulation News (7 Aug 2013)
Roesler S (2012) The nature of the environmental right to know. Ecol Law Q 39:989
Samuels R (2013) 3.11: Disaster and change in Japan. Cornell University Press, Ithaca
Schierow L (2004) Chemical plant security: CRS report to congress. Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC
Scorecard: The Pollution Information Site (2011) Goodguide, Berkeley, CA. http://scorecard.goodguide.com/general/tri/tri_gen.html. Accessed 27 Dec 2014
Sengul H, Santella N, Steinberg L et al (2012) Analysis of hazardous material releases due to natural hazards in the United States. Disasters 36(4):723–743
Shonkoff S, Hays J, Finkel M (2014) Environmental public health dimensions of shale and tight gas development. Environ Health Perspect 122(8):787
Showalter P, Myers M (1994) Natural disasters in the United States as release agents of oil, chemical, or radiological materials between 1980–1999: analysis and recommendations. Risk Anal 14(2):169–182
SkyTruth (2013) SkyTruth launches map to track oil and gas pollution from Colorado floods. SkyTruth, Shepherdstown, WV. http://blog.skytruth.org/2013/09/colorado-flood-map.html. Accessed 29 Dec 2014
SkyTruth (2014a) About SkyTruth. SkyTruth, Shepherdstown, WV. http://skytruth.org/about. Accessed 22 Dec 2014
SkyTruth (2014b) FrackFinder. SkyTruth, Shepherdstown, WV. http://frack.skytruth.org/frackfinder. Accessed 22 Dec 2014
SkyTruth (2014c) SkyTruth alerts. SkyTruth, Shepherdstown, WV. http://alerts.skytruth.org. Accessed 22 Dec 2014
Steinberg L, Cruz A (2004) When natural, technological disasters collide: lessons from the Turkey earthquake of August 17, 1999. Nat Hazards Rev 5(3):121–130
Steinberg L, Sengul H, Cruz A (2008) Natech risk and management: an assessment of the state of the art. Nat Hazards 46(2):143–152
Sylie S, Albright L (2014) WellWatch: reflections on designing digital media for multi-sited para-ethnography. J Polit Ecol 21(1):321–348
Tierney K (2007) From the margins to the mainstream? Disaster research at the crossroads. Ann Rev Soc 33:503–525
U.S. Chemical Safety Board (2014) Preliminary findings of the U.S. Chemical Safety Board from its investigation of the West fertilizer explosion and fire. Chemical Safety Board, Washington, DC (22 Apr. 2014)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2004) General guidance for risk management program for chemical accident prevention. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2013) RMP offsite consequence analysis guidance. http://www2.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2013-11/documents/chap-04-final.pdf. Accessed 30 Dec 2014
U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs (2006) Hurricane Katrina: a nation still unprepared: special report. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
Van den Burg S (2004) Informing or empowering? Disclosure in the United States and the Netherlands. Local Environ 9(4):367–381
Weeks J (2014) Regulating toxic chemicals: do hazardous substances need stricter oversight? CQ Res 24(26):603
Young S, Balluz L, Malilay J (2004) Natural and technological hazardous material releases during and after natural disasters: a review. Sci Total Environ 322(1):3–20
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Macey, G.P. (2016). The Natech: Right-to-Know as Space-Time Puzzle. In: Gardoni, P., Murphy, C., Rowell, A. (eds) Risk Analysis of Natural Hazards. Risk, Governance and Society, vol 19. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22126-7_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22126-7_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-22125-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-22126-7
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)