Skip to main content

Conclusion: Arithmetism Versus Logicism or Kronecker Contra Frege

  • Chapter
  • 907 Accesses

Part of the book series: Studies in Universal Logic ((SUL))

Abstract

I understand arithmetical philosophy on the model of Russell’s mathematical philosophy as an internal examination of arithmetical concepts—in the case of Russell, the internal examination of logical and general mathematical concepts (Russell 1919). From the mathematical point of view, Kronecker’s general arithmetic could be seen as a successor to Newton’s Arithmetica Universalis in the sense that both Newton and Kronecker wanted to integrate algebra into a general or universal arithmetic. The two texts “On the concept of number” (Kronecker 1887a,b) and his last lectures in Berlin “On the concept of number in mathematics” (see the German text edited by Boniface and Schappacher 2001) summarize Kronecker’s conception of number or whole number (integer).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Kronecker does not reject all of Hegel and he quotes him approvingly on certain occasions, but he has not taken Hegel’s conception of number seriously. One should mention however that contemporary mathematicians, like Lawvere in category theory, logicians in non-standard analysis and philosophers of logic (dialetheism and paraconsistent logic) have tried to make good of some of Hegel’s ideas.

References

  • M. Agrawal, N. Kayal and N. Saxena (2004): PRIMES is in P. Annals of Mathematics, 160:781–793.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • J. Boniface and N. Schappacher (2001): Sur le concept de nombre en mathématique. Cours inédit de Leopold Kronecker à Berlin en 1891. Revue d’histoire des mathématiques, 7:207–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. Gauthier (2002): Internal Logic. Foundations of Mathematics from Kronecker to Hilbert. Kluwer, Synthese Library, Dordrecht/Boston/London.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • A. Granville and T.J. Tucker (2002): It’s as Easy as ABC. Notices of the AMS, 1224–1231.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Hilbert (1935): Gesammelte Abhandlungen 3 vols. Chelsea, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Kronecker (1886): Zur Theorie der elliptischen Funktionen. Werke, IV:309–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Kronecker (1887a): Ein Fundamentalsatz der allgemeinen Arithmetik. Werke, II:211–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Kronecker (1887b): Über den Zahlbegriff. Werke, III:251–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Kronecker (1901): Vorlesungen über Zahlentheorie I. K. Hensel, ed. Teubner, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Russell (1919): Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy. Allen and Unwin, London, UK.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gauthier, Y. (2015). Conclusion: Arithmetism Versus Logicism or Kronecker Contra Frege. In: Towards an Arithmetical Logic. Studies in Universal Logic. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22087-1_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics