Skip to main content

“Just Don’t Get Up There and ‘Dangerous Minds’ Us”: Taking an Inquiry Stance on Adolescents’ Literacy Practices in Urban Teacher Education

  • Chapter
  • 1976 Accesses

Part of the book series: Education, Equity, Economy ((EEEC,volume 2))

Abstract

Teacher candidates assumptions about urban students shape their expectations and approaches to teaching them . In this chapter I document how a community of teacher candidates learned about teaching English in urban high schools through investigating adolescent literacies with their students. Beginning with an examination of the social construction of “risk,” I analyze teacher candidates’ inquiries into urban adolescents’ literacy practices and the cultural and linguistic resources they bring to classrooms. Findings suggest how a critical inquiry stance encouraged individuals to interrupt deficit perspectives and “risk-laden discourses” (Vasudevan and Campano, Rev Res Educ 33(1):310–353, 2009). This informed counter discourses about the talents and capabilities of urban students that provided a basis for developing more culturally relevant and relational approaches to teaching them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    All names of teachers, students, and schools are pseudonyms.

References

  • Alvermann, D. (2007). Multiliterate youth in the time of scientific reading instruction. In K. Beers, R. Probst, & L. Rief (Eds.), Adolescent literacy: Turning promise into practice (pp. 19–26). Portsmouth: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bomer, R., Dworen, J., May, L., & Semingson, P. (2008). Miseducating teachers about the poor: A critical analysis of Ruby Payne’s claims about poverty. Teachers College Record, 110(12), 2497–2531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britzman, D. P. (1999). Cultural myths in the making of a teacher: Biography and social structure in teacher education. In E. Mintz & J. T. Yun (Eds.), The complex world of teaching: Perspectives from theory and practice, (pp. 179–192). Harvard Educational Review Reprint Series No. 31 (Reprinted from Harvard Educational Review, 56(4), 442–456.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Campano, G., Ghiso, M. P., & Sánchez, L. (2013). “Nobody one knows the…amount of a person”: Elementary students critiquing dehumanization through organic critical literacies. Research in the Teaching of English, 48(1), 97–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, L. M. (1999). Critical literacy: Teaching reading, writing, and outrage. In C. Edelsky (Ed.), Making justice our project: Teachers working towards critical whole language practice (pp. 53–67). Urbana: NCTE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, M., & Socolar, P. (2005). In a highly segregated system, many racial gaps: New District data reveal persistent inequities in resources and achievement. The Notebook, 12(4). http://thenotebook.org/summer-2005/05659/highly-segregated-system-many-racial-gaps. Accessed 2 Sept 2014.

  • Cochran-Smith, M. (2004). Walking the road: Race, diversity and social justice in teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2001). Beyond certainty: Taking an inquiry stance on practice. In A. Leiberman & L. Miller (Eds.), Teachers caught in the action: Professional development that matters. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research in the next generation. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., Piazza, P., & Power, C. (2013). The politics of accountability: Assessing teacher education in the United States. The Educational Forum, 77(1), 6–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., & Sykes, G. (2003). Wanted: A national teacher supply policy for education: The right way to meet the “Highly Qualified Teacher” challenge. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(33). http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n33/. Accessed 5 Sept 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickar, M. (2004). Words is changin’ every day: Language and literacy in the urban contact zone. In B. R. C. Barrell, R. F. Hammett, J. S. Mayher, & G. M. Pradl (Eds.), Teaching English today: Advocating change in the secondary curriculum (pp. 68–80). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, M. (1991). Framing dropouts: Notes on the politics of an urban high school. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, M. (2007). Writing in rhythm: Spoken word poetry in urban classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1987). The importance of the act of reading. In P. Freire & D. Macedo (Eds.), Literacy: Reading the word and the world (pp. 29–36). South Hadley: Bergin and Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadsden, V. L., Davis, J. E., & Artiles, A. J. (2009). Introduction: Risk, equity, and schooling: Transforming the discourse. Review of Research in Education, 33(1), viii–xi.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2001). What is literacy? In P. Shannon (Ed.), Becoming political, too: New readings and writings on the politics of literacy education (pp. 1–9). Portsmouth: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haberman, M. (1991). The pedagogy of poverty versus good teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(4), 290–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, G., & Katz, M. L. (2006). Crafting an agentive self: Case studies of digital storytelling. Research in the Teaching of English, 41(1), 43–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janks, H. (2010). Literacy and power. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jocson, K. (2013). Remix revisited: Critical solidarity in youth media arts. E-learning and Digital Media, 10(1), 68–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, J. R., & O’Brian, D. G. (2002). Adolescents’ multiliteracies and their teachers’ needs to know: Toward a digital détente. In D. Alvermann (Ed.), Adolescents and literacies in a digital world (pp. 40–50). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutz, E., & Roskelly, H. (1991). An unquiet pedagogy: Transforming practice in the English classroom. Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladson-Billings, G. (1992). Reading between the lines and beyond the pages: A culturally relevant approach to literacy teaching. Theory into Practice, 31(4), 313–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewison, M., Leland, C., & Harste, J. (2008). Creating critical classrooms: K-8 reading and writing with an edge. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahiri, J. (2004). What they don’t learn in school: Literacy in the lives of urban youth. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marvel, J., Lyter, D. M., Peltola, P., Strizek, G. A., & Morton, B. A. (2007). Teacher attrition and mobility: Results from the 2004–05 teacher follow-up survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moje, E. J., Overby, M., Tysvaer, N., & Morris, K. (2008). The complex world of adolescent literacy: Myths, motivations, and mysteries. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrell, E. (2007). Critical literacy and popular culture in urban education: Toward a pedagogy of access and dissent. In C. Clark & M. Blackburn (Eds.), Working with/in the local: New directions in literacy research for political action (pp. 235–254). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Endowment for the Arts (NEA). (2004). Reading at risk: A survey of literary reading in America (Research division report #46). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Endowment for the Arts (NEA). (2007). To read or not to read: A question of national consequence (Research report #47). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Endowment for the Arts (NEA). (2009). Reading on the rise: A new chapter in American literacy. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieto, S. (1999). The light in their eyes: Creating multicultural learning communities. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieto, S. (2003). Challenging current notions of “highly qualified teachers” through work in a teachers’ inquiry group. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(5), 386–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl, K., & Rowsell, J. (2012). Literacy and education: The new literacy studies in the classroom (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pleasants, H., & Salter, D. (2014). Community-based multiliteracies and digital media projects: Questioning assumptions and exploring realities. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, M. L. (1991). Arts of the contact zone. Profession, 91, 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, R. (2012). “Without comic books there would be no me”: Teachers as connoisseurs of adolescents’ literate lives. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 55(6), 516–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, R., Campano, G., Broderick, D., & Pantoja, A. (2012). Practitioner research and literacy studies: Toward more dialogic methodologies. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 11(2), 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, D., & Bruckheimer, J. (Producers), & Smith, J. N. (Director). (1995). Dangerous minds [Motion Picture]. Hollywood: Buena Vista.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, B. V. (1995). Social literacies: Critical approaches to literacy in development, ethnography, and education. Harlow: Pearson Education Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, B. V. (2005). Literacies across educational contexts. Philadelphia: Caslon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatum, A. (2008). Toward a more anatomically complete model of literacy instruction: A focus on African American adolescents and texts. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 155–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasudevan, L. (2006/2007). Looking for angels: Knowing adolescents by engaging with their multimodal literacy practices. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 50(4), 252–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasudevan, L., & Campano, G. (2009). The social production of adolescent risk and the promise of adolescent literacies. Review of Research in Education, 33(1), 310–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, A. I. (1997). Focus on research: Historical considerations. Language Arts, 74(5), 387–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoss, M., Holbrook, T., McGrail, E., & Albers, P. (2014). Knotty articulations: Professors and preservice teachers on teaching literacy in urban schools. English Education, 47(1), 38–79.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rob Simon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Simon, R. (2016). “Just Don’t Get Up There and ‘Dangerous Minds’ Us”: Taking an Inquiry Stance on Adolescents’ Literacy Practices in Urban Teacher Education. In: Lampert, J., Burnett, B. (eds) Teacher Education for High Poverty Schools. Education, Equity, Economy, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22059-8_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22059-8_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-22058-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-22059-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics