Skip to main content

Do We Need a Revolutionary Approach to Bring Creativity into Education?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Creative Contradictions in Education

Part of the book series: Creativity Theory and Action in Education ((CTAE,volume 1))

Abstract

What would it take to build an educational system that truly integrated creativity into the core of its processes? In this chapter, we will explore two different approaches to changing the system. We will look at the idea of an educational revolution, and, in particular, the trajectory of the Quiet Revolution that Torrance EP, Goff K (1989) J Creat Behav 23(2):136–145 discussed in their paper of the same name. In contrast, we will look at what the theory of evolution might tell us about changing a system through a more gradual process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adobe. (2014, September). Seeking creative candidates: Hiring for the future. Retrieved from: http://wwwimages.adobe.com/content/dam/Adobe/en/education/pdfs/creative-candidates-study-0914.pdf

  • Amabile, T. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beghetto, R. A. (2010). Creativity in the classroom. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 447–463). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Beghetto, R. A., Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2014). Teaching for creativity in the common core classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design issues, 8(2), 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, C., & Figliotti, J. (2015). Weaving creativity into every strand of your curriculum. Buffalo, NY: Knowinnovation Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retentions in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67(6), 380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catalana, S. M. (in press). Lessons with no conclusions: Using the incubation model of teaching and learning to break barriers in the classroom. Torrance Journal of Applied Creativity, 1(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramond, B. (2013). The life and contributions of E. Paul Torrance. In E. Romey (Ed.), Finding John Galt: People, politics, and practice in gifted education (pp. 25–31). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramond, B., Matthews-Morgan, J., Bandalos, D., & Zuo, L. (2005). A report on the 40-year follow-up of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Alive and well in the new millennium. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(4), 283–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, C. (1993). The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia approach to early childhood education. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, K. R., The Committee on Communications, & The Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health. (2007). The importance of play in promoting healthy child development and maintaining strong parent–child bonds. Pediatrics, 119, 182–191. doi:10.1542/peds.2006-2697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, P. (1993). Engaging students’ intellects: The immersion approach to critical thinking in psychology instruction. Teaching of Psychology, 20, 68–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, P. (2013). Free to learn. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, P., & Chanoff, D. (1986). Democratic schooling: What happens to young people who have charge of their own education? American Journal of Education, 94, 182–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, P., & Feldman, J. (1997). Patterns of age mixing and gender mixing among children and adolescents at an ungraded democratic school. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 43, 67–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haydon, K. P. (2015). What if we view our education system as an ecosystem? In M. K. Culpepper & C. Burnett (Eds.), Big questions in creativity 2015. Buffalo, NY: ICSC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hung, W., Jonassen, D. H., & Liu, R. (2008). Problem-based learning. Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 3, 485–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, J. (2012). Reflections on a half-century of school reform: Why have we fallen short and where do we go from here? Retrieved from http://www.cep-dc.org/cfcontent_file.cfm?Attachment=Jennings%5FPaper%5FReflections%5F1%2E27%2E12%2Epdf

  • Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2013). In praise of Clark Kent: Creative metacognition and the importance of teaching kids when (not) to be creative. Roeper Review, 35(3), 155–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller-Mathers, S. (In press). The curious classroom: Weaving creativity into content with TIM. Buffalo, NY: ICSC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K. H. (2011). The creativity crisis: The decrease in creative thinking scores on the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 23(4), 285–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtman, G. (2014). #EdJourney: A roadmap to the future of education. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longo, C. (2010). Fostering creativity or teaching to the test? Implications of state testing on the delivery of science instruction. The Clearing House, 83, 54–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClure, P. (2005). Where standards come from. Theory Into Practice, 44(1), 4–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, E., & Almon, J. (2009). Crisis in the kindergarten: Why children need to play in school. Retrieved from http://www.allianceforchildhood.org/sites/allianceforchildhood.org/files/file/kindergarten_report.pdf

  • Murdock, M., & Keller-Mathers, S. (2002, Fall). Teaching for creativity: Where there’s a will, there’s a way. National Association of Gifted Children Celebrate Creativity Newsletter, 13(2), 3, 4, 10–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, M., & Keller-Mathers, S. (2008). Teaching and learning creatively with the Torrance Incubation Model: A research and practice update. International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving, 18(2), 11–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center on Education and the Economy. (2008). Tough choices or tough times: The report of the new commission on the skills of the American workforce. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2008). 21st Century skills, education and competitiveness: A resource and policy guide. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/21st_century_skills_education_and_competitiveness_guide.pdf

  • Piirto, J. (2014). Organic creativity in the classroom: Teaching to intuition in academics and the arts. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan, 42(7), 305–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R. (2010). Everyday creativity: Process and way of life – Four key issues. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 189–215). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 92–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, C. L. (1999). Teachers’ biases toward creative children. Creativity Research Journal, 12(4), 321–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1998). Donald Campbell’s model of the creative process: Creativity as blind variation and selective retention. Journal of Creative Behavior, 32, 153–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1999). Creativity as blind variation and selective retention: Is the creative process Darwinian? Psychological Inquiry, 10(4), 309–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (2011). Creativity and discovery as blind variation: Campbell’s (1960) BVSR model after the half-century mark. Review of General Psychology, 15(2), 158–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smutny, J. F. (Ed.). (2009). Igniting creativity in gifted learners, K-6. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smutny, J. F., Walker, S. Y., & Honeck, E. I. (2016). Teaching gifted children in today’s preschool and primary classrooms: Identifying, nurturing, and challenging children ages 4–9. Minneapolis, MN: Free Spirit Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. I. (1953). Creativity and culture. Journal of Psychology, 36, 31–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1959). Current research on the nature of creative talent. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 6(4), 309–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1979a). An instructional model for enhancing incubation. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 13(1), 23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1979b). The search for satori and creativity. Buffalo, NY: Creative Education Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P., & Goff, K. (1989). A quiet revolution. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 23(2), 136–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P., & Safter, H. T. (1990). The incubation model of teaching. Buffalo, NY: Bearly Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P., & Safter, H. T. (1999). Making the creative leap beyond. Buffalo, NY: Creative Education Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P., & Sisk, D. A. (1997). Gifted and talented children in the regular classroom. Buffalo, NY: Creative Education Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westby, E. L., & Dawson, V. L. (1995). Creativity: Asset or burden in the classroom? Creativity Research Journal, 8(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cynthia A. Burnett .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Burnett, C.A., Haydon, K.P. (2017). Do We Need a Revolutionary Approach to Bring Creativity into Education?. In: Beghetto, R., Sriraman, B. (eds) Creative Contradictions in Education. Creativity Theory and Action in Education, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21924-0_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21924-0_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21923-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-21924-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics