Abstract
This chapter reports the case of the merger between two universities of applied sciences in Finland. The official merger process started in the beginning of the year 2008 and eventually merged on 1st January 2010. It is expected that the merger will enhance both the internationalization capacity and market attractiveness. Following an analytical framework of merger process, we will discuss how the decision of the merger was made and how the merger was implemented along three distinct stages, namely: planning: integration; and outcomes. In the end, it concludes that the merger was relatively successful and provide implications of the case for policy makers and institutional managers when planning and operating mergers.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Finland has binary higher education system, including research universities and vocationally- and professionally-oriented higher education institutions. The official name of the latter is called ammattikorkeakoulu. Although Finnish institutions translate their names in English as Universities of Applied Sciences, in the English versions of Finnish governmental documents (e.g. the Polytechnics Act and the Finnish Ministry of Education and Culture’s websites), this type of institutions are called polytechnics. Nevertheless, the translation university of applied sciences is nowadays widely used in Austria, Finland, Germany and Netherlands, albeit the term has been a conversation piece (de Lourdes Machado et al. 2008).
References
Aarrevaara, T., Dobson, I., & Elander, C. (2009). Brave new world: Higher education reform in Finland. Higher Education Management and Policy, 21/2, 89–106.
Cai, Y. (2007). Academic staff integration in post-merger Chinese higher education institutions. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
Curri, G. (2002). Reality versus perception: Restructuring tertiary education and institutional organizational change – A case study. Higher Education, 44(1), 133–151.
Currie, J., & Newson, J. A. (1998). Universities and globalization: Critical perspectives. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
De Lourdes Machado, M., Ferreira, J. B., Santiago, R., & Taylor, J. S. (2008). Reframing the non-university sector in Europe: Convergence or diversity? In J. Taylor, F. J. Brites, M. De Lourdes Machado, & R. Santiago (Eds.), Non-university higher education in Europe (pp. 245–260). Dordrecht/Milton Keynes: Springer.
Eastman, J., & Lang, D. W. (2001). Mergers in higher education: Lessons from theory and experience. Toronto: University of Toronto.
Entäs ny? Muutosviestintää sarjakuvan keinoin PIRAMK ja TAMK (2009–2010) [What about now? Change communication through cartoons. PIRAMK and TAMK 2009–2010] Tampereen ammattikorkeakoulun julkaisuja. Sarja B. raportteja 46. Tampere 2011.
Ernst & Young. (2008). PIRAMK – TAMK Yhdistymistapaselvitys 27.5.2008 [PIRAMK – TAMK merger manner report 27.5.2008.]
Häihälä, E. (2005). Kohti uutta vuosituhatta. Pirkanmaan väliaikainen ammattikorkeakoulu 1.8.1997 – 31.7.2000. [Towards a new millennium. Temporary Pirkanmaa University of Applied Sciences 1.8.1997 – 31.7.2000.] Pirkanmaan ammattikorkeakoulun julkaisusarja A. Tutkimukset ja selvitykset. Nro 10. Tampere.
Harman, K. (2002). Merging divergent campus cultures into coherent educational communities: Challenges for higher education leaders. Higher Education, 44(1), 91–114.
Harman, G., & Harman, K. (2003). Institutional mergers in higher education: Lessons from international experience. Tertiary Education and Management, 9(1), 29–44.
Hatton, E. J. (2002). Charles Sturt University: A case study of institutional amalgamation. Higher Education, 44(1), 5–27.
Henkilöstötutkimukset 2009, 2011, 2012 ja 2013. Tampereen ammattikorkeakoulu. Innolink research. [Staff surveys 2009, 2011, 2012 and 2013. Tampere University of Applied Sciences.]
Kosonen, J., Miettinen, T., Sutela, M., & Turtiainen, M. (2015). Ammattikorkeakoululaki [Polytechnics Act]. Helsinki: Kauppakamari.
Kyvik, S. (2002). The merger of non-university colleges in Norway. Higher Education, 44(1), 53–72.
Lang, D. W. (2002). There are mergers, and there are mergers: The forms of inter-institutional combination. Higher Education Management and Policy, 14(1), 11–50.
Marginson, S. (2006). Dynamics of national and global competition in higher education. Higher Education, 52(1), 1–39.
Martin, C. D. (1996). The involuntary push: University mergers and their effect on post-graduate management education in South Australia. Journal of Educational Administration, 34(3), 83–91.
Martin, J., & Samels, J. E. (1994). Merging colleges for mutual growth: A new strategy for academic managers. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Mildred, G. (2002). Launching the united national system: What happened in South Australia. Higher Education, 44(1), 29–51.
Narikka, J., & Nurmi, E. (2013). Uudet yliopistot ja uudistuvat ammattikorkeakoulut [New Universities and Renewed Universities of Applied Sciences]. Tallinna: Tietosanoma Oy.
Norgård, J. D., & Skodvin, O.-J. (2002). The importance of geography and culture in mergers: A Norwegian institutional case study. Higher Education, 44(1), 73–90.
Pick, D. (2003). Framing and frame shifting in a higher education merger. Tertiary Education and Management, 9(4), 299–316.
PIRAMK & TAMK Muutostilanteen henkilöstötutkimus 2010. Innolink research. [PIRAMK & TAMK Staff survey on the change situation 2010.]
Pirkanmaan ammattikorkeakoulun ja Tampereen ammattikorkeakoulun yhdistäminen yhdeksi ammattikorkeakouluksi. Tampereen pormestarin asettaman Yhdistämistyöryhmän selvitys. [Merger of Pirkanmaa University of Applied Sciences and Tampere University of Applied Sciences to one university of applied sciences. Report of the merger working group set by the mayor.] 30.9.2008.
Selvitys PIRAMKin ja TAMKin koulutustoiminnasta, T&K –toiminnasta sekä tukipalveluista, 2008 [Report on PIRAMK’s and TAMK’s education, R&D and support services, 2008]
Sipilä, J. (2008). Kahtena vai yhtenä – koulutuspoliittinen selvitys Pirkanmaan ja Tampereen ammattikorkeakoulujen yhdistämisestä [One or two – Education policy account on merger of Pirkanmaa and Tampere Universities of Applied Sciences.] Pirkanmaan ammattikorkeakoulun julkaisusarja A. Tutkimukset ja selvitykset. Nro 14. Tampere.
Skodvin, O.-J. (1999). Mergers in higher education – Success or failure? Tertiary Education and Management, 5(1), 65–80.
Uotila, V. (2008). Avoveteen, tuulta päin. Pirkanmaan ammattikorkeakoulu – PIRAMK 1.8.2000 – 31.7.2006 [To open water, towards the wind. Pirkanmaa University of Applied Sciences – PIRAMK 1.8.2000 – 31.7.2006] Pirkanmaan ammattikorkeakoulun julkaisusarja A. Tutkimukset ja selvitykset. Nro11. Jyväskylä.
Välähdyksiä – TAMK 10 vuotta [Flashes - TAMK 10 years] (Ed.) Kaisa Lahtinen. TAMKin julkaisusarja, erillisjulkaisut. Tampere 2006.
Wan, Y., & Peterson, M. W. (2007). A case study of a merger in Chinese higher education: The motives, processes, and outcomes. International Journal of Educational Development, 27(6), 683–696.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sutela, M., Cai, Y. (2016). Merger of Two Universities of Applied Sciences. In: Pinheiro, R., Geschwind, L., Aarrevaara, T. (eds) Mergers in Higher Education. Higher Education Dynamics, vol 46. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21918-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21918-9_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21917-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-21918-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)