Skip to main content

Testing and Development of Mitigation Systems for Tertiary Blast

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Blast Injury Science and Engineering

Abstract

A mitigation system may provide significant protection to occupants during under-vehicle explosions; however, no clearly defined way to evaluate them before use in theatre, currently exists. This chapter reviews a number of methods that have been used previously to assess mitigation systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Durocher R. Jowz valley mine strike preliminary technical report: investigation of a mine strike involving Canadian troops in Afghanistan. Valcartier: Defence Research and Development Canada; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wang J, Bird R, Swinton B, Krstic A. Protection of lower limbs against floor impact in army vehicles experiencing landmine explosion. J Battlef Technol. 2001;4:8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ramasamy A, Hill AM, Masouros SD, Gordon F, Clasper JC, Bull AMJ. Evaluating the effect of vehicle modification in reducing injuries from landmine blasts. An analysis of 2212 incidents and its application for humanitarian purposes. Accid Anal Prev. 2011;43:1878–86. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2011.04.030.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bird R. Protection of vehicles against landmines. J Battlefield Technol. 2001;4:14–7.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Newell N, Masouros SD, Pullen AD, Bull AMJ. The comparative behaviour of two combat boots under impact. Inj Prev. 2012;18:109–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Newell N, Masouros SD, Bull AMJ. A comparison of MiL-Lx and hybrid-III responses in seated and standing postures with blast mats in simulated under-vehicle explosions. In: Proceeding of the IRCOBI conference 2013, Gothenburg; 2013, p. 135–45.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Newell N, Masouros SD, Ramasamy M, Bonner TJ, Hill AM, Clasper JC, et al. Use of cadavers and anthropometric test devices (ATDs) for assessing lower limb injury outcome from under-vehicle explosions. In Proceeding of the IRCOBI conference 2012, Dublin; 2012, p. 296–303.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pandelani T. Evaluation of dynamic response characteristics of the MIL-Lx leg compared to the Thor-Lx leg. In: Proceeding of the CSIR Young Researcher Symposium 2011, Pretoria; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Quenneville CE, Dunning CE. Evaluation of the biofidelity of the HIII and MIL-Lx lower leg surrogates under axial impact loading. Traffic Inj Prev. 2011;13:81–5. doi:10.1080/15389588.2011.623251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Quenneville C, Dunning C. Evaluation of energy attenuating floor mats for protection of lower limbs from anti-vehicular landmines. In: Proceeding of the ASME 2011 Summer Bioengineering Conference, Farmington; 2011. p. 1031–2.

    Google Scholar 

  11. McKay BJ. Development of lower extremity injury criteria and biomechanical surrogate to evaluate military vehicle occupant injury during an explosive blast event. PhD Thesis. Wayne State University, Detroit; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Masouros SD, Newell N, Ramasamy A, Bonner TJ, West ATH, Hill AM, et al. Design of a traumatic injury simulator for assessing lower limb response to high loading rates. Ann Biomed Eng. 2013;41:1957–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. North Atlantic Treaty Organisation HFM-090 TG 25 2007. Test methodology for protection of vehicle occupants against anti-vehicular landmine and/or IED effects (HFM-090).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Manseau J, Keown M. Development of an assessment methodology for lower leg injuries resulting from anti-vehicular blast landmines. In: IUTAM symposium impact biomechanics from fundamental insights to application, vol. 124. Ireland: University College Dublin; 2005, p. 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dong L, Zhu F, Jin X, Suresh M, Jiang B, Sevagan G, et al. Blast effect on the lower extremities and its mitigation: a computational study. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2013;28:111–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Newell N, Masouros SD. A finite element model of the military lower extremity surrogate (MIL-Lx) with combat boot validated for high loading-rate inputs. Work. Numer. Anal. Hum. Surrog. Response to Accel. Load., Aberdeen; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolas Newell MEng, PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Newell, N., Masouros, S. (2016). Testing and Development of Mitigation Systems for Tertiary Blast. In: Bull, A., Clasper, J., Mahoney, P. (eds) Blast Injury Science and Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21867-0_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21867-0_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21866-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-21867-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics