Skip to main content

Energised Fragments, Bullets and Fragment Simulating Projectiles

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Blast Injury Science and Engineering

Abstract

The pattern of injuries sustained by soldiers is determined by the types of wounding agent, the tissues they penetrate and any methods of preventing that initial injury. In current conflicts the burden of injuries directly sustained from conflict far outweighs that sustained outside of battle or secondary to disease, in direct contrast to almost every conflict ever experienced in history prior to the twenty-first century. Throughout the history of warfare, penetrating injury has been the most common cause of death on the battlefield, with only a small proportion (4 %) of battle injuries from blunt trauma. Blunt trauma is commonly caused from the force of the explosive blast wave throwing the soldier against an object (the tertiary blast effect) [1]. Blunt injury due to interpersonal assault or road traffic accidents is responsible for most non battle injuries, with patterns reflective of that seen in civilian wounds. The term ‘ballistic wounds’ is loosely used in both popular culture as well as medicine to describe any injury due to firearm. In terms of potential wounding mechanisms produced in a military environment, ballistic injuries can be broadly divided into those from bullets and those from energised fragment producing munitions and devices [2–11] (Table 18.1). These injuries can be termed “secondary blast injuries”, following on the definitions in Chap. 6.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ramasamy A, Hill AM, Hepper AE, Bull AM, Clasper JC. Blast mines: physics, injury mechanisms and vehicle protection. J R Army Med Corps. 2009;155(4):258–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jackson DS, Batty CG, Ryan JM, McGregor WS. The Falklands war: army field surgical experience. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1983;65:281–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Hardaway RM. Viet Nam wound analysis. J Trauma. 1978;18:635–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Reister FA. Battle casualties and medical statistics: U.S. Army Experience in the Korean War. Washington, DC: The Surgeon General, Department of the Army; 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Beebe GW, DeBakey ME. Location of hits and wounds. In: Battle casualties. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas; 1952. p. 165–205.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Garfield RM, Neugut AI. Epidemiologic analysis of warfare. A historical review. JAMA. 1991;266(5):688–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Adamson PB. A comparison of ancient and modern weapons in the effectiveness of producing battle casualties. J R Army Med Corps. 1977;123:93–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Crew FAE. History of the second world war. The army medical services. London: H.M.S.O; 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Moffat WC. British forces casualties in Northern Ireland. J R Army Med Corps. 1976;112:3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rees D. Korea the limited war. London: Macmillan; 1964, pA60-1 Appendix C.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Carey ME. Analysis of wounds incurred by U.S. Army Seventh Corps personnel treated in Corps hospitals during Operation Desert Storm, February 20 to March 10, 1991. J Trauma. 1996;40(3 Suppl):S165–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Thurman JT editor. Practical bomb scene investigation. 2nd ed. London: Taylor & Francis; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kang DG, Lehman Jr RA, Carragee EJ. Wartime spine injuries: understanding the improvised explosive device and biophysics of blast trauma. Spine J. 2012;12(9):849–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McFate M. Iraq: the social context of IEDs. Milit Rev. 2005;25:37–40.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lucci EB. Chap. 65. Improvised explosive devices. In: Ciottone GR, editor. Disaster medicine. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Patel HD, Dryden S, Gupta A, Ang SC. Pattern and mechanism of traumatic limb amputations after explosive blast: experience from the 07/07/05 London terrorist bombings. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(1):276–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Holmes RH. Wound ballistics and body armor. J Am Med Assoc. 1952;150(2):73–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ryan JM, Cooper GJ, Haywood IR, Milner SM. Field surgery on a future conventional battlefield: strategy and wound management. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1991;73:13–20.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. NATO Standardisation Agreement (STANAG 2920): ballistic test method for personal armour materials and combat clothing, 2nd ed. NATO Standardisation Agency; 2003. http://www.nato.int/cps/en/SID-8BF0F167-D3248540/natolive/stanag.htm. Accessed 8 Aug 2014.

  20. Sullivan JF. Development of projectiles to be used in testing body armor, to simulate flak and 20 mm H.E. Fragments. Memorandum Report WAL 762/247. Watertown; 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Steier V, Carr DJ, Crawford C, Teagle M, Miller D, Holden S, Helliker M. Effect of FSP material on the penetration of a typical body armor fabric. In: Presented at the international symposium on ballistics 22–26 Sept 2014; Atlanta.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Breeze J, Leason J, Gibb I, Allanson-Bailey L, Hunt N, Hepper A, Spencer P, Clasper J. Characterisation of explosive fragments injuring the neck. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;51(8):e263–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Breeze J, James GR, Hepper AE. Perforation of fragment simulating projectiles into goat skin and muscle. J R Army Med Corps. 2013;159:84–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kieser DC, Carr DJ, Leclair SC, Horsfall I, Theis JC, Swain MV, Kieser JA. Clothing increases the risk of indirect ballistic fractures. J Orthop Surg Res. 2013;8:42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Carr DJ, Kieser J, Mabbott A, Mott C, Girvan E, Champion S. Damage to apparel layers and underlying tissue due to hand-gun bullets. Int J Legal Med. 2014;128:83–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Missliwetz J, Denk W, Wieser I. Study on the wound ballistics of fragmentation protective vests following penetration by handgun and assault rifle bullets. J Forensic Sci. 1995;40:582–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Knudsen PJT, Sørensen OH. The destabilising effect of body armour on military rifle bullets. Int J Legal Med. 1997;110:82–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Coupland R, Rothschild MA. Thali. In: Kneubuehl B, editor. Wound ballistics: basics and applications, 1st ed. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media; 2011. ISBN: 9783642203565.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bowyer GW. Management of small fragment wounds in modern warfare: a return to Hunterian principles? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1997;79(3):175–82.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Champion HR, Holcomb JB, Young LA. Injuries from explosions: physics, biophysics, pathology and required research focus. J Trauma. 2009;66:1468–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Galbraith KA. Combat casualties in the first decade of the 21st century – new and emerging weapon systems. J R Army Med Corps. 2001;147:7–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hill PF, Edwards DP, Bowyer GW. Small fragment wounds: biophysics, pathophysiology and principles of management. J R Army Med Corps. 2001;147(1):41–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Gurney RW. The initial velocities of fragments from bombs, shells and grenades. Ballistic Research Lab, Aberdeen Proving Ground Maryland; 1943. Available at: http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a800105.pdf.

  34. Bors D, Cummins J, Goodpaster J. The anatomy of a pipe bomb explosion: measuring the mass and velocity distributions of container fragments. J Forensic Sci. 2014;59(1):42–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Bors D, Cummins J, Goodpaster J. The anatomy of a pipe bomb explosion: the effect of explosive filler, container material and ambient temperature on device fragmentation. Forensic Sci Int. 2014;234:95–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Breeze .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Breeze, J., Carr, D.J. (2016). Energised Fragments, Bullets and Fragment Simulating Projectiles. In: Bull, A., Clasper, J., Mahoney, P. (eds) Blast Injury Science and Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21867-0_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21867-0_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21866-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-21867-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics