Skip to main content
  • 1414 Accesses

Abstract

The primary function of intraoperative consultation is to provide a tissue evaluation that is as accurate and prompt as possible and to effectively communicate the findings to the operating surgeon to guide subsequent surgical management of the patient. The primary goals of frozen section diagnosis include the evaluation of the presence of malignancy, tumor assessment of the primary site, histological type and grade, and assessment of the extent of local tumor invasion and distant metastasis.

However, there is no standardized practice for surgeons in requesting intraoperative consultation. Indications for frozen section evaluation vary significantly among institutions and even among gynecologic oncologists within the same institution. In principle, a request for intraoperative consultation is acceptable if a tissue sample is submitted with a question for an answer, upon which a real-time clinical decision has to be made for subsequent surgical or medical management of the patient. It is important that the frozen section will retain its relevance only in the context of broad clinical knowledge of the pathologist and judicious utilization by the surgeon, both in the ultimate service of the patient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Stout AP. Frozen section diagnosis in surgery. Surg Clin North Am. 1956;335–44.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kindschi GW. Frozen sections. Their use and abuse. JAMA. 1984;251:2559–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lechago J. The frozen section: pathology in the trenches. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005;129:1529–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gal AA, Cagle PT. The 100-year anniversary of the description of the frozen section procedure. JAMA. 2005;294:3135–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ackerman LV, Ramirez GA. The indications for and limitations of frozen section diagnosis; a review of 1269 consecutive frozen section diagnoses. Br J Surg. 1959;46:336–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Taxy JB. Frozen section and the surgical pathologist: a point of view. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009;133:1135–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Novis DA, Gephardt GN, Zarbo RJ. Interinstitutional comparison of frozen section consultation in small hospitals: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 18,532 frozen section consultation diagnoses in 233 small hospitals. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1996;120:1087–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Howanitz PJ, Hoffman GG, Zarbo RJ. The accuracy of frozen-section diagnoses in 34 hospitals. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1990;114:355–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gephardt GN, Zarbo RJ. Interinstitutional comparison of frozen section consultations. A college of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 90,538 cases in 461 institutions. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1996;120:804–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Stephan JM, Hansen J, Samuelson M, McDonald M, Chin Y, Bender D, et al. Intra-operative frozen section results reliably predict final pathology in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;133:499–505.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Karabagli P, Ugras S, Yilmaz BS, Celik C. The evaluation of reliability and contribution of frozen section pathology to staging endometrioid adenocarcinomas. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;292(2):391–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Turan T, Oguz E, Unlubilgin E, Tulunay G, Boran N, Demir OF, Kose MF. Accuracy of frozen-section examination for myometrial invasion and grade in endometrial cancer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;167:90–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bige O, Demir A, Saygili U, Gode F, Uslu T, Koyuncuoglu M. Frozen section diagnoses of 578 ovarian tumors made by pathologists with and without expertise on gynecologic pathology. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;123:43–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Malipatil R, Crasta JA. How accurate is intraoperative frozen section in the diagnosis of ovarian tumors? J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2013;39:710–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Stewart CJ, Brennan BA, Hammond IG, Leung YC, McCartney AJ. Accuracy of frozen section in distinguishing primary ovarian neoplasia from tumors metastatic to the ovary. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2005;24:356–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Aslam MF, Ghayoori R, Khulpateea N. Adnexal masses: relative accuracy of sonography and frozen section in predicting final pathology. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2010;30:187–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Novis DA, Zarbo RJ. Interinstitutional comparison of frozen section turnaround time. A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 32868 frozen sections in 700 hospitals. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997;121:559–67.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Raab SS, Tworek JA, Souers R, Zarbo RJ. The value of monitoring frozen section-permanent section correlation data over time. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2006;130:337–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hui, P., Buza, N. (2015). Intraoperative Consultation in Gynecologic Pathology: Introduction. In: Atlas of Intraoperative Frozen Section Diagnosis in Gynecologic Pathology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21807-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21807-6_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21806-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-21807-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics