Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Process

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Maritime Governance

  • 768 Accesses

Abstract

Starting from the premise that one of the causes of failure in maritime governance comes from its static nature, our examination of the significance of form in policy-making and governance has led us to consider the role of time and how its incorporation might be a significant ingredient in overcoming the lack of movement that characterises governance of the sector, something that as far back as Galileo might have seemed unacceptable. This chapter focuses upon process and the need for a more fluid and flexible approach to maritime governance. After discussing the origins, significance and context for process as a central part of maritime governance, it goes on to compare this with the current ‘snapshot’ approach upon which maritime policy-makers tend to rely. The issues of form, object and flow are then introduced along with change and governance and the potential offered by a process approach. The chapter concludes with a consideration of the variety of process models that might be applied to the redefinition of maritime governance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abrams, P. (1983). Historical sociology. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adgar, W. N. (2000). Social and ecological resilience: Are they related? Progress in Human Geography, 24(3), 347–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2003). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, S., Castaneda, C., Fortier, A., & Sheller, M. (Eds.). (2003). Uprooting/regroundings: Questions of home and migration. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. (1979). Organizations and environments. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, E. R. (1982). Design in the decision-making process. Policy Sciences, 14, 279–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, P. M., Senglier, M., Engelen, G., & Boon, F. (1985). Towards a new synthesis in the modeling of evolving complex systems. Environment and Planning B, 12, 65–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allmendinger, P. (2001). Planning in postmodern times. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (2002). Cities: Reimagining the Urban. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. E. (1979). Public policymaking. New York: Rinehart and Winstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelides, C., & Caiden, G. (1994). Adjusting policy-thinking to global pragmatics and future problematics. Public Administration and Development, 14, 223–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, A. (1990). Disjuncture and difference in the global cultural economy. In M. Featherstone (Ed.), Global culture (pp. 295–310). London: Nationalism, Globalization and Modernity, Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astley, W. G., & Zajac, F. (1991). Intraorganizational power and organizational design: Reconciling rational and coalitional models of organization. Organization Science, 2(4), 399–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A. A., Waterhouse, J. H., & Wells, R. B. (1997). A stakeholder approach to strategic performance measurement. Sloan Management Review, 38, 25–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, A. J. (2000). Port privatisation: Objectives, extent, process and the UK experience. International Journal of Maritime Economics, 2(43), 177–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bales, R. F., & Strodtbeck, F. L. (1951). Phases in group problem-solving. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 485–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltes, P. B., Dittman-Kohli, F., & Dixcon, A. (1986). Multidisciplinary propositions on the development of intelligence during adulthood and old age. In A. B. Sorensen, P. E. Weinert, & L. R. Sherrod (Eds.), Human development and the life course: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 467–507). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basch, L., Schiller, N. G., & Blanc, C. S. (1994). Nations unbound: Transnational projects, postcolonial predicaments and deterritorialized nation states. New York: Gordon and Breach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, F., & Jones, B. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago IL: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (2000). What is globalization?. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendor, J., Moe, T. M., & Shotts, K. (2001). Recycling the garbage can: An assessment of the research program. American Political Science Review, 95(1), 169–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, C. J. (1991). What is policy convergence and what causes it? British Journal of Political Science, 21, 215–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benninghoff, A. (1938). Lehrbuch der anatomie des menschen. Munich: JF Lehmann Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City NY: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, B. J. L. (1973). A paradigm for modern geography. In R. J. Chorley (Ed.), Directions in geography (pp. 3–21). London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, R. (1978). On the possibility of social scientific knowledge and the limits of neutralism. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 8, 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, R. (1979). The possibility of naturalism: a philosophical critique of the contemporary human sciences. Brighton: Harvester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigelow, J., Ellis, B., & Pargetter, R. (1988). Forces. Philosophy of Science, 55(4), 614–630.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bird, J. (1981). The target of space and the arrow of time. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS, 6, 129–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaut, J. M. (1961). Space and process. The Professional Geographer, XIII, 4, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaut, J. M. (1962). Object and relationship. The Professional Geographer, XIV, 6, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D. (1975). Human nature as a product of our mental models. In J. Bentall (Ed.), The limits of human nature. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D. (1980). Wholeness and the implicate order. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boons, F., Van Buuren, A., Gerrits, L., & Teisman, G. R. (2009). Towards an approach of evolutionary public management. In F. Boons, M. W. van Buuren, & L. Gerrits (Eds.), Managing complex governance systems. Dynamics, self-organization and coevolution in public investments (pp. 231–249). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgese, E. M. (1998). The oceanic circle: Governing the seas as a global resource. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borzel, T. A., & Risse, T. (2010). Governance without a state; can it work? Regulation and Governance, 4, 113–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1977a). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1977b). The economics of linguistic exchange. Social Science Information, 6, 645–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction. A social critque of judgement. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braganza, A., & Korac-Kakabadse, N. (2000). Towards a function and process orientation: Challenges for business leaders in the new millennium. Strategic Change, 9, 45–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braganza, A., & Lambert, R. (2000). Strategic integration: Developing a process-governance framework. Knowledge and Process Management, 7(3), 177–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N. (1997). State territorial restructuring and the production of spatial scale. Political Geography, 16, 273–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N. (1998). Between fixity and motion: Accumulation, territorial organization and the historical geography of spatial scales. Environment and Planning D, 16(4), 459–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N. (1999). Beyond state-centrism? Space, territoriality and geographical scale in globalization studies, Theory and Society, 28(1), 39–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, M. R., & Pallis, A. A. (2003). Assessing port governance models: Process and performance components. Maritime Policy and Management, 35(4), 411–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer, S. (1994). The governance of the European Union: A new institutionalist approach. Journal of Public Policy, 13(4), 351–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, W. (1968). Fred K. Schaefer and the science of geography, Harvard papers in theoretical geography, special paper A. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, W. (1979). Schaefer and the science of geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 69(1), 128–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman, R. A. (1991). Intraorganizational ecology of strategy-making and organizational adaptation: theory and field research. Organization Science, 2(3), 239–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman, R. A., & Sayles, L. R. (1986). Inside corporate innovation strategy structure and managerial skills. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buttimer, A. (1976). Grasping the dynamism of lifeworld. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 66(2), 277–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bylund, E. (1956). Kolonisering av Pite Lappmark, t. O. M. dr 1867, (Uppsala).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bylund, E. (1960). Theoretical considerations regarding the distribution of settlement in Inner North Sweden. Geografiska Annaler, 42, 225–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvert, R., McCubbins, M., & Weingast, B. (1989). A theory of political control and agency discretion. American Journal of Political Science, 33, 588–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. (1969). Variation and selective retention in socio-cultural evolution. General Systems, 16, 69–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caporaso, J. (1996). The European Union and forms of state: Westphalian, regulatory or post-modern. Journal of Common Market Studies, 34(1), 29–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, G., & Hannan, T. (1989). Density delay in the evolution of organizational populations, A model and five empirical tests. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(3), 411–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cashore, B., & Howlett, M. (2007). Punctuating which equilibrium? Understanding thermostatic policy dynamics in Pacific Northwest forestry. American Journal of Political Science, 51(3), 532–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1996). The information age: Economy, society and culture (Vol. 1). The Rise of the Network Society, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1997). The information age: Economy, society and culture (Vol. 2). The Power of Identity, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1998). The information age: Economy, society and culture (Vol. 3). End of Millennium, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M., & Portes, A. (1989). World underneath: The origins, dynamics, and the effects of the informal economy. In A. Portes (Ed.), The informal economy: studies in advanced and less developed countries (pp. 11–37). Baltimore MD: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarthy, B. S., & Lorange, P. (1991). Managing the strategy process. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y.-T., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1996). Learning the innovation journey: Order out of chaos? Organizational Science, 7(6), 593–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chorley, R. J. (1973). Geography as human ecology. In R. J. Chorley (Ed.), Directions in geography (pp. 155–169). London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. H. (1954). Historical geography. In P. E. James & C. F. Jones (Eds.), American geography; inventory and prospect (pp. 70–105). Syracuse NY: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, J. (1992). Travelling cultures. In L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, & P. A. Treichler (Eds.), Cultural studies (pp. 96–116). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, J. (1997). Routes. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. D., & March, J. P. (1974). Leadership and ambiguity. New York: The American College President, McGrawHill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1972). A garbage can model of organisational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. D., & Sproull, L. S. (1991). Editors’ introduction. Organizational Science, 2(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, S., & Crang, M. (Eds.). (2002). Tourism between place and performance. Oxford: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, J., & Esteban, R. (1999). Governance in the participative organisation: Freedom, creativity and ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 21(2/3), 173–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, J., & Yetton, P. (1993). Business process redesign: A critique of process innovation by thomas davenport as a case study in the literature. Australian Journal of Management, 17, 285–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cram, L. (2011). The importance of the temporal dimension: New modes of governance as a tool of government. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(5), 636–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, T. (Ed.). (2001). Mobilities. New Formations, 43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, D., & Lubbren, N. (Eds.). (2003). Visual culture and tourism. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowston, K. (1997). A coordination theory approach to organizational process design. Organization Science, 8, 157–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dacey, M. F. (1964). Two dimensional random point patterns. Papers in Regional Science, 13(1), 41–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T. H. (1993). Process innovation: Reengineering work through information technology. Boston MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, T. R. V. (1991). Information technology and white collar productivity. Academy of Management Executive, 5, 55–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, W. M. (1899). The geographical cycle. The Geographical Journal, 14(5), 481–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. B. (1989). Keynes on atomism and organicism. The Economic Journal, 99, 1159–1172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bruijn, H., Teisman, G. R., Edelenbos, J., & Veeneman, W. (Eds.). (2004). Multiple land use and the management of complex projects. Utrecht: Lemma. (in Dutch).

    Google Scholar 

  • Degen, M., & Hetherington, K. (2001). Hauntings. Space and Culture, 11(12), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1988). A thousand plateaus. Capitalism and Schizophrenia, Minneapolis MN: Minnesota University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, K., & Urry, J. (2009). After the car. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Der Derian, J. (1990). The (s)pace of international relations: Simulation, surveillance and speed. International Studies Quarterly, 34(3), 295–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1987). Positions. London: Athlone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodd, S. C. (1950). The interactive hypothesis: A gravity model fitting physical masses and human groups. American Sociological Review, 15, 245–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, S. D. (1936). The chorology of the claremont-springfield region in the upper connecticut valley in New Hampshire and Vermont. Papers of the Michigan Academy of Sciences, Arts and Letters, 22, 335–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooley, K. J., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1999). Explaining complex organizational dynamics. Organization Science, 10(3), 358–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doolittle, W. E. (1984). Agricultural change as an incremental process. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 74(1), 124–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dopfer, K. (1991). Toward a theory of economic institutions: Synergy and path dependency. Journal of Economic Issues, XXV, 2, 535–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H. (1991). Being-in-the-world: A commentary on Heidegger’s being and time, division 1. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1895). Les Regles de la Methode Sociologique. Paris: F. Alcan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyck, I. (1990). Space, time and renegotiating motherhood: An exploration of the domestic workplace. Environment and Planning D, 8, 459–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dye, T. (1966). Politics, economics and the public. Rand McNally: Chicago IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelenbos, I., Klijn, E.-H., & Kort, M. (2009). Managing complex process systems. Surviving at the edge of chaos. In G. Teisman, A. Van Buuren, & L. Gerrits (Eds.), Managing complex governance systems (pp. 172–192). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, C., & Peppard, J. (1994). Forging a link between business strategy and business reengineering. European Management Journal, 12, 407–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eichenbaum, J., & Gale, S. (1971). Form, function and process: A methodological enquiry. Economic Geography, 47(4), 525–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. (1984). Uber die Zeit. A zur Wissenssoziologie II, Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R. W. (1841). Essays: First series, createspace independent publishing platform.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelen, G. (1988). The theory of self-organization and modelling complex urban systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 37, 42–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ettlie, J. E., & Reza, E. M. (1992). Organizational integration and process innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 795–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1963). The epigenesis of political communities at the international level. American Journal of Sociology, 68, 407–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Euske, K. J., & Player, R. S. (1996). Leveraging management improvement techniques. Sloan Management Review, 38, 69–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyestone, R. (1978). From social issue to public policy. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Featherman, D. L. (1986). Biography, society and history: Individual development as a population process. In A. B. Sorensen, F. E. Weinert, & L. R. Sherrod (Eds.), Human development and the life course: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 99–149). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fioretti, G., & Lomi, A. (2008). The garbage can model of organizational choice: An agent-based reconstruction. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 16, 192–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortes, M. (1949). The web of kinship among the tallensi; the second part of an analysis of the social structure of the Trans-Volta tribe. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francke, M., & Ham, E. (2006). Space of flows. Manuel Castells, Geographical Approaches, 26, 01.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, W. L., & Bell, C. H, Jr. (1978). Organization development: Behavior science interventions for organization improvement. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, J. (2000). Reading Castells: Zeitdiagnose and social theory. Environment and Planning D, 18, 111–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, V. R. (1962). Changes in the location of manufacturing in the United States since 1929. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gage, R. W., & Mandell, M. P. (Eds.). (1990). Strategies for managing intergovernmental policies and networks. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gemmill, G., & Smith, C. (1998). A dissipative structure model of organization transformation. Human Relations, 38(8), 751–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gersick, C. J. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31(1), 9–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gersick, C. J. (1991). Revolutionary change theories: A multilevel exploration of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 10–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gertler, M. S. (1988). Some problems of time in economic geography. Environment and Planning A, 20(2), 151–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S., & Bartlett, C. A. (1998). The individualized corporation: A fundamentally new approach to management. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1976). New rules of sociological method. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1981). A contemporary critique of historical materialism. Power, property and the state (Vol. 1). Berkeley CA: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1983). Profiles and critiques in social theory. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, F., Abu-Lughod, L., & Larkin, B. (2002). Media worlds: Anthropology on New Terrain. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gluck, F. W., Kaufman, S. P., & Walleck, A. S. (1980). Strategic management for competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review, 58(4), 154–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild, M. F. (2004). GIScience, geography, form and process. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94(4), 709–714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, M., Duncan, S., & Halford, S. (1994). Regulation theory, the local state and the transition of urban politics. Environment and Planning D, 11, 67–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, M., & Painter, J. (1996). Local governance: The crisis of Fordism and the changing geographies of regulation. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS, 21, 635–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gormley, W. (1983). The politics of public utility regulation. Pittsburgh PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, D. (1978). Ideology, science and human geography. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, D. (1982a). Regional transformation and industrial revolution: A geography of the yorkshire woollen industry. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, D. (1982b). Solid geometry: Notes on the recovery of spatial structure. In P. Gould & G. Olsson (Eds.), A search for common ground (pp. 187–219). London: Pion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, K. J. (2000). The changing nature of physical geography. London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greiner, L. (1972). Evolution and revolution as organizations grow (pp. 165–174). Watertown, Massachusetts.: Harvard Business Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gren, M. (2003). Time geography matters. In J. May & N. Thrift (Eds.), Timespace (pp. 208–225). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, D. R. (1998). Process philosophy. In E. Craig (Ed.), Routledge encyclopaedia of philosophy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunbaum, A. (1971). The meaning of time. In E. Freeman & W. Sellars (Eds.), Basic issues in the philosophy of time (pp. 195–228). Chicago IL: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagerstrand, T. (1957). Migration and area. In D. Hannerberg, T. Hagerstrand, & B. Odeving (Eds.), Migration in Sweden: A symposium (p. 13). Sweden: Lund Studies in Geography, Series B.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagerstrand, T. (1970). Regional forecasting and social engineering. In M. Chisholm, A. E. Frey, & P. Haggett (Eds.), Regional forecasting (pp. 1–7). London: Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagerstrand, T. (1973). The domain of human geography. In R. J. Chorley (Ed.), Directions in geography (pp. 69–87). London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagerstrand, T. (1984). Presence and absence: A look at conceptual choices and bodily necessities. Regional Studies, 18, 373–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagerstrand, T. (2004). The two vistas. Geografiska Annaler B, 86(4), 315–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (1993). Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 929–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M., & Freeman, J. (1989). Organisational ecology. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartshorne, R. (1939). The nature of geography; a critical survey in the light of the past. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 29(3), 173–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartshorne, R. (1958). The concept of geography as a science of space, from Kant and Humboldt to Hettner. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 48(2), 97–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1967). Models of the evolution of spatial patterns in human geography. In R. J. Chorley & P. Haggett (Eds.), Integrated models in geography (pp. 549–608). London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1969). Explanation in geography. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1982). The limits to capital. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1989). The condition of postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1993). From space to place and back again: Reflections on the conditions of postmodernity. In J. Bird, B. Curtis, T. Putnam, G. Robertson, & L. Tickner (Eds.), Mapping the futures: Local cultures, global change (pp. 3–29). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, R. (1986). A road not taken: Sociology and the neglect of the automobile. California Sociologist, 9, 61–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1985). History of the concept of time. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg, W. (1976). The nature of elementary particles. Physics Today, 29, 32–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, J. (1955). Homeostasis, society and evolution: A critique. The Scientific Monthly, 81, 300–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herskovits, M. J. (1955). Cultural anthropology. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, M. (1999). Globalocal. On the significance of space for time, speed and mobility. In J. Beckmann (Ed.), SPEED. A workshop on space, time and mobility (pp. 31–39). The Danish Transport Council: Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington, K. (2003). Moderns as ancients: Time, space and the discourse of improvement. In J. May & N. Thrift (Eds.), Timespace (pp. 49–72). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hettner, A. (1905). Das Wesen und die Methoden der Geografie (pp. 545–614). XI: Geographische Zeitschrift.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G. M. (1993). Economics and evolution: Bringing life back into economics. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huggett, R., & Perkins, C. (2004). Landscape as form, process and meaning. In J. A. Matthews & D. T. Herbert (Eds.), Unifying geography: Common heritage, Shared future (pp. 224–239). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P., & Smith, S. (1984). Exploring social geography. London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, P. E., & Jones, C. F. (1954). American geography. Inventory and prospect. Syracuse NY: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janelle, D. G. (1969). Spatial reorganization: A model and concept. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 59(2), 348–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jantsch, E. (1980). The self-organizing universe. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayanthi, S., & Sinha, K. K. (1998). Innovation implementation in high technology manufacturing. Chaos-theoretic empirical analysis Management, 16, 471–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jelinek, M., & Schoonhoven, C. (1990). The innovation marathon. New York: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (1997a). Globalization and the national state; reflections on a theme from Poulantzas. New York: Colloquium on Miliband and Poulantzas in Retrospect and Prospect.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (1997b). The entrepreneurial city; re-imaging localities, re-designing economic governance, or re-structuring capital? In N. Jewson & S. MacGregor (Eds.), Transforming cities: Contested governance and new spatial divisions (pp. 28–41). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R. J., Gregory, D., Pratt, G., & Watts, M. (2000). The dictionary of human geography. London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. O. (1977). An introduction to the study of public policy. Boston: Duxbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, C. F., & Jones, P. E. (1954). Introduction. In C. F. James & P. E. Jones (Eds.), American geography inventory and prospect (pp. 2–18). Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Syracuse NY: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, C. (1964). Man and his symbols. St Louis MO: Turtleback Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kansky, K. J. (1963). Structure of transportation networks. Department of Geography, Research Paper: University of Chicago. 84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (1988). When a thousand flowers bloom; structural, collective and social conditions for innovation in organizations. In B. Staw & L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 10). Greenwich CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, C. (1996). Questions of travel. Durham NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson, R. E., & Minghi, J. V. (1969). Process: Introduction. In R. E. Kasperson & J. V. Minghi (Eds.), The structure of political geography (pp. 195–210). Chicago IL: Aldine Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, V. (2002). Re-thinking mobility: Contemporary sociology. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, P. (2007). Global transformations but local, ‘bubble’ lives: Taking a reality check on some globalization concepts. Globalization, 4(2), 267–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kent, M. (2003). Space: Making room for space in physical geography. In S. Holloway, S. P. Rice, & G. Valentine (Eds.), Key concepts in geography (pp. 109–130). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettinger, W. J., Teng, J. T. C., & Cuha, S. (1996). Information architectural design in business processing reengineering. Journal of Information Technology, 11, 27–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kickert, W. J. M., Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (1997). Managing complex networks: Strategies for the public sector. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimberly, J., & Miles, R. (1980). The organizational life-cycle. San Francisco CA: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, J. (1984). Agendas, alternatives and public policies. Boston MA: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klijn, E-H. (1996). Analyzing and managing policy processes in complex networks; a theoretical examination of the concept policy network and its problems. Administration and Society, 28(1), 90–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klijn, E.-H., & Snellen, I. (2009). Complexity theory and public administration. In G. R. Teisman, A. Van Buuren, & L. Gerrits (Eds.), Managing complex governance systems (pp. 17–36). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobayashi, A. (1989). A critique of dialectical landscape. In A. Kobayashi & S. Mackenzie (Eds.), Remaking human geography. Boston: Hyman Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The developmental approach to socialization. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 347–480). Rand McNally: San Francisco CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koput, K. (1992). Dynamics of innovative idea generation in organizations: Randomness and chaos in the development of a new medical device. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, School of Business, University of California, Berkeley CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosik, K. (1976). Dialectics of the Concrete, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lash, S., & Urry, J. (1994). Economies of signs and space. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layder, D. (1981). Structure, interaction and social theory. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. J. (2009). Super wicked problems and climate change: Restraining the present to liberate the future. Environmental Law and Policy Annual Review, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Poidevin, R. (2003). Travels in four dimensions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach, E. R. (1954). Political systems of highland Burma. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. E. (1997). From enlightenment to chaos; toward nonmodern social theory. In R. A. Eve, S. M. Horsfall, & F. Lee (Eds.), Chaos, complexity and sociology: Myths, models and theories (pp. 15–29). Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, D. J. (1978). The seasons of a man’s life. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, B., & Naas, C. (1989). The lid on the garbage can: Institutional constraints on decision-making in the technical core of college text publishers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 190–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, C. E. (1965). The intelligence of democracy. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipson, M. (2007). A garbage can model of UN peacekeeping. Global Governance, 13, 79–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lista, G. (1986). Futurism and photography. London: Merrell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorange, P. (1980). Corporate planning. An executive viewpoint. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovgren, E. (1956). The geographical mobility of labour. Geografiska Annaler B, 38, 344–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowi, T. (1964). American business, public policy and political theory. World Politics, 16, 677–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. (1993). Scientific practice and ordinary action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynd, R., & Lynd, H. (1937). Middletown in transition. New York: Harvest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, L. H. (1982). How Japan innovates: A comparison with the US in the case of oxygen steel-making. Boulder CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macey, J. (1992). Organizational design and political control of administrative agencies. Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 8, 93–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, K. D. (1986). Organizational design: The organizational audit and analysis technology. Norwood NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, G., & Goodwin, M. (1999). Space, scale and state strategy; rethinking urban and regional governance. Progress in Human Geography, 23(4), 503–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandell, M. P. (Ed.). (2001). Getting results through collaboration: networks and network structures for public policy and management. Westport CT: Quorum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantel, S. J. (2005). Core concepts on project management. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1975). The university of the past; organization and learning under ambiguity. European Journal of Political Research, 3, 141–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1976). Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Bergen: Universititetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1983). Organizing political life: What administrative reorganization tells us about government. The American Political Science Review, 77(2), 281–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1984). The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life. The American Political Science Review, 78(3), 734–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1986). Garbage can models of decision-making in organisations. In J. G. March & R. Weissinger-Baylon (Eds.), Ambiguity and command, organizational perspectives on military decision-making (pp. 11–35). Marshfield MA: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organization. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, A. (2003). Fuzzy concepts, scanty evidence, policy distance: The case for rigour and policy relevance in critical regional studies. Regional Studies 37(6 and 7), 701–717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. (1990). Deconstructing organizational TABOOS: The suppression of gender conflict in organizations. Organization Science, 1(4), 339–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. (1993). Politics and space/time. In M. Keith & S. Pile (Eds.), Place and politics of identity (pp. 141–161). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masuch, M. (1985). Vicious cycles in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30(1), 14–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masuch, M., & LaPotin, P. (1989). Beyond garbage cans: An A1 model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 38–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, J. A., & Herbert, D. T. (2004). Unity in geography: Prospects for the discipline. In J. A. Matthews & D. T. Herbert (Eds.), Unifying geography (pp. 369–393). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, J. A., & Herbert, D. T. (2008). Geography: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • May, J., & Thrift, N. (2003). Introduction. In J. May & N. Thrift (Eds.), Timespace (pp. 1–46). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew, D. (1974). Congress: The electoral connection. New Haven MA: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCubbins, M., Noll, R., & Weingast, B. (1989). Structure and process, politics and policy: Administrative arrangements and the political control of agencies. Virginia Law Review, 75, 431–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, B. (1999). Complexity theory in organization science; seizing the promise or becoming a fad? Emergence, 1(1), 5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H. (1932). The philosophy of the present. New York: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medd, W., & Marvin, S. (2005). From the politics of urgency to the governance of preparedness: A research agenda on urban vulnerability. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 13(2), 44–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meentemeyer, V. (1989). Geographical perspectives of space, time and scale. Landscape Ecology, 3(3–4), 163–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meredith, J. R., & Mantel, S. J. (2000). Project management: A managerial approach. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. (1968). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mihata, K. (1997). The persistence of ‘emergence’. In R. A. Eve, S. Horsfall, & M. E. Lee (Eds.), Chaos, complexity and sociology: Myths, models and theories (pp. 30–38). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minkowski, E. (1933). Lived time: Phenomenological and psychopathological studies. Evanston IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H., Raisinghani, D., & Theoret, A. (1976). The structure of ‘unstructured’ decision processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(2), 246–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moe, T. (1990). The politics of structural choice: Toward a theory of public bureaucracy. In O. Williamson (Ed.), Organization theory: From Chester Barnard to the present and beyond. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mol, A., & Law, J. (1994). Regions, networks and fluids: Anaemia and social topology. Social Studies of Science, 24, 641–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mol, A. P. J., & Spaargaren, G. (2005). From additions and withdrawals to environmental flows. Organization and Environment, 18(1), 91–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (1986). Images of organization. Newbury Park CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrill, R. L. (1965). Migration and the spread and growth of urban settlement. Sweden: Lund Studies in Geography, Series B. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M. (1988). At Henry Parkes motel. Cultural Studies, 2, 1–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mucciaroni, G. (1992). The garbage can model and the study of policy making: A critique. Polity, XXIV, 3, 459–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muth, R. F. (1961). Rural urban land conversions. Econometrica, 29, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T. (1979). Mortal questions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, P. (1959). Migration, real income and information. Journal of Regional Science, 1(2), 43–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economics. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neo, B. S., & Chen, G. (2007). Dynamic governance. Singapore: World Scientific.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, R. A. (1970). Developmentalism: A critical analysis. In J. McKinney & E. Tiryakin (Eds.), Theoretical sociology: Perspectives and developments (pp. 167–206). New York: Meredith.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, W. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago IL: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noe, T. H., & Rebello, M. J. (2007). Dynamic governance. Oxford: Oxford University Finance Workshop.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norgaard, R. B. (1984). Coevolutionary development potential. Land Economics, 60(2), 160–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Riordan, T. (2004). Towards sustainability. In J. A. Matthews & D. T. Herbert (Eds.), Unifying geography: Common heritage, shared future (pp. 117–143). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odim, E. P. (1971). Fundamentals of ecology. Philadelphia PA: W.B. Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, J. P. (2001). Garbage cans, new institutionalism, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 95(1), 191–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, G. (1965a). Distance and human interaction: A bibliography and review. Philadelphia: Regional Science Research Institute, Bibliography Series B.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, G. (1965b). Distance and human interaction: A migration study. Geografiska Annaler Series B, 47(1), 3–43.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Padgett, J. F. (1980). Managing garbage can hierarchies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 583–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, R. (1951). The social system. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascoe, D. (2001). Airspaces. London: Reaktion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, F. E. (1967). Greek philosophical terms: A historical lexicon. New York: NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peuquet, D. J. (2002). Representations of space and time. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (1981). Power in organizations. Boston MA: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philo, C. (1984). Reflections on Gunnar Olsson’s contribution to the discourse of contemporary human geography. Society and Space, 2, 217–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1975). The child’s conception of the world. Totowa NJ: Littlefield Adams.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, P. (1993). When effect becomes cause; policy feedback and political change. World Politics, 45(4), 595–628.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in time. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt, J. (1970). Hierarchical growth. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 26(9), 2–4, 46–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, M. S., & Roth, J. (1989). Decision development in small groups V: Test of a contingency model. Human Communication Research, 15(4), 549–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (1970). Normal science and its dangers. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (Vol. 4, pp. 51–8). Proceedings of the International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science: Cambridge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (1974). Karl Popper. In P. A. Schilpp (Ed.), The philosophy of Karl Popper. La Salle IL: Open Court Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pred, A. (1983). Structuration and place: On the becoming of sense of place and structure of feeling. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 13, 45–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pred, A. (1984a). Place as historically contingent process: Structuration and the time-geography of becoming places. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 74(2), 279–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pred, A. (1984b). Structuration, biography formation and knowledge: Observations on port growth during the late mercantile period. Society and Space, 2, 251–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pred, A. (1985a). Place, practice and structure: social and spatial transformation in Southern Sweden, 1750–1850. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pred, A. (1985b). The social becomes the spatial, the spatial becomes the social-enclosures, social change and the becoming of places in the Swedish province of Skane. In D. Gregory & J. Urry (Eds.), Social relations and spatial structures (pp. 337–365). London: Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pred, A. (1986). Power, practice and consciousness. Svensk Geografisk Arsbok, 62, 47–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pred, A. (1996). Interfusions: Consumption, identity and the practices and power relations of everyday life. Environment and Planning A, 28(1), 11–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I. (1980). From being to becoming: Time and complexity in the physical sciences. San Francisco CA: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I. (1997). The end of certainty. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I., & Stengers, S. (1984). Order out of chaos. New York: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. B. (1980). Strategies for change: Logical incrementalism. Homewood IL: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. B. (1985). Managing innovations: Controlled chaos (pp. 73–84). Watertown, Massachusetts: Harvard Business Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radaelli, C. M. (2000). Policy transfer in the European Union; institutional isomorphism as a source of legitimacy. Governance, 13(1), 25–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raimon, R. L. (1962). Interstate migration and wage theory. Review of Economics and Statistics, 54, 428–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, H. (1958). The philosophy of space and time. London: Constable and Co Ltd.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Renwick, W. H. (1992). Equilibrium, disequilibrium, and nonequilibrium landforms in the landscape. Geomorphology, 5, 265–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, N. (1978). Scientific progress. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, N. (1999). On situating process philosophy. Process Studies, 28(1/2), 37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoads, B. L. (2005). Process/form. In N. Castree, A. Rogers, & D. Sherman (Eds.), Questioning geography (pp. 131–150). Malden MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, K., Bithell, M., & Bravo, M. (2004). Space, time and science. In J. A. Matthews & D. T. Herbert (Eds.), Unifying geography (pp. 327–352). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rifkin, J. (2000). The age of access. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riles, A. (2001). The network inside out. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, R. (1992). Globalization, social theory and global culture. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojek, C., & Urry, J. (1997). Transformations of travel and theory. In C. Rojek & J. Urry (Eds.), Touring cultures (pp. 1–22). London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Roseman, C. C. (1971). Migration as a spatial and temporal process. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 61(3), 589–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, J. M. (1990). Turbulence in world politics: A theory of change and continuity. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, A. (1993). The third house: Lobbyists and lobbying in the United States. Washington DC: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rostow, W. W. (1960). The stages of economic growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggles, R. (1998). The state of the notion: Knowledge management in practice. California Management Review, 40, 80–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1918). The philosophy of logical atomism. The Monist, 28(4), 495–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1926). Our knowledge of the external world. London: George Allen and Unwin.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. A. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences, 31, 129–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. A. (1991). Toward better theories of the policy process. Political Science and Politics, 24(2), 147–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. A. (1998). The advocacy coalition framework; revisions and relevance for Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 5, 98–130.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sack, R. D. (1972). Geography, geometry and explanation. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 62(1), 61–78.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. (1983). The world, the text and the critic. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sailor, D. B. (1964). Moses and atomism. Journal of the History of Ideas, 25(1), 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury, R. (1986). Washington lobbyists: A collective portrait. In A. Cigler & B. Looms (Eds.), Interest group politics (pp. 146–161). Washington DC: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. (1994). Cities in a world economy. Thousand Oaks CA: Pine Forge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, C. (1941). Foreword to historical geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 31(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer, F. K. (1953). Exceptionalism in geography :A methodological examination. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 43(3), 226–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlager, E., & Blomquist, W. (1996). A comparison of three emerging theories of the policy process. Political Research Quarterly, 49(3), 651–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, A., & Ingram, H. (1998). Systematically pinching ideas: A comparative approach to policy design. Journal of Public Policy, 8(1), 61–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, M., Teske, P., & Minitrom, M. (1995). Public entrepreneurs: Agents for change in American government. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholte, J. A. (2000). Globalization: A critical introduction. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumm, S. A., & Lichty, R. W. (1965). Time, space and causality in geomorphology. American Journal of Science, 263, 110–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, B. R. (1971). Stages of corporate development. Boston MA: Harvard Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. (1983). Intentionality. An essay in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Seldadyo, H., Elhorst, J. P., & De Haan, J. (2010). Geography and governance: Does space matter? Papers in Regional Science, 89(3), 625–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serres, M. (1995). Angels: A modern myth. Paris: Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, J. D. (1985). Foreword. In R. Diwan & M. Lutz (Eds.), Gandhian economics. New Delhi: Gandhi Peace Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharkansky, I. (1968). Spending in the American states. Chicago IL: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheller, M. (2003). Consuming the Caribbean. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A, 38, 207–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shields, R. (1997). Flow as a new paradigm. Space and Culture, 1, 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shotter, J. (1983). ‘Duality of structure’ and ‘intentionality’ in an ecological psychology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 13, 19–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrader-Frechette, K. (1977). Atomism in crisis: An analysis of the current high energy paradigm. Philosophy of Science, 44, 409–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1976). From substantive to procedural rationality. In S. J. Latsis (Ed.), Method and appraisal in economics (pp. 129–148). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, P. (2003). Previous actors and current influences, trends and fashions in physical geography. In S. Trudgill & A. Roy (Eds.), Contemporary meanings in physical geography, From What to why? (pp. 3–24). London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, J. V. (Ed.). (1990). Organizational evolution: New directions. Newbury Park CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjaastad, L. A. (1960). The relationship between migration and income in the United States. Papers of the Regional Science Association, 6(1), 37–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slot, P. J., & Grabant, E. (1986). Extraterritoriality and jurisdiction. Common Market Law Review, 23, 545–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowden, D. (2005). From atomism to networks in social systems. The Learning Organisation, 12(6), 552–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spaargaren, G., & Mol, A. P. J. (2008). Green global consumption: Redefining politics and authority. Global Environmental Change, 18, 350–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoddart, D. R. (1997). Richard J. Chorley and modern geography. In D. R. Stoddart (Ed.), Process and form in geomorphology (pp. 383–399). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strahler, A. N. (1952). Dynamic basis of geomorphology. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, 63, 923–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Susskind, L., & Cruikshank, J. (1987). Breaking Robert’s rules: The new way to run your meeting, build consensus, and get results. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, R. (1999). The policy process: An overview, Overseas Development Institute, Working Paper, 118. London: ODI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw, E. (1997). Neither global nor local: ‘Glocalization’ and the politics of scale. In K. Cox (Ed.), Spaces of globalization, reasserting the power of the local (pp. 138–166). Guilford: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sztompka, P. (1984). The global crisis and the effectiveness of the social system. In E. A. Tiryakian (Ed.), International studies in sociology and social anthropology. the global crisis: sociological analyses and responses (Vol. 34). Leiden: E.J. Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taafe, E., Morrill, R. L., & Gould, P. R. (1963). Transport development in underdeveloped countries. Geographical Review, 53, 503–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi, N. (1992). Decision-making by flight in Japanese firms. Organizational Science, 26(3), 21–32. (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi, N. (1997). A single garbage can model and the degree of anarchy in Japanese firms. Human Relations, 50(1), 91–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taleb, N. N. (2007). The black swan. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, G. (1937). Environment, race and nation. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. (2003). Time: From hegemonic change to everyday life. In S. Holloway, S. Rice, & G. Valentine (Eds.), Key concepts in geography (pp. 151–164). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teisman, G., Gerrits, L., & Van Buuren, A. (2009a). An introduction to understanding and managing complex systems. In G. Teisman, A. Van Buuren, & L. Gerrits (Eds.), Managing complex governance systems (pp. 1–16). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teisman, G., Van Buuren, A., & Gerrits, L. (Eds.). (2009b). Managing complex governance systems. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, K., & Steinmo, S. (1992). Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. In K. Thelen, S. Steinmo, & P. Longstreth (Eds.), Structuring politics: Historical institutionalism in comparative analysis (pp. 1–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thietart, R. A., & Forgues, B. (1995). Chaos theory and organization. Organization Science, 6(1), 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornes, J. (1979). Introduction. In C. Embleton & J. Thornes (Eds.), Process in geomorphology (pp. 1–10). London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, N. (1977). Time and theory in human geography. Part 1. Progress in Human Geography, 1(1), 65–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, N. (1983). On the determination of social action in space and time. Society and Space, 1, 23–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, N. (1996). Spatial formations. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S., & Goodfield, J. (1962). The architecture of matter. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Touraine, A. (1977). The self-production of society. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L., & Anderson, P. (1986). Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 439–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unwin, T. (1992). The place of geography. Harlow: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urry, J. (2000). Sociology beyond societies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urry, J. (2003). Global complexity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urry, J. (2005). The complexities of the global. Theory, Culture and Society, 22(5), 235–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urry, J. (2010). Mobile sociology. The British Journal of Sociology, 61, 347–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A. H. (1992). Suggestions for studying strategy process: A research note. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 169–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A. H., & Poole, M. S. (1988). Paradoxical requirements for a theory of organizational change. In R. Quinn & K. Cameron (Eds.), Paradox and transformation: Toward a theory of change in organization and management (pp. 19–63). New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bergh, J. C. J. M., & Gowdy, J. M. (2000). Evolutionary theories in environmental and resource economics: Approaches and applications. Environmental and Resource Economics, 17, 37–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Gils, M., Gerrits, L., & Teisman, G. R. (2009). Non-linear dynamics in port systems. Change events at work. In G. R. Teisman, A. Van Buuren, & L. Gerrits (Eds.), Managing complex governance systems (pp. 76–96). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verstraete, G., & Cresswell, T. (Eds.). (2002). Mobilizing place; placing mobility. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vertovec, S. (1999). Conceiving and researching transnationalism. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 22, 447–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virilio, P. (1975). Bunker Archeologie. Paris: Centre de Creation Industrielle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virilio, P. (1977). L’Insecurite de Territoire. Paris: Galilee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virilio, P. (1978). Defense Populaire et Luttes Ecologique. Paris: Galilee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virilio, P. (1980). Esthetique de la Disparition. Paris: Balland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virilio, P. (1983). Pure War. New York: Semiotext(e).

    Google Scholar 

  • Virilio, P. (1984a). Guerre et Cinema. Logistique de la Perception, Paris: Editions de L’Etoile.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virilio, P. (1984b). L’espace critique. Paris: Christian Bourgeois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virilio, P. (1984c). L’Horizon Negatif. Paris: Galilee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virilio, P. (1986). Speed and politics. New York: Semiotext(e).

    Google Scholar 

  • Virilio, P. (1988). La Machine de Vision. Paris: Editions Galilee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virilio, P. (1997). The open sky. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virilio, P. (2007). The university of disaster. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogt, E. Z. (1960). On the concepts of structure and process in cultural anthropology. American Anthropologist NS, 62(1), 18–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Bertalanffy, L. (1952). Problems of life. London: Watts and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J. L. (1969). The diffusion of innovations among the American states. American Political Science Review, 63, 880–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walt, G., & Gilson, L. (1994). Reforming the health sector in developing countries: The central role of policy analysis. Health Policy and Planning, 9(4), 353–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, F. (2002). Theories of the information society. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendel, B. (1953). A migration schema; theories and observations. Series B: Lund Studies in Geography. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. N. (1925). Science and the modern world. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. N. (1929). Process and reality: An Essay in cosmology. New York: Free Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, L. L. (1944). The next development in man. London: The Cresset Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, L. L. (1954). Accent on form. Westport CO: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. C. (1951). The myth of passage. Journal of Philosophy, 48(15), 457–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (1977). Marxism and literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. Q. (1980). The politics of regulation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winsborough, H. H. (1962). City growth and city structure. Journal of Regional Science, 4(2), 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolch, J. R., & De Verteuil, G. (2003). New landscapes of urban poverty management. In J. May & N. Thrift (Eds.), Timespace (pp. 149–168). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, B. D., & Waterman, R. (1991). The dynamics of political control of bureaucracy. American Political Science Review, 85, 801–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, S. W. W. (1958). The trend of geomorphology. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 25, 29–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeeman, E. C. (1976). Catastrophe theory. Scientific American, 234, 65–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwart, P. J. (1973). The flow of time. In P. Suppes (Ed.), Space, time and geometry (pp. 131–156). Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate School of Management, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK

    Michael Roe

Authors
  1. Michael Roe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Roe .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Roe, M. (2016). Process. In: Maritime Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21747-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21747-5_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21746-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-21747-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation