Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in the Philosophy of Sociality ((SIPS,volume 5))

  • 625 Accesses

Abstract

We study a modal logic \(\mathbf{K4_{2}^{C}}\) of common belief for normal agents. We discuss Kripke completeness and show that the logic has tree model property. A main result is to prove that \(\mathbf{K4_{2}^{C}}\) is the modal logic of all T D -intersection closed, bi-topological spaces with derived set interpretation of modalities. Based on the splitting translation we also discuss connections with \(\mathbf{S4_{2}^{C}}\), the logic of common knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Lismont and Mongin (1994), treating common belief, and Steinsvold (2008), treating topological models for belief, are related works that also study weaker extensions of K4.

  2. 2.

    For the remainder of this section and later on for Theorem 9 we assume some familiarity with the modal μ-calculus. Lack of space hinders a fuller treatment, however for more details on the modal μ-calculus we refer to Blackburn et al. (2006, Part 3, Chapter 4); see also the discussion in van Benthem and Sarenac (2004).

  3. 3.

    For a discussion of the splitting translation and its application in non-monotonic modal logics, see the authors’ (Pearce and Uridia 2011a).

References

  • Aumann, Robert. 1976. Agreeing to disagree. Annals of Statistics 4(6): 1236–1239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltag, Alexandru, and Sonja Smets. 2009. Group belief dynamics under iterated revision: Fixed points and cycles of joint upgrades. In TARK, New York, 41–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltag, Alexandru, Lawrence S. Moss, and Slawomir Solecki. 1998. The logic of public announcements, common knowledge, and private suspicions. In Proceedings of the TARK’98, Evanston. Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, Jon. 1988. Three views of common knowledge. In Proceedings of the second conference on theoretical aspects of reasoning about knowledge, 365–378. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezhanishvili, Nick, and Wiebe van der Hoek. (2014). Structures for epistemic logic (survey). In Logical and informational dynamics, a volume in honour of Johan van Benthem, trends in logic, ed. A. Baltag and S. Smets. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezhanishvil, Guram, Leo Esakia, and David Gabelaia. 2005. Some results on modal axiomatization and definability for topological spaces. Studia Logica 81(3): 325–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, Patrick, Johan van Benthem, and Frank Wolter. 2006. Handbook of modal logic. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science & Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chellas, Brian F. 1980. Modal logic – An introduction, 295 p. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Engelking, Ryszard. 1977. General topology. Warsaw: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esakia, Leo. 2001. Weak transitivity – Restitution. Logical Studies 8: 244–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esakia, Leo. 2004. Intuitionistic logic and modality via topology. Annals of Pure Applied Logic 127(1–3): 155–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagin, Ronald, Joseph Y. Halpern, Yoram Moses, and Moshe Y. Vardi. 1995. Reasoning about knowledge. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, M.J., and R.E. Ladner. 1979. Propositional dynamic logic of regular programs. Journal of Computer Sciences 18: 194–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabelaia, David. 2004. Topological, algebraic and spati-temporal semantics for multi-dimentional modal logics. PhD thesis, King’s College, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, Helle Hvid, Clemens Kupke, and Eric Pacuit. (2009). Neighbourhood structures: Bisimilarity and basic model theory. Logical Methods in Computer Science 5(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzig, Andreas, Tiago De Lima, and Emiliano Lorini. 2009. On the dynamics of institutional agreements. Synthese 171(2): 321–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David. 1969. Convention: A philosophical study. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lismont, Luc, and Philippe Mongin. 1994. On the logic of common belief and common knowledge. Theory and Decision 37: 75–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucero-Bryan, Joel. 2011. The d-logic of rational numbers: A new proof. Studia Logica – An International Journal for Symbolic Logic – SLOGICA 97(2): 265–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinsey, Jon, and Alfred Tarski. 1944. The algebra of topology. Annals of Mathematics 45: 141–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, David, and Levan Uridia. 2010. Minimal knowledge and belief via minimal topology. In Logics in artificial intelligence, Proceedings of JELIA 2010, LNAI 6341, ed. T. Janhunen, I. Niemela, 273–285. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, David, and Levan Uridia. 2011a. The Gödel and the splitting translations. In Nonmonotonic reasoning, Studies in Logic, vol. 31, ed. G. Brewka, V. Marek, and M. Truszczynski, 335–360. London: College Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, David, and Levan Uridia. 2011b. An approach to minimal belief via objective belief. In Proceedings of the 22nd international joint conference on artificial intelligence, IJCAI 11, Barcelona, ed. T. Walsh, 1045–1050.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shehtman, Valentin. 1990. Derived sets in Euclidean spaces and modal logic. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam. X-1990-05.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smullyan, Raymond. 1986. Logicians who reason about themselves. In Proceedings of the conference on theoretical aspects of reasoning about knowledge, 341–352. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, Robert. Common ground. 2001. Linguistics and Philosophy 25(5–6): 701–721.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinsvold, Christopher. 2008. A grim semantics for logics of belief. Journal of Philosophical Logic 37: 45–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinsvold, Christopher. 2009. Topological models of belief logics. PhD theis, VDM Verlag, Aug 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Benthem, Johan. 2007. Rational dynamics and epistemic logic in games. International Game Theory Review 9: 13–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Benthem, Johan, and Darko Sarenac. 2004. The geometry of knowledge. In Aspects of universal logic, Travaux de logique, vol. 17, eds. J.-Y. Beziau, A. Costa Leite, and A. Facchini, 1–31. Neuchâtel: Centre de recherches sémiologiques/Université de Neuchâtel.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

An earlier version of this chapter was presented at the conference on Agreement Technologies, AT2012, 15–16 October 2012, Dubrovnik, Croatia. The authors are grateful to anonymous reviewers whose comments helped to improve readability. This research has been partially supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation through the AT project CSD2007-0022 and MCICINN project TiN2009-14562-CO5, by the Shota Rustaveli National Science Foundation project 52/05 (PG/72/4-102/13) and by SINTELNET, the European Network for Social Intelligence.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Pearce .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pearce, D., Uridia, L. (2015). The Topology of Common Belief. In: Herzig, A., Lorini, E. (eds) The Cognitive Foundations of Group Attitudes and Social Interaction. Studies in the Philosophy of Sociality, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21732-1_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics