The High North pp 157-193 | Cite as

The High North as the Area of International Cooperation



The strong commitment of the states to the Arctic matters is considered natural. In this unique and vulnerable region, the Arctic states have not only obvious interests but also a long history of solving problems together. It does not mean, however, that the traditional activity of these states were brought about by the new context of international relations only, or that it is only a result of rich history, or realization of the need for joint actions to meet the challenges and opportunities posed by globalization processes. That region will most probably continue its cooperation to a large degree motivated by and based on its own internal tradition, cohesion and experience. Flexibility and ability of adapting actions to the new needs will remain its strong point. Hence it is hardly surprising that the Nordic states, with their typical pragmatic approach, voice their concern about the developments in the High North. For them this area, and the Arctic in particular, is a sub-region determining social and economic developments, and in which serious and very evident ecological challenges are to be met. For obvious reasons, a special role has been assumed by Norway and Denmark, although all Nordic states are in favor of engaging the EU and NATO in the matters of the High North. Naturally, they are of the opinion that those two organizations are capable of strengthening their own position vis-à-vis the other players, and above all towards the Russian Federation and the USA.


European high north Nordic cooperation Arctic council EU policy Role of NATO 


  1. A Parliamentary Resolution on Iceland’s Arctic Policy. Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Iceland. (2011). Retrieved April 20, 2012, from
  2. ABA—Arctic Biodiversity Assessment. Retrieved November 13, 2013 from
  3. About the Nordic Council. Norden. Retrieved May 10, 2012, from
  4. ACIA. (2000). Arctic climate impact assessment (ACIA): An assessment of consequences of climate variability and change and the effects of increased UV in the Arctic Region: Implementation plan. Oslo, Norway: Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme.Google Scholar
  5. Aftenposten. (2007, February 21).Google Scholar
  6. Airoldi, A. (2008). The European Union and the Arctic: Policies and actions. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.Google Scholar
  7. Airoldi, A. (2010). European Union and the Arctic: Main developments July 2008–July 2010. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.Google Scholar
  8. AMSA—Arctic Marine Shipping Assessment Report. (2009). Retrieved January 3, 2014, from
  9. Arctic Climate Impact Assessment—ACIA. (2005). Retrieved November 15, 2013, from
  10. Arctic Cooperation. The Nordic Council of Ministers’ Arctic co-operation programme 2009–2011, 2009:41. Retrieved May 10, 2012, from
  11. Arctic offshore oil and gas guidelines. (2009). Retrieved December 20, 2013, from
  12. Barrow Declaration. The second ministerial meeting of the Arctic Council, Barrow, Alaska, USA, 13 October 2000. Retrieved from
  13. CBMP—Circumpolar Biodiversity Monitoring Program. Retrieved November 12, 2013, from
  14. Climate change and international security. Paper from the high representative and the European commission to the European Council, S113/08. (2008). Retrieved August 10, 2012, from
  15. Collins, T. (2012). Eyeing resources, India, China, Brazil, Japan, other countries want a voice on Arctic Council. Retrieved June 10, 2012, from–01/wadg-eri010912.php
  16. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. The European Union and the Arctic Region. (2008). Retrieved July 10, 2012, from
  17. Council Conclusions on Arctic issues. 2985th Foreign Affairs Council meeting. Brussels 2009. Retrieved July 10, 2012, from
  18. Czarny, R. M. (2008). Region nordycki—Norden w perspektywie międzynarodowej. In: Modernizacja polityczna w teorii i praktyce. Transfer nowoczesnych idei, wartości, instytucji i mechanizmów (pp. 17–30). KatowiceGoogle Scholar
  19. Czarny, R. M. (2009). Dylematy energetyczne państw regionu nordyckiego (pp. 127–168). Kielce.Google Scholar
  20. Czarny, R. M. (2010). Norden—regionem zwycięskim—dyskusje wokół konceptu. In: J. Jarosiński (Ed.), Demokratyczna Polska w globalizującym się świecie (pp. 21–36). Kielce.Google Scholar
  21. Czarny, R. S. (2012). The Barents cooperation: Progress in the making. In: R. M. Czarny, R. Kubicki, A. Janowska & R. S. Czarny (Eds.), The northern spaces—contemporary issues (pp. 45–64). Warszawa-Kielce: SCANDINAVIUM.Google Scholar
  22. Czarny, R. M., & Tomala, M. (2009). Wymiar Północny Unii Europejskiej. Studium rozwoju. Kielce: Scandinavium.Google Scholar
  23. Danish Strategy. Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2011). Denmark, Greenland and the Faroe Islands: Kingdom of Denmark strategy for Arctic 2011–2020. Copenhagen: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.Google Scholar
  24. Dośpiał-Borysiak, K. (2007). Państwa nordyckie a Unia Europejska. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Sejmowe.Google Scholar
  25. Economic value of Nordic ecosystems assessed. February 05, 2013. Retrieved February 14, 2013 from
  26. Eðvarðsson, I. R. (2007). Demographic changes, labor migration and EU-enlargement—relevance for the Nordic regions. Stockholm: Nordregio.Google Scholar
  27. Einarsson, N., Nymand, J., Nilsson, A., & Young, O. R. (Eds.). (2004). Arctic Human Development Report, Stefansson Arctic Institute, Akureyri. Retrieved August 03, 2012, from
  28. Emmerentze Jervell, E., & McDonald, A. (2013, May 13). Arctic body comes in from the cold. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved July 12, 2013, from
  29. European Parliament resolution of 20 January 2011 on a sustainable EU policy for the High North. (2011). Retrieved March 20, 2012, from
  30. European Parliament resolution of 9 October 2008 on Arctic governance. (2008). Retrieved July 10, 2012, from
  31. Finnish Strategy. Prime Minister’s Office. (2010). Finland’s strategy for the Arctic Region. Helsinki: Prime Minister’s Office Publications.Google Scholar
  32. Hassol, S. J. (2004). Impacts of a warming Arctic: Arctic climate impact assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Haavisto, P. (2011). Review of the Arctic Council structures. Consultant’s study (pp. 34–35). HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  34. Heininen, L., & Southcott, C. (2010). Globalization and the circumpolar north. Fairbanks: University of Alaska Press.Google Scholar
  35. Jarocki, M. (2013, May 18). Strategia NATO wobec Arktyki. Retrieved December 10, 2013, from
  36. Joint communication to the European Parliament and the council. Developing a European Union Policy towards the Arctic Region: Progress since 2008 and next steps. (2012). Retrieved August 20, 2012, from
  37. Kankaanpaa, P. (2012). Knowledge structures of the Arctic Council for sustainable development. In: T. S. Axworthy, T. Koivurova & W. Hasanat (Eds.), The Arctic Council: Its place in the future of Arctic governance. Toronto: Walter and Duncan Gordon Foundation.Google Scholar
  38. Käppylä, J., Mikkola, H. (2013). The global Arctic: The growing Arctic interests of Russia, China, the United States and the European Union. August 13, 2013. Retrieved September 01, 2013, from
  39. Ketels, Ch. (2008). Global pressure—Nordic solutions? The Nordic globalization barometer 2008. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.Google Scholar
  40. Kofod, J. (2012). Arctic economic opportunities: Environmental obligations and security stakes. Economics and Security Committee, NATO Parliamentary Assembly report 2012. Retrieved from
  41. Koivurova, T. (2010). Limits and possibilities of the Arctic Council in a rapidly changing scene of Arctic governance. Polar Record, 46(2).Google Scholar
  42. Koivurova, T., Van der Zwaag D. L. (2007). The Arctic Council at 10 years: Retrospect and prospect. University of British Columbia Law Review 2007, 40(1), 158.Google Scholar
  43. Kubiak, K. (2012). Interesy i spory państw w Arktyce w pierwszych dekadach XXI wieku. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Trio.Google Scholar
  44. Łuszczuk, M. (2010). Obszary arktyczne w działalności Unii Europejskiej. Nowa Europa. Przegląd Natoliński 1(9).Google Scholar
  45. NARP highlights: Contributions of the Nordic Arctic Research Programme. (2005). Retrieved from
  46. NDBC—Northern Dimension Business Council: Short overview on activities. (2013, March 18). Retrieved from
  47. NDPC—The Northern Dimension Partnership on Culture. (2009).
  48. NDPF—Northern Dimension Parliamentary Forum. Brussels, March 01, 2007. Retrieved May 24, 2010, from
  49. New Arctic Cooperation Programme, Nordic Council of Ministers. (2002). Retrieved May 10, 2012, from
  50. New report maps Nordic climate emissions. Norden, February 04, 2013. Retrieved February 14, 2013, from
  51. Nordic action plan to protect the natural environment and cultural heritage of the Arctic—Greenland, Iceland and Svalbard. Nordic Council of Ministers. (1999). Retrieved May 10, 2012 from
  52. Norway’s Strategy. (2006). The Norwegian Government’s High North strategy. Oslo: Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.Google Scholar
  53. Norway’s Strategy. (2011). The High North: Vision and strategies. Oslo: Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.Google Scholar
  54. Nuuk Declaration. The Seventh Ministerial Meeting of the Arctic Council. May 12, 2011. Nuuk, Greenland. Retrieved from
  55. Osica, O., & Natolin, Centrum Europejskie. (2010). Daleka Północ jako nowy obszar współpracy i rywalizacji. Warszawa: Centrum Europejskie Natolin.Google Scholar
  56. Ottawa Declaration, Declaration on the establishment of the Arctic Council, 1996. Retrieved from
  57. Parliamentary Conference on the Northern Dimension. Conference Statement 1 March 2007. Retrieved from
  58. Piotrowski, B. (2006). Integracja Skandynawii. Od Rady Nordyckiej do wspólnoty europejskiej. Poznań.Google Scholar
  59. Ronson, A. (2011). Political climate change: The evolving role of the Arctic council. The Northern Review 33(Spring 2011).Google Scholar
  60. RPA—Arctic regional programme of action. Retrieved October 05, 2013, from Retrieved May 24, 2010, from
  61. SDWG—Sustainable Development Working Group 2011–2013 Work Plan, 2011. Retrieved July 16, 2013, from
  62. Sellheim, N. (2012). The establishment of the permanent Arctic Council secretariat: challenges and opportunities. In T. S. Axworthy, T. Koivurova, & W. Hasanat (Eds.), The Arctic council: Its place in the future of arctic governance. Toronto: Walter and Duncan Gordon Foundation.Google Scholar
  63. Somby, L. I. (2008). Arctic council: Strong partnership between indigenous peoples and Arctic governments. Retrieved August 10, 2012, from
  64. Stokke, O. S. (2007). Nordic Council of Ministers’ Arctic co-operation 2003–2005: An evaluation. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.Google Scholar
  65. Strand, K. (2006). Rapid changes in the Arctic: Results book of the Nordic Arctic Research Programme (NARP). Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.Google Scholar
  66. Strategy for the preparation of the ACIA Policy Document, Annex 9 to the SAO Report to the Ministers, 2000. Retrieved October 03, 2012 from
  67. Sustainable development in the Arctic. The Nordic Council of Ministers’ Arctic Co-operation Programme 2012–2014, Copenhagen 2012. Retrieved September 1, 2012, from
  68. Sweden’s strategy for the Arctic region. (2011). Stockholm: Ministry for Foreign Affairs, Department for Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Retrieved from
  69. Szacawa, D. (2013). Struktury współpracy subregionalnej w Europie Północnej: Rada Państw Morza Bałtyckiego, Euroarktyczna Rada Morza Barentsa i Rada Arktyczna. In: M. Łuszczuk (Ed.), Arktyka na początku XXI wieku. Między współpracą a rywalizacją. LublinGoogle Scholar
  70. Szypowski, S. (2011). Arktyczna ósemka. Retrieved June 10, 2012, from,arktyczna_osemka.html
  71. Task Force for Institutional Issues TFII. Nuuk Declaration. The seventh ministerial meeting of the Arctic Council. May 12, 2011. Nuuk, Greenland. Retrieved from
  72. The Arctic needs climate first aid! Norden. March 27, 2012. Retrieved April 19, 2012, from
  73. The EU should set more ambitious climate targets before 2030. The Nordic Council: Norden. Retrieved July 03, 2014, from
  74. The Nordic Council of Ministers. Retrieved May 10, 2012, from
  75. Topmøde på Grønland om Arktis. Norden, May 28, 2008. Retrieved October 15, 2012, from
  76. Total Economy Database. (2008, January). The Conference Board and Groningen Growth and Development Centre. Retrieved April 08, 2008, from
  77. Zakrzewska, J. (2013). Security in the High North: NATO’s role. Sub-committee on transatlantic relations, NATO Parliamentary Assembly draft report 2013. Retrieved from

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jan Kochanowski UniversityKielcePoland

Personalised recommendations