The High North



The High North is currently one of the key areas on a global scale whose importance for Europe cannot be overestimated. It also concerns the regions of the USA and Canada (which are sometimes referred to as Far North), but in the European context—which is the subject matter of this work—it encompasses both a part of the continent, and the islands as well as the seas (the Barents Sea, the Greenland Sea) situated beyond the polar circle. In the era of high prices of energy resources and climate warming, the region is characterized by a high level of activity and also a certain nervousness of the states of that region, both of which influence international relations on a scale going beyond the interests of our hemisphere only. In practice, that involves a clear orientation of interests, and not political rhetoric only, the more so as the region truly possesses a high potential allowing for economic growth in at least a few sectors.


Key area globally Discoveries, scientific research International interests Arctic resources Arctic sea routes 


  1. ACIA. (2005). Arctic climate impact assessment. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Adapting to Change: UK Policy Towards the Arctic. (2013). The UK’s Foreign & Commonwealth Office. Retrieved December 19, 2013 from
  3. Ahlenius, H. (Ed.). (2012). Vital Arctic graphics, people and global heritage on our last wild shores (p. 6). Arendal, Norway: UNEP/GRID-Arendal. Retrieved December 18, 2012 from
  4. Anioł, W. (2010). Arktyka – obszar konfliktów czy współpracy. Polski Przegląd Dyplomatyczny, Nr 5–6 (91–108). Warszawa: PISM.Google Scholar
  5. Arctic Governance in an Era of Transformative Change. (2010). Critical Questions, Governance Principles, Ways Forward. Report of the Arctic Governance Project. Retrieved March 15, 2011 from
  6. Arctic Governance Project. (2010). Arctic Governance in an Era of Transformative Change: Critical Questions, Governance Principles, Ways Forward. Report of the Arctic Governance Project. 14 April 2010. Retrieved March 15, 2011 from
  7. Bennett, M. (2012, September 18). South Korea and Norway sign memoranda of understanding on Arctic shipping and shipbuilding. Cryopolitics. Retrieved November 17, 2012 from
  8. BP Statistical Review 2011.Google Scholar
  9. Denmark, Greenland and the Faroe Islands: Kingdom of Denmark Strategy for Arctic 2011-2020. Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2011). Copenhagen: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.Google Scholar
  10. Depledge, D., Dodds, K. (2011). The UK and the Arctic. The Strategic Gap. Rusi Journal, 156(3), 74.Google Scholar
  11. Eom, S.-H. (2011). The Arctic fisheries regime and its implications to Korea. International Journal of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, 3(1), 33–48. Retrieved November 01, 2012 from
  12. Fujiwara, Y. (2010) Japan latest non-Arctic country to claim stake in North Pole. Retrieved January 10, 2013 from
  13. Geographical Coverage. Retrieved November 10, 2012 from If we click on “About AMAP,” and then go to the tab “Geographical coverage,” we may follow the discussion on the subject.
  14. Geopolitics in the High North: Multiple Actors. Norwegian Interest. Retrieved March 23, 2011 from
  15. Godlewski, P. (2012). Nowy “Jedwabny Szlak.” Chińska polityka ekonomiczna ropy naftowej. Retrieved October 11, 2012 from,1141,Nowy_?Jedwabny_Szlak?_Chinska_polityka_ekonomiczna_ropy_naftowej.
  16. Goszczko, J. (2012). Zamarzanie wody i lód morski. In: Arktyka europejska – morski przewodnik użytkownika. Sopot: Instytut Oceanologii PAN. The subject of the ice fauna and flora is discussed by M. Głuchowska in the same work on p. 88.Google Scholar
  17. Groβe, G., Wagner, D., Schirrmeister, L. (2006). Remote sensing in Arctic periglacial landscapes—the tracing of permafrost dynamics. In: Research Highlights 2006 (pp. 57–60). Bremerhaven: Alfred—Wegener—Institut.Google Scholar
  18. Grzela, J. (2012). Interesy krajów azjatyckich na Dalekiej Północy; paper delivered at the Conference “Arktyka z perspektywy pierwszej dekady XXI wieku. Między rywalizacją i współpracą,” Wrocław, October 23–24, 2012.Google Scholar
  19. Hassol, S. J. (2004). Impacts of a warming Arctic (Executive Summary) (p. 4). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved January 12, 2013 from;
  20. Haykowski, M. (2011). Islandia-Chiny-biznes-motywy-media, Stockholm /IAR/, September 01, 2011.Google Scholar
  21. IASC Bulletin 08/09. (2010). Climate change and the cryosphere: Snow, water, ice and permafrost in the Arctic (SWIPA), Potsdam 2010, pp. 73–76.Google Scholar
  22. Interests and roles of non-Arctic states in the Arctic. (2012). Seminar presented by the National Capital Branch of the Canadian International, Council and the Munk-Gordon Arctic Security Program, Ottawa, October 5, 2011. Retrieved May 15, 2012 from
  23. Jakobson, L., & Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. (2010). China prepares for an ice-free Arctic. Solna, Sweden: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.Google Scholar
  24. Jensen, L. C. & Hønneland, G. (2011). Framing the High North: Public Discourses in Norway after 2000. Tromsø: Acta Borealia, 28(1), 54.Google Scholar
  25. Kaiser (2010) Polar science and global climate. An international resource for education and outreach. In B. Kaiser (Ed.). London.Google Scholar
  26. Killaby, G. (2005–2006) Great game in the cold climate: Canada’s Arctic sovereignty in question. Canadian Military Journal, Winter 2005–2006, p. 32.Google Scholar
  27. Kubiak, K. (2009). Interesy i spory państw w Arktyce. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Dolnośląskiej Szkoły Wyższej.Google Scholar
  28. Kubiak, K. (2012). Interesy i spory państw w Arktyce w pierwszych dekadach XXI wieku. Wydawnictwo Trio: Warszawa.Google Scholar
  29. Kubka, A. (2011). Norweskie interesy w globalizującym się świecie. In: R. M. Czarny (Ed.), Studia Humanistyczno-Społeczne, v. 5. Kielce.Google Scholar
  30. Kublik, A. (2013, January 21). Grenlandia, Chinlandia. Gazeta Wyborcza. Google Scholar
  31. Łomczewski, K., Zalewski, J., Żmudziński, L. (1979). Morze Arktyczne. Warszawa.Google Scholar
  32. Maj-Szatkowska, J. (2004). Oceany, morza. Leksykon. Warszawa: Wiedza Powszechna.Google Scholar
  33. Makowski, A., & Rossa, D. (2011). Współpraca akwenowa w regionie Arktyki i Antarktyki. In D. Rossa (Ed.), Współpraca akwenowa państw we współczesnych stosunkach międzynarodowych. Poznań: Instytut Naukowo-Wydawniczy Maiuscula.Google Scholar
  34. Mitra, D. (2012). Taking cue from China, India eyeing Arctic region. Retrieved December 05, 2012 from
  35. Młynarski, T. (2011a). Unia Europejska wobec Arktyki. Klimatyczno – energetyczne aspekty polityki arktycznej wybranych państw członkowskich. From the article submitted to Atheneum, 2013, p. 12. After Michel Rocard, L’avenir de l’Arctique est l’affaire de tous ses futurs usagers. Le Monde, May 14, 2011.Google Scholar
  36. Młynarski, T. (2011b). Bezpieczeństwo energetyczne w pierwszej dekadzie XXI wieku. Mozaika interesów i geostrategii. Kraków, pp. 217–260.Google Scholar
  37. Moskalik, M. (2012) Retrieved May 30, 2012 from
  38. Nazarri, M. (1998). Arktyka Ziemia Wiecznych Lodów. Warszawa: Ars Polona.Google Scholar
  39. O’Rourke, R., Library of Congress & United States. (2012). Changes in the Arctic: Background and issues for congress. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
  40. O’Rourke, R. (2012). Changes in the Arctic: Background and issues for congress. CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Congressional Research Service, August 1, 2012, 7–5700, R41153, p. 3.
  41. Osica, O., & Centrum Europejskie Natolin. (2010). Daleka Północ jako nowy obszar współpracy i rywalizacji. Warszawa: Centrum Europejskie Natolin.Google Scholar
  42. Reflections on the state of select scientific fields in Poland as assessed by the Integrative and Integrative-Expert Teams of the Polish Academy of Sciences (PAN), Expert opinion No. 21 (pp. 615–696), Polish Polar Research. Intellectual, Institutional and Human Resources Potential, Inter-Departmental Team of Experts in Polar research of PAN, ed. by Prof. Dr. hab. A. Guterch, Warszawa: The Institute of Geophysics of PAN.Google Scholar
  43. Repelewska-Pękalowa, J., & Pękala, K. (2007). Reakcja wieloletniej zmarzliny na zmiany klimatu. In A. Styszyńska & A. A. Marsz (Eds.), Zmiany klimatyczne w Arktyce i Antarktyce w ostatnim pięćdziesięcioleciu XX wieku i ich implikacje środowiskowe. Gdynia: Wydawnictwo Uczelniane Akademii Morskiej.Google Scholar
  44. Rosyjski Rosnieft chce do rafinerii włoskiego ENI w Europie. (2012, June 24). Gazeta Wyborcza. Retrieved July 10, 2012 from,100896,12005347,Rosyjski_Rosnieft_chce_do_rafinerii_wloskiego_ENI.html#TRrelSST#ixzz2olE2kHck.
  45. Schwägerl, CH., & Seidler, Ch., (2011, March 16). Berlin Enters the Scramble for the Arctic. Der Spiegel International. Retrieved September 20, 2011 from,1518,751240,00.html.
  46. Sykulski, L. (2009). Geopolityka. Słownik terminologiczny. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.Google Scholar
  47. Symonides, J. (2011). Arktyka – region współpracy czy konfliktów. In: Stosunki międzynarodowe-International Relations, v. 44, nr 3–4.Google Scholar
  48. UK displays more interest in Arctic security Retrieved. Retrieved May 10, 2010 from
  49. Ulanowski, T. (2013, January 22). Światło wraca do Arktyki. Gazeta Wyborcza. Retrieved January 23, 2013 from www. Scholar
  50. Uppslagsbook, Södertälje 1985.Google Scholar
  51. Węsławski, J. M., Stempniewicz, L., & Kwaśniewski, S. (2007). Konsekwencje zmiany klimatu dla morskiego ekosystemu Arktyki Europejskiej. In A. Styszyńska & A. A. Marsz (Eds.), Zmiany klimatyczne w Arktyce i Antarktyce w ostatnim pięćdziesięcioleciu XX wieku i ich implikacje środowiskowe. Gdynia: Wydawnictwo Uczelniane Akademii Morskiej.Google Scholar
  52. Węsławski, J. M. (2012a). Ryby. In: Arktyka europejska – morski przewodnik użytkownika. Sopot: Instytut Oceanologii PAN.Google Scholar
  53. Węsławski, J. M. (2012b). Ssaki. In: Arktyka europejska – morski przewodnik użytkownika. Sopot: Instytut Oceanologii PAN.Google Scholar
  54. Paper, White. (2006). On German security policy and the future of the Bundeswehr; summary. Berlin: Federal Ministry of Defence.Google Scholar
  55. Federal Foreign Office: Guidelines of the Germany Arctic policy - Assume responsibility, seize opportunities. Retrieved November 15, 2013 from
  56. Yong, O. R., & Einarsson, N. (2004). Arctic Human Development Report (pp. 17–18). Akureyri, Iceland: Stefansson Arctic Institute. Retrieved December 20, 2012 from
  57. Young, O. R. (1985). The age of Arctic. Foreign Policy, 86(61), 160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jan Kochanowski UniversityKielcePoland

Personalised recommendations