Advertisement

Needs and Perspectives of Sustainable Air Pollution Management

  • Ramesha ChandrappaEmail author
  • Umesh Chandra Kulshrestha
Chapter
  • 1.2k Downloads
Part of the Environmental Science and Engineering book series (ESE)

Abstract

Needs and perspectives of air pollution management have changes over the time from region to region. There are considerable changes in air pollution sources on a global perspective as changes with respect to development and consumption pattern has changed the dimension of pollution. Sustainability of air pollution management not only requires technical and scientific solutions it also needs urban planning, financial instruments, regulatory setup, policy, awareness and more than anything else un-debauched decision making regulators. This chapter discusses theory and practical difficulties with respect to sustainable air pollution management.

Keywords

Kyoto Protocol Urban Heat Island Emission Trading Chicago Convention Pollution Control Equipment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Barrie, L. A. (1986). Arctic—an overview of current knowledge. Atmospheric Environment, 20, 643–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. bbca. (2014). Pollution: High levels to spread across England. http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-26844425. Accessed on 4 March 2014.
  3. bbcb. (2014). Pollution: Rise in 999 calls for breathing problems. http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-26863228. Accessed on 4 March 2014.
  4. Boutron, C. F. (1995). Historical reconstruction of the Earth’s past atmospheric environment from Greenland and Antarctic snow and ice cores. Environmental Review, 3, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Christensen, J. H., Hewitson, B., Busuioc, A., Chen, A., Gao, X., Held, I., et al. (2007). Regional climate projections. In S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K. B. Averyt, M. Tignor & H. L. Miller (Eds.), Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Chun, Y. (2000). The yellow-sand phenomenon recorded in the Chosunwangjosilok. Journal of the Meteorological Society of Korea, 36, 285–292.Google Scholar
  7. Cooper, O. R., Moody, J. L., Parrish, D. D., Trainer, M., Hplloway, J. S., Ryerson, T. B., et al. (2001). Trace gas signatures of the airstreams within North Atlantic cyclones: Case studies from the North Atlantic Regional Experiment (NARE’97) aircraft intensive. Journal of Geophysical Research, 106, 5437–5456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dvonch, J. T., Keeler, G. J., & Marsik, F. J. (2005). The influence of meteorological conditions on the wet deposition of mercury in southern Florida. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 44, 1421–1435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. EEA. (2013). Quality in Europe—2013 report. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.Google Scholar
  10. Energy Conservation Center of Japan. (2011). Japan Energy Conservation Handbook 2011. Available at: http://www.asiaeec-col.eccj.or.jp/databook/2011. Accessed on 17th April 2014, Energy Conservation Center of Japan, Tokyo, pp. 145.
  11. Guerova, G., & Jones, N. (2007). A global model study of distributions during the August 2003 heat wave in Europe. Environmental Chemistry, 4, 285–292.Google Scholar
  12. Heald, C. L., Jacob, D. J., Park, R. J., Alexander, B., Fairlie, T. D., Yantosca, R. M., et al. (2006). Transpacific transport of Asian anthropogenic aerosols and its impact on surface air quality in the United States. Journal of Geophysical Research, 111, D14310.Google Scholar
  13. Husar, R. B., et al. (2001). Asian dust events of April 1998. Journal of Geophysical Research, 106, 18317–18330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. INE-SEMARNAT. (2006). Control conjunto de las emisiones locales y globales en la zona metropolitan de Guadalajara. Informe elaborado por la Universidad de Guadalajara para el Instituto Nacional de Ecología. Guadalajara: INE-SEMARNAT.Google Scholar
  15. Jacob, D. J., & Winner, D. A. (2009). Effect of on air quality. Atmospheric Environment, 43, 51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jacob, D. J., Mauzerall, D. L., Fernández, J. M., & Pennell, W. T. (2011). Global change and quality. In G. M. Hidy, J. R. Brook, K. L. Demerjian, L. T. Molina, W. T. Pennell & R. D. Scheffe (Eds.), Technical challenges of multipollutant air quality management. New York: Springer Science + Business Media.Google Scholar
  17. Jazcilevich, A., Fuentes, V., Jauregui, E., & Luna, E. (2000). Simulated urban climate response to historical land use modification in the basin of Mexico. Climatic Change, 44, 515–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jazcilevich, A. D., Garcia, A. R., & Ruiz-Suarez, L.-G. (2003a). An modeling study using three surface coverings near the new international airport of Mexico City. Journal of the and Waste Management Association, 53, 1280–1287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jazcilevich, A. D., Garcia, A. R., Ruiz-Suarez, L. G., Cruz-Nuñez, X., Delgado, J. C., Tellez, C., & Chias, L. B. (2003b). An air quality modeling study comparing two possible sites for the new international airport for Mexico City. Journal of the and Waste Management Association, 53, 366–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jazcilevich, A. D., García, A. R., & Caetano, E. (2005). Locally induced surface air confluence by complex terrain and its effects on in the valley of Mexico. Atmospheric Environment, 39, 5481–5489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Keeler, G. J., Landis, M. S., Norris, G. A., Christianson, E. M., & Dvonch, J. T. (2006). Sources of mercury wet deposition in eastern Ohio, USA. Environmental Science and Technology, 40, 5874–5881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Klimont, Z., Cofala, J., Xing, J., Wei, W., Zhang, C., Wang, S., et al. (2009). Projections of SO2, NOx and carbonaceous aerosols emissions in Asia. Tellus B, 61, 602–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kockelman, K. (1997). Travel behavior as function of accessibility, land use mixing, and land use balance: Evidence from San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1607, 116–125. doi: 10.3141/1607-16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lambert, S. J., & Fyfe, J. C. (2006). Changes in winter cyclone frequencies and strengths simulated in enhanced greenhouse warming experiments: Results from the models participating in the IPCC diagnostic exercise. Climate Dynamics, 26, 713–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Li, Q., Jacob, D. J., Park, R., Wang, Y., Heald, C. L., Hudman, R., et al. (2005). North American pollution outflow and the trapping of convectively lifted pollution by upper-level anticyclone. Journal of Geophysical Research, 110, D10301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lin, C.-Y. C., Jacob, D. J., & Fiore, A. M. (2001). Trends in exceedances of the air quality standard in the continental United States, 1980–1998. Atmospheric Environment, 35, 3217–3228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu, J., & Mauzerall, D. L. (2005). Estimating the average time for inter-continental transport of air pollutants. Geophysical Research Letters, 32, L11814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liu, J., & Mauzerall, D. L. (2007). Evaluating the potential influence of inter-continental transport of sulfate aerosols on air quality. Environmental Research Letters, 2, 045029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu, J., Mauzerall, D. L., & Horowitz, L. W. (2008). Source-receptor relationships between east Asian sulfur dioxide emissions and northern hemisphere sulfate concentrations. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 8, 5537–5561.Google Scholar
  30. Makra, L., & Brimblecombe, P. (2004). Selections from the history of environmental pollution, with special attention to air pollution. Part 1. International journal of environment and pollution, 22(6):641–656.Google Scholar
  31. Markham, A. (1994). A brief history of pollution. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  32. McCabe, G. J., Clark, M. P., & Serreze, M. C. (2001). Trends in northern hemisphere surface cyclone frequency and intensity. Journal of Climatology, 14, 2763–2768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mickley, L. J., Jacob, D. J., Field, B. D., & Rind, D. (2004). Effects of future on regional episodes in the United States. Geophysical Research Letters, 30, L24103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Murazaki, K., & Hess, P. (2006). How does contribute to surface change over the United States? Journal of Geophysical Research, 111, D05301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Park, R. J., Jacob, D. J., Kumar, N., & Yantosca, R. M. (2006). Regional visibility statistics in the United States: Natural and transboundary pollution influences, and implications for the regional haze rule. Atmospheric Environment, 40, 5405–5423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Permana, A. S., Perera, R., & Kumar, S. (2008). Understanding energy consumption pattern of households in different urban development forms: A comparative study in Bandung City, Indonesia. Energy Policy, 36, 4287–4297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Praveen, N. (2014). Bhopal gas tragedy: Pilot who flew Anderson to Delhi reveals ‘flight authorized by CM’, The Times of India. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Bhopal-gas-tragedy-Pilot-who-flew-Anderson-to-Delhi-reveals-flight-authorized-by-CM/articleshow/45361066.cms. Accessed on 14 February 2015.
  38. Ramesha, C., Sushil, G., & Umesh, C. K. (2011). Coping with : principles and Asian context. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  39. Seigneur, C., Vijayaraghavan, K., Lohman, K., Karamchandani, P., & Scott, C. (2004). Global source attribution for mercury deposition in the United States. Environmental Science and Technology, 38, 555–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Selin, N. E. (2005). Rising: Is global action needed to protect human health and the environment? Environment, 47, 22–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Selin, N. E., & Jacob, D. J. (2008). Seasonal and spatial patterns of mercury wet deposition in the United States: North American vs. intercontinental sources. Atmospheric Environment, 42, 5193–5204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Selin, N. E., Jacob, D. J., Park, R. J., Yantosca, R. M., Strode, S., Jaegle, L., et al. (2007). Chemical cycling and deposition of atmospheric mercury: Global constraints from observations. Journal of Geophysical Research, 112, DO2308.Google Scholar
  43. Selin, N. E., Jacob, D. J., Yantosca, R. M., Strode, S., Jaegle, L., & Sunderland, E. M. (2008) Global 3-D model for mercury: Present-day vs. pre-industrial cycles and anthropogenic enrichment factors for deposition. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 22, GB2011.Google Scholar
  44. Seto, K. C., Dhakal, S., Bigio, A., Blanco, H., Delgados, G. C., & Dewar, D. (2014). Human settlements, infrastructure and spatial planning. In O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel & J. C. Minx (Eds.), 2014: Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Singh, M. P., & Sunderrajan, P. (2014). Anderson dead, no tears in Bhopal, The Hindu. http://www.thehindu.com/news/international/world/former-union-carbide-chief-warren-anderson-wanted-in-bhopal-gas-tragedy-dies/article6551966.ece. Accessed on 14 February 2015.
  46. Stockholm stad. (2012). The Stockholm environment programme 2012–2015. Stockholm: Stockholm stad.Google Scholar
  47. Swedish Maritime Administration. (2007). Emission trading for Sulphur and Nitrogen Oxides—means to green maritime shipping, Norrköping.Google Scholar
  48. Tarrason, L., & Iversen, T. (1998). Modeling intercontinental transport of atmospheric sulfur in the northern hemisphere. Tellus, 50B, 331–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. The City of London. (2011). City of London quality strategy 2011–2015. London: City of London.Google Scholar
  50. van Donkelaar, A., Martin, R. V., Leaitch, W. R., Macdonald, A. M., Walker, T. W., Streets, D. G., et al. (2008). Analysis of aircraft and satellite measurements from the intercontinental chemical transport experiment (INTEX-B) to quantify long-range transport of East Asian sulfur to Canada. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 8, 2999–3014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wang, S. X., Zhao, B., Cai, S. Y., Klimont, Z., Nielsen, C., McElroy, M. B., et al. (2014). Emission trends and mitigation options for air pollutants in East Asia. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, 14, 2601–2674.Google Scholar
  52. Wu, Y., Wang, S., Streets, D. G., Hao, J., Chan, M., & Jiang, J. (2006). Trends in anthropogenic mercury emissions in China from 1995 to 2003. Environmental Science and Technology, 40, 5312–5318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wu, S., Mickley, L. J., Leibensperger, E. M., Jacob, D. J., Rind, D., & Streets, D. G. (2008). Effects of 2000–2050 global change on air quality in the United States. Journal of Geophysical Research, 113, D06302.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Waste Management CellKarnataka State Pollution Control BoardBangaloreIndia
  2. 2.School of Environmental SciencesJawaharlal Nehru UniversityNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations