Abstract
The paper presents a normative model which accounts for timing aspects of decision making under uncertainty. We build a model for a decision making process and then solve it, seeking the best timing to make a decision. It is based on several assumptions: information resources become more accurate over time (due to systematic improvements of a given information system), the value of utility or payoff functions deteriorates over time (moreover, loss of opportunities over time is also analyzed), and decision makers observe information only once, before making a decision. In addition, the assumptions of Bounded Rationality are integrated in the model, that is, decision makers stick to a rigid decision rule. The proposed analytical framework allows examining a decision rule over time. A cost of information gathering and a cost of decision delays are also incorporated in the model.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In terms of the Information Structure Model, if for every possible payoff matrix U, and for every a priori probability matrix Π \( \mathop {Max}\limits_{D} \left( {trace(\prod {*Q_{1} *D*U)} } \right)\; \ge \;\mathop {Max}\limits_{D} \left( {trace(\prod {*Q_{2} *D*U)} } \right) \), then Q1 is generally more informative than Q2, denoted by \( Q_{1} \ge Q_{2}. \) The Blackwell Theorem states that Q1 is generally more informative than Q2 if and only if there is a Markovian (stochastic) matrix R such that Q1*R = Q2, where R is termed the garbling matrix.
- 2.
It should be noted that the general informativeness ratio is a partial rank ordering of information structures. There is not necessarily rank order between any two information structures.
References
Ahituv, N.: A comparison of information structure for a “rigid decision rule” case. Decis. Sci. 12(3), 399–416 (1981)
Ahituv, N.: Describing the information system life cycle as an adjustment process between information and decisions. Int. J. Policy Anal. Inf. Syst. 6(2), 133–145 (1982)
Ahituv, N., Elovici, Y.: Evaluating the performance of an application running on a distributed system. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 52, 916–927 (2001)
Ahituv, N., Greenstein, G.: Systems inaccessibility and the productivity paradox. EJOR 161, 505–524 (2005)
Ahituv, N., Greenstein, G.: Evolution or revolution of organizational information technology - modeling decision makers’ perspective. JSSM 3(1), 51–66 (2010)
Ahituv, N., Ronen, B.: Orthogonal information structure - a model to evaluate the information provided by a second opinion. Decis. Sci. 19(2), 255–268 (1988)
Aronovich, L., Spiegler, I.: CM-tree: a dynamic clustered index for similarity search in metric databases. Data Knowl. Eng. 3, 919–946 (2007)
Carmi, N., Ronen, B.: An empirical application of the information-structures model: the postal authority case. EJOR 92, 615–627 (1996)
Elovici, Y., Braha, D.: A decision theoretic approach to data mining. IEEE Trans. 33(1), 42–51 (2003)
Elovici, Y., Shapira, B., Kantor, P.B.: Using the information structure model to compare profile-based information filtering. Inf. Retrieval 6(1), 75–97 (2003)
Greenstein, G., Ahituv, N.: The value of knowing that you do not know. Serdica J. Comput. 3(2), 205–226 (2009)
Margaliot, N.: Selecting a quality control attribute sample: an information-economics method. Ann. Oper. Res. 91, 83–104 (1999)
Marschak, J.: Economic of information systems. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 66, 192–219 (1971)
McGuire, C.B., Radner, R.: Decision and Organization, 2nd edn. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (1986)
Ronen, B.: An information-economics approach to quality control attribute sampling. EJOR 73, 430–442 (1994)
Rubinstein, A.: Modeling Bounded Rationality. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)
Simon, H.A.: The New Science of Management Decisions. Harper and Row, New-York (1960)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix:
Appendix:
Theorem 1
-
1.
Let Q1 and Q2 be two information structures operating on the same set of states of nature S = {S1,…,Sn}, and producing the same set of signals Y = {Y1,…,Ym}.
-
2.
Let V 2 the expected payoff (or expected utility) of Q 2 under an optimal decision rule. Let V 1 the expected payoff (or expected utility) of Q 1 of V2, by using the same given decision rule, \( V_{1} > V_{2} \)
-
3.
Let Qt an information structure, which represent the transformation over time from Q2 to Q 1.
p(t) is a monotonic Continuous function with a second derivative in the range \( 0\le {\text{t}} \le {\text{t1}} \).
-
4.
Let U(t) the utility matrix, which differs over time
-
5.
Let f(t), a function that calculates a tradeoff between availability and outcomes over time. \( f(t) = p(t)*u(t) \)
-
6.
Let C(t) the cost of collection of information over time. C(t) is a monotonic (non- decreased) derivative function over time.
Hence, a sufficient condition for a local maximum of expected utility over time is:
-
i.
\( \frac{\partial f(t)}{\partial t}*\varDelta V - \frac{\partial C(t)}{\partial t} = - \frac{\partial u(t)}{\partial t}*V_{2} \)
-
ii.
\( \frac{{\partial^{2} u(t)}}{{\left( {\partial t} \right)^{2} }}*V_{2} + \frac{{\partial^{2} f(t)}}{{\left( {\partial t} \right)^{2} }}*\varDelta V - \frac{{\partial^{2} C(t)}}{{\left( {\partial t} \right)^{2} }} < 0 \)
Proof:
-
(1)
\( trace(\varPi *Q_{t} *D_{Q2} *U(t)) = \)
-
(2)
\( = trace(\varPi *(p(t)*Q_{1} + (1 - p(t))*Q_{2} )*D_{Q2} *U(t)) = \)
-
(3)
\( = p(t)*trace(\varPi *Q_{1} *D_{Q2} *u(t)*U) + (1 - p(t))*trace(\varPi *Q_{2} *D_{Q2} *u(t)*U) = \)
-
(4)
\( = p(t)*u(t)*trace(\varPi *Q_{1}*D_{Q2}*U) + (1 - p(t))*u(t)*trace(\varPi *Q_{2}*D_{Q2}*U) \)
-
(5)
It is given that
-
(6)
Hence
-
(7)
\( = p(t)*u(t)*\left( {V_{1} - V_{2} } \right) + u(t)*V_{2} = f(t)*\varDelta V + u(t)*V_{2} \)
-
(8)
A necessary condition for existence of a local extremum is that the first degree derivative is 0:
Thus: \( \frac{\partial u(t)}{\partial t}*V_{2} + \frac{\partial f(t)}{\partial t}*\varDelta V - \frac{\partial C(t)}{\partial t} = 0 \)
-
(9)
\( \frac{\partial f(t)}{\partial t}*\varDelta V - \frac{\partial C(t)}{\partial t} = - \frac{\partial u(t)}{\partial t}*V_{2} \)
-
(10)
A sufficient condition for a local maximum is that the second degree derivative is negative, hence: \( \frac{{\partial^{2} u(t)}}{{\left( {\partial t} \right)^{2} }}*V_{2} + \frac{{\partial^{2} f(t)}}{{\left( {\partial t} \right)^{2} }}*\varDelta V - \frac{{\partial^{2} C(t)}}{{\left( {\partial t} \right)^{2} }} < 0 \)
Q.E.D
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Greenstein, G. (2015). Timing and Decision Making. In: Linden, I., Liu, S., Dargam, F., Hernández, J.E. (eds) Decision Support Systems IV – Information and Knowledge Management in Decision Processes. EWG-DSS EWG-DSS 2014 2014. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 221. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21536-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21536-5_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21535-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-21536-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)