Skip to main content

Abstract

The paper presents a normative model which accounts for timing aspects of decision making under uncertainty. We build a model for a decision making process and then solve it, seeking the best timing to make a decision. It is based on several assumptions: information resources become more accurate over time (due to systematic improvements of a given information system), the value of utility or payoff functions deteriorates over time (moreover, loss of opportunities over time is also analyzed), and decision makers observe information only once, before making a decision. In addition, the assumptions of Bounded Rationality are integrated in the model, that is, decision makers stick to a rigid decision rule. The proposed analytical framework allows examining a decision rule over time. A cost of information gathering and a cost of decision delays are also incorporated in the model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In terms of the Information Structure Model, if for every possible payoff matrix U, and for every a priori probability matrix Π \( \mathop {Max}\limits_{D} \left( {trace(\prod {*Q_{1} *D*U)} } \right)\; \ge \;\mathop {Max}\limits_{D} \left( {trace(\prod {*Q_{2} *D*U)} } \right) \), then Q1 is generally more informative than Q2, denoted by \( Q_{1} \ge Q_{2}. \) The Blackwell Theorem states that Q1 is generally more informative than Q2 if and only if there is a Markovian (stochastic) matrix R such that Q1*R = Q2, where R is termed the garbling matrix.

  2. 2.

    It should be noted that the general informativeness ratio is a partial rank ordering of information structures. There is not necessarily rank order between any two information structures.

References

  1. Ahituv, N.: A comparison of information structure for a “rigid decision rule” case. Decis. Sci. 12(3), 399–416 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahituv, N.: Describing the information system life cycle as an adjustment process between information and decisions. Int. J. Policy Anal. Inf. Syst. 6(2), 133–145 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ahituv, N., Elovici, Y.: Evaluating the performance of an application running on a distributed system. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 52, 916–927 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ahituv, N., Greenstein, G.: Systems inaccessibility and the productivity paradox. EJOR 161, 505–524 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ahituv, N., Greenstein, G.: Evolution or revolution of organizational information technology - modeling decision makers’ perspective. JSSM 3(1), 51–66 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ahituv, N., Ronen, B.: Orthogonal information structure - a model to evaluate the information provided by a second opinion. Decis. Sci. 19(2), 255–268 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Aronovich, L., Spiegler, I.: CM-tree: a dynamic clustered index for similarity search in metric databases. Data Knowl. Eng. 3, 919–946 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Carmi, N., Ronen, B.: An empirical application of the information-structures model: the postal authority case. EJOR 92, 615–627 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Elovici, Y., Braha, D.: A decision theoretic approach to data mining. IEEE Trans. 33(1), 42–51 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Elovici, Y., Shapira, B., Kantor, P.B.: Using the information structure model to compare profile-based information filtering. Inf. Retrieval 6(1), 75–97 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Greenstein, G., Ahituv, N.: The value of knowing that you do not know. Serdica J. Comput. 3(2), 205–226 (2009)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Margaliot, N.: Selecting a quality control attribute sample: an information-economics method. Ann. Oper. Res. 91, 83–104 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Marschak, J.: Economic of information systems. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 66, 192–219 (1971)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. McGuire, C.B., Radner, R.: Decision and Organization, 2nd edn. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (1986)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Ronen, B.: An information-economics approach to quality control attribute sampling. EJOR 73, 430–442 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rubinstein, A.: Modeling Bounded Rationality. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Simon, H.A.: The New Science of Management Decisions. Harper and Row, New-York (1960)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gil Greenstein .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix:

Appendix:

Theorem 1

  1. 1.

    Let Q1 and Q2 be two information structures operating on the same set of states of nature S = {S1,…,Sn}, and producing the same set of signals Y = {Y1,…,Ym}.

$$ \forall p,0 \le p \le 1,\begin{array}{*{20}c} {} \\ \end{array} p*Q_{1} + (1 - p)*Q_{2} \ge Q_{2} $$
  1. 2.

    Let V 2 the expected payoff (or expected utility) of Q 2 under an optimal decision rule. Let V 1 the expected payoff (or expected utility) of Q 1 of V2, by using the same given decision rule, \( V_{1} > V_{2} \)

$$ trace(\varPi *Q_{1} *D_{Q2} *U) = V_{1} $$
$$ trace(\varPi *Q_{2} *D_{Q2} *U) = V_{2} $$
$$ V_{1} > V_{2} , \begin{array}{*{20}c} {} & {} \\ \end{array} \varDelta V = V_{1} - V_{2} > 0 $$
  1. 3.

    Let Qt an information structure, which represent the transformation over time from Q2 to Q 1.

$$ Q_{t} = p(t)*Q_{1} + (1 - p(t))*Q_{2} $$
$$ \left\{ \begin{aligned} & p(0) = 0 \\ & p(t1) = 1 \\ & t1 > t2 > t3 \ge 0 \Rightarrow 1 > p(t2) \ge p(t3) \ge 0, \\ & t4 > t1 \Rightarrow p(t4) = 1 \\ \end{aligned} \right. $$

p(t) is a monotonic Continuous function with a second derivative in the range \( 0\le {\text{t}} \le {\text{t1}} \).

  1. 4.

    Let U(t) the utility matrix, which differs over time

$$ U_{\left( t \right)} = u\left( t \right)^{ * } \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {U_{1,1} } & \ldots & {U_{1,n} } \\ . & {} & {} \\ . & {} & {} \\ . & {} & {} \\ {U_{k,1} } & \ldots & {U_{k,n} } \\ \end{array} } \right) = u\left( t \right) * U $$
  1. 5.

    Let f(t), a function that calculates a tradeoff between availability and outcomes over time. \( f(t) = p(t)*u(t) \)

  2. 6.

    Let C(t) the cost of collection of information over time. C(t) is a monotonic (non- decreased) derivative function over time.

Hence, a sufficient condition for a local maximum of expected utility over time is:

  1. i.

    \( \frac{\partial f(t)}{\partial t}*\varDelta V - \frac{\partial C(t)}{\partial t} = - \frac{\partial u(t)}{\partial t}*V_{2} \)

  2. ii.

    \( \frac{{\partial^{2} u(t)}}{{\left( {\partial t} \right)^{2} }}*V_{2} + \frac{{\partial^{2} f(t)}}{{\left( {\partial t} \right)^{2} }}*\varDelta V - \frac{{\partial^{2} C(t)}}{{\left( {\partial t} \right)^{2} }} < 0 \)

Proof:

  1. (1)

    \( trace(\varPi *Q_{t} *D_{Q2} *U(t)) = \)

  2. (2)

    \( = trace(\varPi *(p(t)*Q_{1} + (1 - p(t))*Q_{2} )*D_{Q2} *U(t)) = \)

  3. (3)

    \( = p(t)*trace(\varPi *Q_{1} *D_{Q2} *u(t)*U) + (1 - p(t))*trace(\varPi *Q_{2} *D_{Q2} *u(t)*U) = \)

  4. (4)

    \( = p(t)*u(t)*trace(\varPi *Q_{1}*D_{Q2}*U) + (1 - p(t))*u(t)*trace(\varPi *Q_{2}*D_{Q2}*U) \)

  5. (5)

    It is given that

$$ trace(\varPi *Q_{1} *D_{Q2} *U) = V_{1} $$
$$ trace(\varPi *Q_{2} *D_{Q2} *U) = V_{2} $$
  1. (6)

    Hence

$$ p(t)*u(t)*trace(\varPi *Q_{1} *D_{Q2} *U) + (1 - p(t))*u(t)*trace(\varPi *Q_{2} *D_{Q2} *u(t)*U) = $$
$$ = p(t)*u(t)*V_{1} + (1 - p(t))*u(t)*V_{2} $$
  1. (7)

    \( = p(t)*u(t)*\left( {V_{1} - V_{2} } \right) + u(t)*V_{2} = f(t)*\varDelta V + u(t)*V_{2} \)

  2. (8)

    A necessary condition for existence of a local extremum is that the first degree derivative is 0:

$$ \frac{\partial }{\partial t}\left[ {\left( {trace(\varPi *Q_{t} *D_{Q2} *U(t))} \right) - C(t)} \right] = 0 $$

Thus: \( \frac{\partial u(t)}{\partial t}*V_{2} + \frac{\partial f(t)}{\partial t}*\varDelta V - \frac{\partial C(t)}{\partial t} = 0 \)

  1. (9)

    \( \frac{\partial f(t)}{\partial t}*\varDelta V - \frac{\partial C(t)}{\partial t} = - \frac{\partial u(t)}{\partial t}*V_{2} \)

  2. (10)

    A sufficient condition for a local maximum is that the second degree derivative is negative, hence: \( \frac{{\partial^{2} u(t)}}{{\left( {\partial t} \right)^{2} }}*V_{2} + \frac{{\partial^{2} f(t)}}{{\left( {\partial t} \right)^{2} }}*\varDelta V - \frac{{\partial^{2} C(t)}}{{\left( {\partial t} \right)^{2} }} < 0 \)

Q.E.D

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Greenstein, G. (2015). Timing and Decision Making. In: Linden, I., Liu, S., Dargam, F., Hernández, J.E. (eds) Decision Support Systems IV – Information and Knowledge Management in Decision Processes. EWG-DSS EWG-DSS 2014 2014. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 221. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21536-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21536-5_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21535-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-21536-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics