Skip to main content

Trust and Understanding in Face-to-Face and Online Negotiations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Decision Support Systems IV – Information and Knowledge Management in Decision Processes (EWG-DSS 2014, EWG-DSS 2014)

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of social presence and synchronicity on the creation of mutual trust and understanding between conflicting parties in negotiations. An experimental study was conducted in which participants negotiated either face-to-face, through synchronous chat or through asynchronous e-mail. The results show that the high social presence in FtF communication seems to enhance the feelings of trust and understanding the negotiator has in the other party compared to the online negotiations, but not the amount of understanding and trust the other party has in him/her. Synchronicity does not seem to have an influence on the negotiation processes since both the synchronous chat and the asynchronous e-mail condition have equal scores on mutual trust and understanding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bains, G., Andrade, K., Gallant, M.M.: The potential for mediating disputes online (2013). http://www.cfcj-fcjc.org/sites/default/files/docs/hosted/17436-mediating_disputes_online.pdf

  2. Silbey, S.S., Merry, S.E.: Mediator settlement strategies. Law policy 8(1), 7–32 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Winslade, J., Monk, G., Cotter, A.: A narrative approach to the practice of mediation. Negot. J. 14(1), 21–41 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kydd, A.H.: When can mediators build trust? Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 100(3), 449–462 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Butler Jr., J.K.: Trust expectations, information sharing, climate of trust, and negotiation efficiency. Group Organ. Manage. 24(2), 217–238 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rosenoer, J., Armstrong, D., Gates, J.R.: Click with Trust. Free Press, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Keen, P., Ballance, C., Chan, S., Schrump, S.: Electronic Commerce Relationships: Trust by Design. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Deutsch, M.: Trust and suspicion. J. Conflict Resolut. 2(4), 265–279 (1958)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Parks, C., Hulbert, L.: High and low trusters’ responses to fear in a payoff matrix. J. Conflict Resolut. 39(4), 718–730 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Duarte, D., Snyder, N.: Mastering virtual teams; strategies, tools, and techniques that suceed. Jossey-Bass, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Short, J., Williams, E., Christie, B.: The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. John Wiley & Sons, London (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kiesler, S., Sproull, L.: Group decision making and communication technology. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 52, 96–123 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Alonzo, M., Aiken, M.: Flaming in electronic communication. Decis. Support Syst. 36, 205–213 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Anderson, E.D., Ansfield, M.E., DePaulo, B.M.: Love’s best habit: deception in the context of relationships. In: Philippot, P., Feldman, R., Coats, E. (eds.) The Social Context of Nonverbal Behavior: Studies in Emotion and Social Interaction, pp. 372–409. Cambridge University Press, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Valley, K.L., Moag, J., Bazerman, M.H.: A matter of trust: effects of communication on the efficiency and distribution of out-comes. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 34, 211–238 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Morris, M.W., Nadler, J., Kurtzberg, T., Thompson, L.: Schmooze or Lose: Social Friction and Lubrication in E-mail Negotiation. Northwestern Unviersity, Evanston (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  17. McGrath, J.E.: Time, interaction, and performance (TIP): a theory of groups. Small Group Res. 22(2), 147–174 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Walther, J.B., Burgoon, J.K.: Relational communication in computer mediated interaction. Hum. Commun. Res. 19(1), 50–88 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Katsh, E., Rifkin, J.: Online dispute resolution: resolving conflicts in cyberspace. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Spears, R., Lea, M.: Social influence and the influence of the social in computer-mediated communication. In: Context of computer-mediated communication, pp. 30–65. Harvester-Wheatsheaf, London (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Thompson, L., Nadler, J.: Negotiating via information technology: theory and application. J. Soc. issues 58(1), 109–124 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pesendorfer, E.A., Koeszegi, S.T.: Hot versus cool behavioural styles in electronic negotiations: the impact of communication mode. Group Decis. Negot. 15(2), 141–155 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Naquin, C.E., Paulson, G.D.: Online bargaining and interpersonal trust. J. Appl. Psychol. 88, 113–120 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tidwell, L.C., Walther, J.B.: Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations getting to know one another a bit at a time. Hum. Commun. Res. 28(3), 317–348 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Antheunis, M.L., Valkenburg, P.M., Jochen, P.: Computer-mediated communication and interpersonal attraction: an experimental test of two explanatory hypotheses. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 10(6), 831–835 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Coleman, L.H., Paternite, C.E., Sherman, R.C.: A reexamination of deindividuation in synchronous computer-mediated communication. Comput. Hum. Behav. 15, 51–65 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mallen, M.J., Day, S.X., Green, M.A.: Online versus face-to-face conversations: an examination of relational and discourse variables. Psychother. Theory Res. Pract. Train. 40(1/2), 155–163 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Siegel, J., Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S., McGuire, T.W.: Group processes in computer-mediated communication. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 37, 157–187 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Scheffé, H.: The Analysis of Variance. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1959)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yvonne van der Toorn .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

van der Toorn, Y., van der Wijst, P., Damen, D. (2015). Trust and Understanding in Face-to-Face and Online Negotiations. In: Linden, I., Liu, S., Dargam, F., Hernández, J.E. (eds) Decision Support Systems IV – Information and Knowledge Management in Decision Processes. EWG-DSS EWG-DSS 2014 2014. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 221. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21536-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21536-5_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21535-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-21536-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics