Skip to main content

A Quantum Delayed-Choice Experiment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Complexity and Control in Quantum Photonics

Part of the book series: Springer Theses ((Springer Theses))

  • 957 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter concerns the fundamental concept of wave-particle duality. We begin with an introduction to the topic, and an overview of key results from the literature.

Any other situation in quantum mechanics, it turns out, can be explained afterwards by saying, “you remember the case of the experiment with the two holes? It’s the same thing.”

Feyman

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The intensity of light in Taylor’s experiment was roughly equivalent to a candle burning at a distance of one mile. J.J. Thompson’s expectation, which turned out to be incorrect, was that the diffraction pattern should be modified in the limit of very low light levels, as the corpuscular nature of the photon appeared.

References

  1. R. Feynman, R. Leighton, M. Sands, The Feynman Lectures on Physics: Volume 1 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  2. D.Z. Albert, Quantum Mechanics and Experience (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1994)

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Arndt, O. Nairz, J. Vos-Andreae, C. Keller, G. van der Zouw, A. Zeilinger, Wave-particle duality of c60 molecules. Nature 401(6754), 680–682 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. G.I. Taylor, Interference fringes with feeble light. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 15, 114–115 (1909)

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. Jönsson, Electron diffraction at multiple slits. Am. J. Phys. 42, 4–11 (1974)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. R. Bach, D. Pope, S.-H. Liou, H. Batelaan, Controlled double-slit electron diffraction. New J. Phys. 15(3), 033018 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. N. Bohr, Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 48, 696–702 (1935). October

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. M.J.W. Hall, Prior information: how to circumvent the standard joint-measurement uncertainty relation. Phys. Rev. A 69, 052113 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Ozawa, Universally valid reformulation of the heisenberg uncertainty principle on noise and disturbance in measurement. Phys. Rev. A 67, 042105 (2003). April

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. M.M. Weston, M.J.W. Hall, M.S. Palsson, H.M. Wiseman, G.J. Pryde, Experimental test of universal complementarity relations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 220402 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. Bohm, B.J. Hiley, The Undivided Universe: An Ontological Interpretation of Quantum Theory (Routledge, London, 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  12. H. Everett, Theory of the Universal Wavefunction. Ph.D. thesis, Princeton University, 1956

    Google Scholar 

  13. J.A. Wheeler, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Academic, New York, 1978)

    Google Scholar 

  14. J.A. Wheeler, Quantum Theory and Measurement (Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 1984)

    Google Scholar 

  15. C.O. Alley, O.G. Jacubowicz, W.C. Wickes, in Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, ed. by H. Narani (Physics Society of Japan, Tokyo, 1987)

    Google Scholar 

  16. T. Hellmuth, H. Walther, A. Zajonc, W. Schleich, Delayed-choice experiments in quantum interference. Phys. Rev. A 35, 2532–2541 (1987)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. B.J. Lawson-Daku, R. Asimov, O. Gorceix, Ch. Miniatura, J. Robert, J. Baudon, Delayed choices in atom stern-gerlach interferometry. Phys. Rev. A 54, 5042–5047 (1996)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Y.-H. Kim, Y. Rong, S.P. Kulik, Y. Shih, M.O. Scully, Delayed “choice” quantum eraser. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1–5 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  19. V. Jacques, E. Wu, F. Grosshans, F. Treussart, P. Grangier, A. Aspect, J.-F. Roch. Experimental realization of wheeler’s delayed-choice gedanken experiment. Science 315(5814), 966–968 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. R. Ionicioiu, D.R. Terno, Proposal for a quantum delayed-choice experiment. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 230406 (2011). Dec

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. F. Kaiser, T. Coudreau, P. Milman, D.B. Ostrowsky, S. Tanzilli, Entanglement-enabled delayed-choice experiment. Science 338(6107), 637–640 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. T. Scheidl, R. Ursin, J. Kofler, S. Ramelow, X. Ma, T. Herbst, L. Ratschbacher, A. Fedrizzi, N.K. Langford, T. Jennewein, A. Zeilinger, Violation of local realism with freedom of choice. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 107(46), 19708–19713 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  23. M. Giustina, A. Mech, S. Ramelow, B. Wittmann, J. Kofler, J. Beyer, A. Lita, B. Calkins, T. Gerrits, S.W. Nam, R. Ursin, A. Zeilinger, Bell violation using entangled photons without the fair-sampling assumption. Nature 497, 227–230 (2013). May

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. W. Durant, The Story of Civilization: Part II: The Life of Greece (Simon and Schuster, New York, 1939)

    Google Scholar 

  25. I. Newton, Opticks, or a Treatise of the Reflections, Refractions, Inflections and Colours of Light. (William Innys, 1704)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Shadbolt .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shadbolt, P. (2016). A Quantum Delayed-Choice Experiment. In: Complexity and Control in Quantum Photonics. Springer Theses. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21518-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics