Skip to main content

Multi-Objective Surrogate Based Optimization of Gas Cyclones Using Support Vector Machines and CFD Simulations

  • Chapter
Application of Surrogate-based Global Optimization to Aerodynamic Design

Part of the book series: Springer Tracts in Mechanical Engineering ((STME))

Abstract

In order to accurately predict the complex nonlinear relationships between the cyclone performance parameters (The Euler and Stokes numbers) and the four significant geometrical dimensions (the inlet section height and width, the vortex finder diameter and the cyclone total height), the support vector machines approach has been used. Two support vector regression surrogates (SVR) have been trained and tested by CFD datasets. The result demonstrates that SVR can offer an alternative and powerful approach to model the performance parameters. The SVR model parameters have been optimized to obtain the most accurate results from the cross validation steps. SVR (with optimized parameters) can offer an alternative and powerful approach to model the performance parameters better than Kriging. SVR surrogates have been employed to study the effect of the four geometrical parameters on the cyclone performance. The genetic algorithms optimization technique has been applied to obtain a new geometrical ratio for minimum Euler number and for minimum Euler and Stokes numbers. New cyclones over-perform the standard Stairmand design performance. Pareto optimal solutions have been obtained and a new correlation between the Euler and Stokes numbers is fitted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Zhao B (2009) Modeling pressure drop coefficient for cyclone separators a support vector machine approach. Chem Eng Sci 64:4131–4136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Elsayed K, Lacor C (2011) The effect of cyclone inlet dimensions on the flow pattern and performance. Appl Math Model 35(4):1952–1968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Elsayed K, Lacor C (2010) Optimization of the cyclone separator geometry for minimum pressure drop using mathematical models and CFD simulations. Chem Eng Sci 65(22):6048–6058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Elsayed K, Lacor C (2011) Numerical modeling of the flow field and performance in cyclones of different cone-tip diameters. Comput Fluids 51(1):48–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Elsayed K, Lacor C (2011) Modeling, analysis and optimization of aircyclones using artificial neural network, response surface methodology and CFD simulation approaches. Powder Technol 212(1):115–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Elsayed K, Lacor C (2012) Modeling and pareto optimization of gas cyclone separator performance using RBF type artificial neural networks and genetic algorithms. Powder Technol 217:84–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Elsayed K, Lacor C (2013) CFD modeling and multi-objective optimization of cyclone geometry using desirability function, artificial neural networks and genetic algorithms. Appl Math Model 37(8):5680–5704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Elsayed K, Lacor C (2013) The effect of cyclone vortex finder dimensions on the flow pattern and performance using LES. Comput Fluids 71:224–239

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Elsayed K, Lacor C (2014) CFD-based analysis and optimization of gas cyclones performance. In: International energy and environment foundation (IEEF), Chap 8, pp 223–276. ISBN 13: 978-1-49487-575-6

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hoffmann AC, Stein LE (2008) Gas cyclones and swirl tubes: principle, design and operation, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  11. Derksen JJ, Sundaresan S, van den Akker HEA (2006) Simulation of mass-loading effects in gas–solid cyclone separators. Powder Technol 163:59–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Xiang R, Park SH, Lee KW (2001) Effects of cone dimension on cyclone performance. J Aerosol Sci 32(4):549–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Stairmand CJ (1951) The design and performance of cyclone separators. Ind Eng Chem 29:356–383

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ramachandran G, Leith D, Dirgo J, Feldman H (1991) Cyclone optimization based on a new empirical model for pressure drop. Aerosol Sci Technol 15:135–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu S, Xu L, Li D, Li Q, Jiang Y, Tai H, Zeng L (2013) Prediction of dissolved oxygen content in river crab culture based on least squares support vector regression optimized by improved particle swarm optimization. Comput Electron Agric 95:82–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Suykens JAK, Gestel TV, Brabanter JD, Moor BD, Vandewalle J (2002) Least squares support vector machines. World Scientific, Singapore

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Baylar A, Hanbay D, Batan M (2009) Application of least square support vector machines in the prediction of aeration performance of plunging overfall jets from weirs. Expert Syst Appl 36(4):8368–8374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Singh KP, Basant N, Gupta S, Sinha S (2011) Support vector machines in water quality management: a case study. Anal Chim Acta 703:152–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Samui P (2011) Application of least square support vector machine (lssvm) for determination of evaporation losses in reservoirs. Engineering 3(4):431–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Elsayed K, Lacor C (2013) Comparison of Kriging, RBFNN, RBF and polynomial regression surrogates in design optimization. In: Eleventh international conference of fluid dynamics (ICFD11), Alexandria

    Google Scholar 

  21. Elsayed K, Lacor C (2014) Robust parameter design optimization using Kriging, RBF and RBFNN with gradient-based and evolutionary optimization techniques. Appl Math Comput 236:325–344

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Nelder JA, Mead R (1965) A simplex method for function minimization. Comput J 7(4):308–313

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Holland JH (1975) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  24. Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6:182–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fortin F-A, De Rainville F-M, Gardner M-A, Parizeau M, Gagne C (2012) Deap: evolutionary algorithms made easy. J Mach Learn Res 13:2171–2175

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Bressert E (2012) SciPy and NumPy: an overview for developers. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khairy Elsayed .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Elsayed, K., Lacor, C. (2016). Multi-Objective Surrogate Based Optimization of Gas Cyclones Using Support Vector Machines and CFD Simulations. In: Iuliano, E., Pérez, E. (eds) Application of Surrogate-based Global Optimization to Aerodynamic Design. Springer Tracts in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21506-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21506-8_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21505-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-21506-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics