Advertisement

Multicriteria Prioritization for Multistage Implementation of Complex Urban Renewal Projects

  • Teresa Cilona
  • Maria Fiorella GranataEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9157)

Abstract

Renewal projects on neighborhood scale often include several sub-projects aiming at fulfill the different functions of urban areas, while public funds or activated public-private partnership can be insufficient to face the implementation of subprojects simultaneously. Therefore single parts of wider projects are frequently realized at different period of time, according to the availability of public funds or the interest of private partners in the most profitable projects. Although a major organizational effort of funding could be necessary, a more rational approach is required, which will be able to identify the most suitable sequence of realization ensuring the greatest advantage if non-completion of the entire urban renewal project occurs or during the time of its fulfillment which is usually long. This paper proposes a multi-criteria and multistage evaluation model supporting prioritization of sub-projects belonging to a wider renewal plan. The model is applied to a real world decision problem.

Keywords

Multiple-criteria and multistage prioritization Dynamic decision-making Promethee Urban renewal 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    European Sustainable Cities and Towns Conference. http://ec.europa.eu
  2. 2.
    European Environment agency: The European Environment. State and Outlook 2010. Land use. EEA, Copenhagen (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brandon, P.S., Lombardi, P.: Evaluating sustainable development. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rizzo, F.: Il capitale sociale della città. FrancoAngeli, Milano (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Moore-Cherry, N., Vinci, I.: Urban regeneration and the economic crisis: past development and future challenges in Dublin, Ireland. Planum. The Journal of Urbanism 25(2), 1–16 (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Plöger, J., Kohlhaas-Weber, I.: Shock-proof cities? The impact of and responses to the recent financial and economic crisis in older industrial cities. Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal 7(2), 1–14 (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kool, H.: Preface. In: Wassenberg, F., van Dijken, K.: A practitioner’s view on neighbourhood regeneration, The Haugue, The Netherlands, pp. 3–4 (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stanghellini, S., Copiello, S.: Urban models in italy: partnership forms, territorial contexts, tools, results. In: Dalla Longa, R. (ed.) Urban Models and Public-Private Partnership, pp. 47–130. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Campanella, G., Ribeiro, R.A.: A framework for dynamic multiple-criteria decision making. Decision Support Systems 52, 52–60 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Edwards, W.: Dynamyc decision theory and probabilistic information processing. Human Factors 4, 59–73 (1962)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fox, J., Cooper, R.P., Glasspool, D.W.: A canonical theory of dynamic decision-making. Frontiers in Psycology 4, 1–19 (2013). art. 150Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bellman, R.: Applied Dynamic Programming. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1957)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Da Costa, C.G., Buede, D.M.: Dynamic Decision Making: A Comparison of Approaches. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 9, 243–262 (2000)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gonzales, C., Vanyukov, P., Martin, M.K.: The use of micro worlds to study dynamic decision making. Computers in Human Behavior 21(2), 273–286 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Busemeyer, J.R., Pleshoc, T.J.: Theoretical tools for understanding and aiding dynamic decision making. Journal of Mathematical Psycology 53, 126–138 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Saaty, T.L.: Time dependent decision-making; dynamic priorities in the AHP/ANP: generalizing from points to function and from real to complex variables. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 46, 860–891 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lin, Y.-H., Lee, P.-C., Ting, H.-I.: Dynamic multi-attribute decision making model with gray number evaluation. Expert Systems with Applications 35, 1638–1644 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Xu, Z.: On multi-period multi-attribute decision making. Knowledge-Based Systems 21, 164–171 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cerreta, M., De Toro, P.: Assessing urban transformations: a SDSS for the master plan of castel capuano, naples. In: Murgante, B., Gervasi, O., Misra, S., Nedjah, N., Rocha, A.M.A., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B.O. (eds.) ICCSA 2012, Part II. LNCS, vol. 7334, pp. 168–180. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cilona, T., Granata, M.F.: A choquet integral based assessment model of projects of urban neglected areas: a case of study. In: Murgante, B., Misra, S., Rocha, A.M.A., Torre, C., Rocha, J.G., Falcão, M.I., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B.O., Gervasi, O. (eds.) ICCSA 2014, Part III. LNCS, vol. 8581, pp. 90–105. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ferretti, V., Bottero, M., Mondini, G.: An integrated approach for exploring opportunities and vulnerabilities of complex territorial systems. In: Murgante, B., Misra, S., Rocha, A.M.A., Torre, C., Rocha, J.G., Falcão, M.I., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B.O., Gervasi, O. (eds.) ICCSA 2014, Part III. LNCS, vol. 8581, pp. 667–681. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Girard, L.F., Torre, C.M.: The use of ahp in a multiactor evaluation for urban development programs: a case study. In: Murgante, B., Gervasi, O., Misra, S., Nedjah, N., Rocha, A.M.A., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B.O. (eds.) ICCSA 2012, Part II. LNCS, vol. 7334, pp. 157–167. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Giove, S., Rosato, P., Breil, M.: An application of multicriteria decision making to built heritage. The redevelopment of Venice Arsenale. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 17, 85–99 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nesticò, A., De Mare, G.: Government tools for urban regeneration: the cities plan in italy. a critical analysis of the results and the proposed alternative. In: Murgante, B., Misra, S., Rocha, A.M.A., Torre, C., Rocha, J.G., Falcão, M.I., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B.O., Gervasi, O. (eds.) ICCSA 2014, Part II. LNCS, vol. 8580, pp. 547–562. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Morano, P., Tajani, F.: Break Even Analysis for the financial verification of urban regeneration projects. Applied Mechanics and Materials 439, 1830–1835 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sabri, S., Majid, M.R., Ludin, A.N.M.: Integrated modeling of multicriteria evaluation and planning support systems in inner city redevelopment appraisal. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Postgraduate Conference on Infrastructure and Environment. IPCIE 2010, vol. 2, pp. 16–24 (2010)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yu, P.L., Chen, Y.-C.: Dynamic MCDM, habitual domains and competence. In: Ehrgott, M., Figueira, J.R., Greco, S. (eds.) Trends in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis, pp. 1–35. Springer, USA (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Keeney, R.L., Raiffa, H.: Decisions with multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1976)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cilona, T.: Agrigento: la città e la costa - dal waterfront al piano spiaggia. Aa 22, pp. 75–79. Ordine degli architetti di Agrigento, Agrigento (2007)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cilona, T.: Il litorale agrigentino. Strumenti di pianificazione e gestione delle coste. Cepasa Editore, Agrigento (2008)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cilona, T.: Waterfront of Agrigento. Studies and researches of St Leone concerning its development. Cepasa Editore, Agrigento (2010)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Boccaloro, F.: Difesa delle coste e ingegneria naturalistica. Manuale di ripristino degli habitat lagunari, dunari, litoranei e marini. Palermo, Dario Flaccovio Editore (2012)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare - Direzione Generale per la Salvaguardia Ambientale. Assetto della tutela naturalistica. http://www.va.min-am-bien-te.it
  34. 34.
    Federazione Italiana Vela. http://www.federvela.it
  35. 35.
    Pietro, G.: Akragas-Agrigento. La storia, la topografia, i monumenti, gli scavi. Legambiente, Roma (1995)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Vincke, P., Brans, J.P.: A preference ranking organization method. The PROMETHEE method for MCDM. Management Science 31, 641–656 (1985)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Brans, J.P., Vincke, P., Mareschal, B.: How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method. European Journal of Operational Research 24, 228–238 (1986)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Vincke, P.: Multicriteria Decision-aid. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (1992)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Behzadian, M., Kazemzadeh, E.B., Albadvi, A., Aghdasi, M.: PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. European Journal of Operational Research 200, 198–215 (2010)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kuang, H., Kilgour, D.M., Hipel, K.W.: Grey-based PROMETHEE II with application to evaluation of source water protection strategies. Information Sciences 294, 376–389 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kourtit, K., Macharis, C., Nijkamp, P.: A multi-actor multi-criteria analysis of the performance of global cities. Applied Geography 49, 24–36 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Le Téno, J.F., Mareschal, B.: An interval version of PROMETHEE for the comparison of building products’ design with ill-defined data on environmental quality. European Journal of Operational Research 109, 522–529 (1998)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Juan, Y.-K., Roper, K.O., Castro-Lacouture, D., Kim, J.H.: Optimal decision making on urban renewal projects. Management Decision 48(2), 207–224 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Brans, J.P., Mareschal, B.: Promethee methods. In: Figeira, J., Greco, S., Ehrgott, M. (eds.) Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, pp. 163–195. Springer, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Von Winterfeldt, D., Edwards, W.: Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1986)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ArchitectureUniversity of PalermoPalermoItaly

Personalised recommendations