Abstract
Scientists usually avoid sampling non-vascular plants (particularly bryophytes and lichens) for a variety of reasons. However, non-vascular plants often respond differently to the environment than do vascular plants for a range of vegetation types. There is increasing evidence that including them in a sampling programme conveys additional information about the study sites. Such sampling can be important at all scales and in any vegetation type, depending on the subtlety of information sought. Situations which appear likely to benefit from sampling of non-vascular plants are those involving some or all of the following: (1) high-stress environments, (2) relatively long environmental gradients, (3) suspected occurrence of subtle niche-based differences, and (4) need for sensitivity to environmental changes at micro-spatial or temporal scales. Knowledge and use of non-vascular plants in vegetation science will become increasingly important as anthropogenic impacts such as climate change intensify.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Beever J, Allison KW, Child J (1992) The Mosses of New Zealand. University of Otago Press, Dunedin, New Zealand
Bradfield GE, Scagel A (1984) Correlations among vegetation strata and environmental variables in subalpine spruce-fir forests, southeastern British Columbia. Vegetatio 55:105–114
Bruun HH, Moen J, Virtanen R, Grytnes J-A, Oksanen L, Angerbjörn A (2006) Effects of altitude and topography on species richness of vascular plants, bryophytes and lichens in alpine communities. J Veg Sci 17:37–46
Cornelissen JHC, Gradstein SR (1990) On the occurrence of bryophytes and macrolichens in different lowland rain forest types at Mabura Hill, Guyana. Trop Bryol 3:29–35
Cronberg N, Molau U, Sonesson M (1997) Genetic variation in the clonal bryophyte Hylocomium splendens at hierarchical geographical scales in Scandinavia. Heredity 78:293–301
Ewald J (2009) Epigeic bryophytes do not improve bioindication by Ellenberg values in mountain forests. Basic Appl Ecol 10:420–426
Fife AJ, Glenny D, Beever JA, Braggins JE, Brownsey PJ, Renner MAM, Hitchmough R (2010) New Zealand’s threatened bryophytes: conservation efforts. Phytotaxa 9:275–278
Grau O, Grytnes JA, Birks HJB (2007) A comparison of altitudinal species richness patterns of bryophytes with other plant groups in Nepal, Central Himalaya. J Biogeogr 34:1907–1915
Hawksworth DL, Rose F (1970) Qualitative scale for estimating sulphur dioxide air pollution in England and Wales using epiphytic lichens. Nature 227:145–148
Herben T (1987) Bryophytes in grassland vegetation sample plots: what is their correlation with vascular plants? Folia Geobot Phytotaxon 22:35–41
Hodges TA, Rapson GL (2010) Is Empodisma minus the ecosystem engineer of the FBT (fen-bog transition zone) in New Zealand? J R Soc N Z 40:181–207
Hutsemekers V, Dopagne C, Vanderpoorten A (2008) How far and how fast do bryophytes travel at the landscape scale? Divers Distrib 14:483–492
Ingerpuu N, Kull K, Vellak K (1998) Bryophyte vegetation in a wooded meadow: relationships with phanerogam diversity and responses to fertilisation. Plant Ecol 134:163–171
Ingerpuu N, Liira J, Pärtel M (2005) Vascular plants facilitated bryophytes in a grassland experiment. Plant Ecol 180:69–75
Kantvilas G, Minchin PR (1989) An analysis of epiphytic lichen communities in Tasmanian cool temperate rainforest. Vegetatio 84:99–112
Knight A (2014) Lichens of New Zealand: an introductory illustrated guide. Botanical Society of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
Lee TD, La Roi GH (1979) Bryophyte and understory vascular plant beta-diversity in relation to moisture and elevation gradients. Vegetatio 40:29–38
Löbel S, Dengler J, Hobohm C (2006) Species richness of vascular plants, bryophytes and lichens in dry grasslands: the effects of environment, landscape structure and competition. Folia Geobotanica 41:377–393
Malcolm B, Malcolm N (2006) Mosses and other bryophytes: an illustrated glossary, 2nd edn. Micro-Optics Press, Nelson, New Zealand
McCune B, Antos JA (1981) Correlations between forest layers in the Swan Valley, Montana. Ecology 62:1196–1204
McCune B, Lesica P (1992) The trade-off between species capture and quantitative accuracy in ecological inventory of lichens and bryophytes in forests in Montana. The Bryologist 95:296–304
Medina NG, Albertos B, Lara F, Mazimpaka V, Garilleti R, Draper D, Hortal J (2013) Species richness of epiphytic bryophytes: drivers across scales on the edge of the Mediterranean. Ecography 36:1–14
Mills SE, MacDonald SE (2005) Factors influencing bryophyte assemblage at different scales in the western Canadian boreal forest. Bryologist 108:86–100
Molau U, Alatalo JM (1998) Responses of subarctic-alpine plant communities to simulated environmental change: biodiversity of bryophytes, lichens and vascular plants. Ambio 27:322–329
Murphy AL, Silberbauer RB, Streeter RE, Smiley DR, Smith AR, Darling S, van Essen PR, Rapson GL (2012) An unusual climbing dune, Big Hellfire Pass, Stewart Island, New Zealand: exploration through environment, vegetation and trait patterns. N Z J Bot 50:233–256
Nekola JC, White PS (1999) The distance decay of similarity in biogeography and ecology. J Biogeog 26:867–878
Ódor P, Standovár T (2001) Richness of bryophyte vegetation in near-natural and managed beech stands: the effects of management-induced differences in dead wood. Ecol Bull 49:219–229
Pausas JG (1994) Species richness patterns in the understorey of Pyrenean Pinus sylvestris forest. J Veg Sci 5:517–524
Pharo EJ, Beattie AJ, Binns D (1999) Vascular plant diversity as a surrogate for bryophyte and lichen diversity. Conserv Biol 13:282–292
Pharo EJ, Beattie AJ, Pressey RL (2000) Effectiveness of using vascular plants to select reserves for bryophytes and lichens. Biol Conserv 96:71–378
Sekulová L, Hájek M, Hájková P, Mikulášková E, Buttler A, Syronvátka V, Rozbrojová Z (2012) Patterns of bryophyte and vascular plant richness in European subalpine springs. Plant Ecol 213:237–249
Spitale D, Petraglia A, Tomaselli M (2009) Structural equation modelling detects unexpected differences between bryophyte and vascular plant species richness along multiple environmental gradients. J Biogeogr 36:745–755
Steel JB, Wilson JB, Anderson BJ, Lodge RHE, Tangney RS (2004) Are bryophyte communities different from higher-plant communities? Abundance relations. Oikos 104:479–486
Sun S-Q, Wu Y-H, Wang G-X, Zhou J, Yu D, Bing H-J, Luo J (2013) Bryophyte species richness and composition along an altitudinal gradient in Gongga Mountain, China. PLoS One 8(3), e581231, 10pp
Turtureanu PD, Palpurina S, Becker T, Dolnik C, Ruprecht E, Sutcliffe LM, Szabó A, Dengler J (2014) Scale-and taxon-dependent biodiversity patterns of dry grassland vegetation in Transylvania. Agric Ecosyst Environ 182:15–24
Virtanen R, Crawley MJ (2010) Contrasting patterns in bryophyte and vascular plant species richness in relation to elevation, biomass and Soay sheep on St Kilda, Scotland. Plant Ecol Divers 3:77–85
Werth S, Tømmervik H, Elvebakk A (2005) Epiphytic macrolichen communities along regional gradients in northern Norway. J Veg Sci 16:199–208
Wilson JB, Meurk CD (2011) The control of community composition by distance, environment and history: a regional-scale study of the mountain grasslands of southern New Zealand. J Biogeog 38:2384–2396
Zamfir M, Dai X, van der Maarel E (1999) Bryophytes, lichens and phanerogams in an alvar grassland: relationships at different scales and contributions to plant community pattern. Ecography 22:40–52
Zartman CE (2003) Habitat fragmentation impacts on epiphyllous bryophyte communities in central Amazonia. Ecology 84:948–954
Acknowledgements
Thanks to Elgene Box for his exemplary patience with recalcitrant authors, to Jessica Beever, Patrick Brownsey, Allison Knight, Rodney Lewington and all others who encourage my dillettantish study of non-vascular plants and assist cheerfully with identifications.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Additional information
Dedicated to Kazue Fujiwara, a modern representative of that increasingly diminutive taxon, the scholar and gentlewoman.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rapson, G.L. (2016). At What Scales and in What Vegetation Types Should We Sample Non-vascular Plants?. In: Box, E. (eds) Vegetation Structure and Function at Multiple Spatial, Temporal and Conceptual Scales. Geobotany Studies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21452-8_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21452-8_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21451-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-21452-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)