Skip to main content

Large Habitat Range But Low Floristic Variation: The Case of Festuco rubrae-Agrostietum capillaris Grasslands

  • Chapter
Vegetation Structure and Function at Multiple Spatial, Temporal and Conceptual Scales

Part of the book series: Geobotany Studies ((GEOBOT))

  • 1347 Accesses

Abstract

We attempted to classify 414 grassland stands dominated by Festuca rubra and Agrostis capillaris in the southeastern Carpathian region and to infer the main ecological factors underlying the observed floristic variation. Several internal criteria were employed to select the optimal number of clusters resulting from applying the fuzzy C-medians algorithm to the Bray-Curtis distance matrix. Species fidelity, non-metric multidimensional scaling and relative importance of four plant functional groups were subsequently used to validate floristically and ecologically the clusters of relevés distinguished.

Sixty-five relevés were excluded from the final classification as being boundary or outlying communities with respect to cluster medoids. The remaining 349 relevés were assigned to five facies: potentillosum aureae (PA), loliosum perennis (LP), violosum caninae (VC), typicum (T ) and succisosum pratensis (SP). The strongest gradient detected runs from acidophilous grasslands (PA and LP) to those formed on base-rich substrates (VC and SP). A much weaker eco-floristic differentiation is induced by elevation and the predominant management type, i.e. colline-submontane meadows (LP and SP) versus montane-subalpine pastures (PA and VC). Unlike mega-forbs, the proportion of tall herbs, graminoids and legumes differs significantly between certain facies but also tends to discriminate between mown and grazed grasslands.

The facies distinguished herein are fuzzier and differ more or less from the five subassociations recently acknowledged in the literature through an empirical phytosociological classification. Although we did not consider relevés in which third-party species were dominant, our data set contained some noise due to inconsistencies in the occurrence patterns of grazing-tolerant and ruderal species. The fuzzy clustering output is less useful as a typological reference but provides a good basis for unravelling successional pathways under different environmental conditions and grassland use modes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Apostolova I, Meshinev T (2006) Classification of seminatural grasslands in Northeastern Bulgaria. Annali di Botanica 6:29–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Bărbos MI (2006) Montane grasslands dominated by Agrostis capillaris and Festuca rubra in Maramureş county. I. Phytosociological analysis. Contrib Bot 41:41–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Baur B, Cremene C, Groza G, Rakosy L, Schileyko AA, Baur A, Stoll P, Erhardt A (2006) Effects of abandonment of subalpine hay meadows on plant and invertebrate diversity in Transylvania, Romania. Biol Conserv 132:261–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borhidi A, Sánta A (1999) Vörös könyv Magyarország növénytársulásairól 1-2. A KöM Természetvédelmi Hivatalának Tanulmánykötetei 6. Természet Búvár Alapítvány Kiadó, Budapest

    Google Scholar 

  • Chifu T, Mânzu C, Zamfirescu O (2006) Flora şi vegetaţia Moldovei (România), part II. Vegetaţia. Ed. Univ. Al.I. Cuza, Iaşi

    Google Scholar 

  • Chytrý M, Tichý L (2003) Diagnostic, constant and dominant species of vegetation classes and alliances of the Czech Republic: a statistical revision. Folia Facultatis Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Masarykianae Brunensis 108:1–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Chytrý M, Tichý L, Holt J, Botta-Dukat Z (2002) Determination of diagnostic species with statistical fidelity measures. J Veg Sci 13:79–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coldea G (1991) Prodrome des associations végétales des Carpates du sud-est (Carpates roumaines). Documents Phytosociologiques 13:317–539

    Google Scholar 

  • Coldea G (2012) Classe Molinio-Arrhenatheretea. In: Coldea G (ed) Les associations végétales de Roumanie 2. Les associations anthropogènes. Ed. Presa Universitară Clujană, Cluj-Napoca, pp 191–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Coldea G, Filipaş L, Fărcaş S, Stoica A, Ursu T, Pop A-M (2008) The relationship between the structure of grasslands from the north eastern slope of the Vlădeasa Massif and socio-economic activities. Contrib Bot 43:53–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Csűrös Ş, Resmeriţă I (1960) Studii asupra pajiştilor de Festuca rubra L. din Transilvania. Contrib Bot 2:149–173

    Google Scholar 

  • De Cáceres Ainsa M (2012) GINKGO user’s manual (version 1.4). Dept. Biologia Vegetal, Universitat de Barcelona. http://biodiver.bio.ub.es/ginkgo/

  • Doniţă N, Paucă-Comănescu M, Popescu A, Mihăilescu S, Biriş I-A (2005) Habitatele din România. Tehnică Silvică, Bucureşti

    Google Scholar 

  • Drăgulescu C (1984) Flora şi vegetaţia din bazinul văii Sadului (jud. Cluj). Studiu ecologic, corologic, fitocenologic şi economic. Doctoral thesis, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufrêne M, Legendre P (1997) Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol Monogr 67:345–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn JC (1976) Indices of partition fuzziness and the detection of clusters in large data sets. In: Gupta MM (ed) Fuzzy automata and decision process. Elsevier, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberg H (1996) Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen in ökologischer, dynamischer und historischer Sicht. Ulmer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitter AH, Peat HJ (1994) The ecological flora database. J Ecol 82:415–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer M, Wipf S (2002) Effect of low-intensity grazing on the vegetation of traditionally mown subalpine meadows. Biol Conserv 104:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horvát I, Glavač V, Ellenberg H (1974) Vegetation Südosteuropas. Gustav-Fischer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Jovanović-Dunjć R, Jovanović S (1989) Review of plant communities of meadows, pastures and mountain peat bogs in the National Park of Tara (Serbia). Glasn Inst Bot Bašte Univ Beograd 23:69–75 (in Serbian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurko A (1969) Übersicht über die Pflanzengesellschaften des Cynosurion-Verbandes in den Karpaten. Vegetatio 18:222–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleijn D, Kohler F, Báldi A, Batáry P, Concepción ED, Clough Y, Díaz M, Gabriel D, Holzschuh A, Knop E, Kovács A, Marshall EJP, Tscharntke T, Verhulst J (2009) On the relationship between farmland biodiversity and land-use intensity in Europe. Proc R Soc B 276:903–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleyer M, Bekker RM, Knevel IC, Bakker JP, Thompson K, Sonnenschein M, Poschlod P, Van Groenendael JM, Klimes L, Klimesová J, Klotz S, Rusch GM, Hermy M, Adriaens D, Boedeltje G, Bossuyt B, Dannemann A, Endels P, Götzenberger L, Hodgson JG, Jackel A-K, Kühn I, Kunzmann D, Ozinga WA, Römermann C, Stadler M, Schlegelmilch J, Steendam HJ, Tackenberg O, Wilmann B, Cornelissen JHC, Eriksson O, Garnier E, Peco B (2008) The LEDA traitbase: a database of life-history traits of Northwest European flora. J Ecol 96:1266–1274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kojić M, Popović R, Karadžić B (1998) Syntaxonomic review of vegetation in Serbia. Inst. Biol. Istraž. “S. Stanković” Press, Beograd (in Serbian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology, vol 20, Developments in environmental modelling. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer K, Weyand A, Fischer M, Stöcklin J (2006) Old cultural traditions, in addition to land use and topography, are shaping plant diversity of grasslands in the Alps. Biol Conserv 130:438–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mucina L (1997) Classification of vegetation: past, present and future. J Veg Sci 8:751–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oroian S (1998) Flora şi vegetaţia defileului Mureşului între Topliţa şi Deda. Casa de editură Mureş, Târgu-Mureş

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn CE (2006) Statistical applications for health information management. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Sudbury

    Google Scholar 

  • Peia P (1978) Flora vasculară a Depresiunii Almăjului (jud. Caraş-Severin). Studiu taxonomic, geobotanic şi economic. Doctoral thesis, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca

    Google Scholar 

  • Petković B (1985) Die Bergwiesen und Weiden in Tutin’s Gebiet. Glasn Inst Bot Bašte Univ Beograd 19:175–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Pop I (1976) Contribuţii la cunoaşterea vegetaţiei munceilor din împrejurimile Abrudului (Jud. Alba). Contrib Bot 16:123–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Puşcaru D, Puşcaru-Soroceanu E, Paucă A, Şerbănescu I, Beldie A, Ştefureac T, Cernescu N, Saghin F, Creţu V, Lupan L, Taşcenco V (1956) Păşunile alpine din Munţii Bucegi. Editura Acad R.P.R., Bucureşti

    Google Scholar 

  • Puşcaru-Soroceanu E (coord) (1963) Păşunile şi fâneţele din Pepublica Populară Română. Studiu geobotanic şi agroproductiv. Editura Acad. R.P.R., Bucureşti

    Google Scholar 

  • Redžić S (2007) Syntaxonomic diversity as an indicator of ecological diversity—case study Vranica Mts. in the Central Bosnia. Biologia 62:173–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseuw PJ (1987) Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. J Comput Appl Math 20:53–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (2008) SAS/STAT 9.2 User’s guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanda V (2002) Vademecum ceno-structural privind covorul vegetal din România. Ed. Vergiliu, Bucureşti

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanda V, Popescu A, Doltu MI (1980) Cenotaxonomia şi corologia grupărilor vegetale din România. Studii şi Comunicări—Ştiinţe Naturale (Muzeul Brukenthal) 24(suppl):1–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Šegulja N (2005) Vegetation of grassland, moor and swamp habitats in the National Park Plitvice Lakes. Nat Croat 14:1–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Trinajstić I (2008) Plant communities of Croatia. Acad. Sci. Forest, Zagreb

    Google Scholar 

  • Velev N, Apostolova I, Fajmonová Z (2010) Cynosurus cristatus grasslands in West Bulgaria. Phytologia Balcanica 17:221–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilmanns O (1998) Ökologische Pflanzensoziologie. Quelle & Meyer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanoschi V (1971) Flora şi vegetaţia Masivului Ceahlău. Doctoral thesis. Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dan Gafta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gafta, D., Muncaciu, S. (2016). Large Habitat Range But Low Floristic Variation: The Case of Festuco rubrae-Agrostietum capillaris Grasslands. In: Box, E. (eds) Vegetation Structure and Function at Multiple Spatial, Temporal and Conceptual Scales. Geobotany Studies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21452-8_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics