Skip to main content

MR of Obstetric Diseases in Pregnancy

  • Chapter

Abstract

Pregnancy predisposes women to a range of obstetric complications, which are often multifaceted and perplexing. Imaging plays a decisive role in the diagnosis and management of these complications. Ultrasonography (USG) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confer the least risk to the fetus and should be the favored examinations for evaluating these complications. MRI does not expose mother and fetus to ionizing radiation and provides cross-sectional images in any plane with high anatomic resolution even without intravenous contrast administration. Knowledge of appositeness of imaging is necessary for precise patient management. This chapter provides comprehensive update of spectrum of non-fetal obstetric diseases affecting pregnant patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Berg CJ, Chang J, Callaghan WM, Whitehead SJ (2003) Pregnancy-related mortality in the United States, 1991–1997. Obstet Gynecol 101(2):289–296, PubMed Epub 2003/02/11.eng

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rigo J Jr, Csakany G, Laky M, Nagy B, Horvath E, Joo JG (2014) Trends in maternal mortality in Hungary between 1978 and 2010. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 173:29–33, PubMed Epub 2013/11/28.eng

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shanbhogue AK, Menias CO, Lalwani N, Lall C, Khandelwal A, Nagar A (2013) Obstetric (nonfetal) complications. Radiol Clin North Am 51(6):983–1004, PubMed Epub 2013/11/12.eng

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Leyendecker JR, Gorengaut V, Brown JJ (2004) MR imaging of maternal diseases of the abdomen and pelvis during pregnancy and the immediate postpartum period. Radiographics Rev Publ Radiol Soc N Am Inc 24(5):1301–1316, PubMed Epub 2004/09/17.eng

    Google Scholar 

  5. De Wilde JP, Rivers AW, Price DL (2005) A review of the current use of magnetic resonance imaging in pregnancy and safety implications for the fetus. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 87(2–3):335–353, PubMed Epub 2004/11/24.eng

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gowland PA, De Wilde J (2008) Temperature increase in the fetus due to radio frequency exposure during magnetic resonance scanning. Phys Med Biol 53(21):L15–L18, PubMed Epub 2008/10/10.eng

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kanal E, Barkovich AJ, Bell C, Borgstede JP, Bradley WG Jr, Froelich JW et al (2013) ACR guidance document on MR safe practices: 2013. J Magn Reson Imaging 37(3):501–530, PubMed PMID: 23345200. Epub 2013/01/25.eng

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Strizek B, Jani JC, Mucyo E, De Keyzer F, Pauwels I, Ziane S et al (2015) Safety of MR imaging at 1.5 T in fetuses: a retrospective case-control study of birth weights and the effects of acoustic noise. Radiology 275(2):530–537, PubMed PMID: 25575119. Epub 2015/01/13.eng

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Patenaude Y, Pugash D, Lim K, Morin L, Lim K, Bly S et al (2014) The use of magnetic resonance imaging in the obstetric patient. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 36(4):349–363, PubMed PMID: 24798674. Epub 2014/05/07.engfre

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Khandelwal A, Fasih N, Kielar A (2013) Imaging of acute abdomen in pregnancy. Radiol Clin North Am 51(6):1005–1022, PubMed PMID: 24210441. Epub 2013/11/12.eng

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen MM, Coakley FV, Kaimal A, Laros RK Jr (2008) Guidelines for computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging use during pregnancy and lactation. Obstet Gynecol 112(2 Pt 1):333–340, PMID: 18669732. Epub 2008/08/02.eng

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Garcia-Bournissen F, Shrim A, Koren G (2006) Safety of gadolinium during pregnancy. Can Fam Physician 52:309–310, PubMed Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC1479713. Epub 2006/04/01.eng

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kubik-Huch RA, Gottstein-Aalame NM, Frenzel T, Seifert B, Puchert E, Wittek S et al (2000) Gadopentetate dimeglumine excretion into human breast milk during lactation. Radiology 216(2):555–558, PubMed PMID: 10924585. Epub 2000/08/05.eng

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rofsky NM, Weinreb JC, Litt AW (1993) Quantitative analysis of gadopentetate dimeglumine excreted in breast milk. J Magn Reson Imaging 3(1):131–132, PubMed PMID: 8428080. Epub 1993/01/01.eng

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tikkanen M (2011) Placental abruption: epidemiology, risk factors and consequences. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 90(2):140–149, PubMed PMID: 21241259. Epub 2011/01/19.eng

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ananth CV, Berkowitz GS, Savitz DA, Lapinski RH (1999) Placental abruption and adverse perinatal outcomes. JAMA 282(17):1646–1651, PubMed PMID: 10553791. Epub 1999/11/30.eng

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Oyelese Y, Ananth CV (2006) Placental abruption. Obstet Gynecol 108(4):1005–1016, PubMed PMID: 17012465. Epub 2006/10/03.eng

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rasmussen S, Irgens LM, Bergsjo P, Dalaker K (1996) The occurrence of placental abruption in Norway 1967–1991. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 75(3):222–228, PubMed PMID: 2360584. Epub 1990/06/01.eng

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pearlman MD, Tintinallli JE, Lorenz RP (1990) A prospective controlled study of outcome after trauma during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 162(6):1502–1507; discussion 7–10. PubMed PMID: 2360584. Epub 1990/06/01.eng

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Raptis CA, Mellnick VM, Raptis DA, Kitchin D, Fowler KJ, Lubner M et al (2014) Imaging of trauma in the pregnant patient. Radiographics Rev Publ Radiol Soc N Am Inc 34(3):748–763, PubMed PMID: 24819793. Epub 2014/05/14.eng

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nyberg DA, Cyr DR, Mack LA, Wilson DA, Shuman WP (1987) Sonographic spectrum of placental abruption. AJR Am J Roentgenol 148(1):161–164, PubMed PMID: 3538831. Epub 1987/01/01.eng

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Masselli G, Brunelli R, Di Tola M, Anceschi M, Gualdi G (2011) MR imaging in the evaluation of placental abruption: correlation with sonographic findings. Radiology 259(1):222–230, PubMed PMID: 21330568. Epub 2011/02/19.eng

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Glantz C, Purnell L (2002) Clinical utility of sonography in the diagnosis and treatment of placental abruption. J Ultrasound Med Official J Am I Ultrasound Med 21(8):837–840, PubMed PMID: 12164566. Epub 2002/08/08.eng

    Google Scholar 

  24. Allen BC, Leyendecker JR (2013) Placental evaluation with magnetic resonance. Radiol Clin North Am 51(6):955–966, PubMed PMID: 24210438. Epub 2013/11/12.eng

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Harper LM, Odibo AO, Macones GA, Crane JP, Cahill AG (2010) Effect of placenta previa on fetal growth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203(4):330.e1–330.e5, PubMed Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC3128804. Epub 2010/07/06.eng

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Oyelese Y, Smulian JC (2006) Placenta previa, placenta accreta, and vasa previa. Obstet Gynecol 107(4):927–941, PubMed PMID: 16582134. Epub 2006/04/04.eng

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wu S, Kocherginsky M, Hibbard JU (2005) Abnormal placentation: twenty-year analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192(5):1458–1461, PubMed PMID: 15902137. Epub 2005/05/20.eng

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Miller DA, Chollet JA, Goodwin TM (1997) Clinical risk factors for placenta previa-placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 177(1):210–214, PubMed PMID: 9240608. Epub 1997/07/01.eng

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Clark SL, Koonings PP, Phelan JP (1985) Placenta previa/accreta and prior cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol 66(1):89–92, PubMed PMID: 4011075. Epub 1985/07/01.eng

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Warshak CR, Eskander R, Hull AD, Scioscia AL, Mattrey RF, Benirschke K et al (2006) Accuracy of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of placenta accreta. Obstet Gynecol 108(3 Pt 1):573–581, PubMed PMID: 16946217. Epub 2006/09/02.eng

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Dwyer BK, Belogolovkin V, Tran L, Rao A, Carroll I, Barth R et al (2008) Prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta: sonography or magnetic resonance imaging? J Ultrasound Med Off J Am I Ultrasound Med 27(9):1275–1281, PubMed Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC2743470. Epub 2008/08/22.eng

    Google Scholar 

  32. Meng X, Xie L, Song W (2013) Comparing the diagnostic value of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for placenta accreta: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Med Biol 39(11):1958–1965, PubMed PMID: 23972487. Epub 2013/08/27.eng

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Alamo L, Anaye A, Rey J, Denys A, Bongartz G, Terraz S et al (2013) Detection of suspected placental invasion by MRI: do the results depend on observer’ experience? Eur J Radiol 82(2):e51–e57, PMID: 23020968. Epub 2012/10/02.eng

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Leyendecker JR, DuBose M, Hosseinzadeh K, Stone R, Gianini J, Childs DD et al (2012) MRI of pregnancy-related issues: abnormal placentation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198(2):311–320, PubMed PMID: 22268173. Epub 2012/01/24.eng

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sebire NJ, Foskett M, Fisher RA, Rees H, Seckl M, Newlands E (2002) Risk of partial and complete hydatidiform molar pregnancy in relation to maternal age. BJOG 109(1):99–102, PubMed PMID: 11843379. Epub 2002/02/15.eng

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Semer DA, Macfee MS (1995) Gestational trophoblastic disease: epidemiology. Semin Oncol 22(2):109–112, PubMed PMID: 7740310. Epub 1995/04/01.eng

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Soper JT, Mutch DG, Schink JC (2004) Diagnosis and treatment of gestational trophoblastic disease: ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 53. Gynecol Oncol 93(3):575–585, PubMed PMID: 15196847. Epub 2004/06/16.eng

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Palmer JR (1994) Advances in the epidemiology of gestational trophoblastic disease. J Reprod Med 39(3):155–162, PMID: 8035370. Epub 1994/03/01.eng

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Buckley JD, Henderson BE, Morrow CP, Hammond CB, Kohorn EI, Austin DF (1988) Case-control study of gestational choriocarcinoma. Cancer Res 48(4):1004–1010, PubMed PMID: 3338071. Epub 1988/02/15.eng

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lazarus E, Hulka C, Siewert B, Levine D (1999) Sonographic appearance of early complete molar pregnancies. J Ultrasound Med Off J Am I Ultrasound Med 18(9):589–594; quiz 95–96. PubMed PMID: 10478967. Epub 1999/09/09.eng

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Fatima M, Kasi PM, Baloch SN, Kassi M, Marri SM, Kassi M (2011) Incidence, management, and outcome of molar pregnancies at a tertiary care hospital in Quetta, Pakistan. ISRN Obstet Gynecol 2011:925316, PubMed Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC3195536. Epub 2011/10/27.eng

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Shanbhogue AK, Lalwani N, Menias CO (2013) Gestational trophoblastic disease. Radiol Clin North Am 51(6):1023–1034, PubMed PMID: 24210442. Epub 2013/11/12.eng

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Fowler DJ, Lindsay I, Seckl MJ, Sebire NJ (2006) Routine pre-evacuation ultrasound diagnosis of hydatidiform mole: experience of more than 1000 cases from a regional referral center. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Off J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 27(1):56–60, PubMed Epub 2005/11/08.eng

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Kirk E, Papageorghiou AT, Condous G, Bottomley C, Bourne T (2007) The accuracy of first trimester ultrasound in the diagnosis of hydatidiform mole. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Off J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 29(1):70–75, PubMed Epub 2007/01/04.eng

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Barton JW, McCarthy SM, Kohorn EI, Scoutt LM, Lange RC (1993) Pelvic MR imaging findings in gestational trophoblastic disease, incomplete abortion, and ectopic pregnancy: are they specific? Radiology 186(1):163–168, PubMed PMID: 7677973. Epub 1993/01/01.eng

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Allen SD, Lim AK, Seckl MJ, Blunt DM, Mitchell AW (2006) Radiology of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. Clin Radiol 61(4):301–313, PubMed PMID: 16546459. Epub 2006/03/21.eng

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Kumar J, Ilancheran A, Ratnam SS (1988) Pulmonary metastases in gestational trophoblastic disease: a review of 97 cases. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 95(1):70–74, PubMed PMID: 2829961. Epub 1988/01/01.eng

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Berkowitz RS, Goldstein DP (1981) Pathogenesis of gestational trophoblastic neoplasms. Pathobiol Annu 11:391–411, PubMed PMID: 6276846. Epub 1981/01/01.eng

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Neuhaus W, Bauerschmitz G, Gohring U, Schmidt T, Bolte A (2001) [Risk of uterine rupture after cesarean section--analysis of 1,086 births]. Zentralbl Gynakol 123(3):148–152, PubMed Epub 2001/05/09. Das Risiko der Uterusruptur nach vorausgegangenem Kaiserschnitt--eine Analyse von 1,086 Geburten.ger

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Miller DA, Goodwin TM, Gherman RB, Paul RH (1997) Intrapartum rupture of the unscarred uterus. Obstet Gynecol 89(5 Pt 1):671–673, PubMed PMID: 9166298. Epub 1997/05/01.eng

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Di Salvo DN (2003) Sonographic imaging of maternal complications of pregnancy. J Ultrasound Med Off J Am I Ultrasound Med 22(1):69–89, PubMed PMID: 12523613. Epub 2003/01/14.eng

    Google Scholar 

  52. Maldjian C, Milestone B, Schnall M, Smith R (1998) MR appearance of uterine dehiscence in the post-cesarean section patient. J Comput Assist Tomogr 22(5):738–741, PubMed PMID: 9754109. Epub 1998/10/01.eng

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Laifer-Narin SL, Kwak E, Kim H, Hecht EM, Newhouse JH (2014) Multimodality imaging of the postpartum or posttermination uterus: evaluation using ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 43(6):374–385, PubMed PMID: 25041975. Epub 2014/07/22.eng

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Laughlin SK, Baird DD, Savitz DA, Herring AH, Hartmann KE (2009) Prevalence of uterine leiomyomas in the first trimester of pregnancy: an ultrasound-screening study. Obstet Gynecol 113(3):630–635, PubMed Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC3384531. Epub 2009/03/21.eng

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Rosati P, Exacoustos C, Mancuso S (1992) Longitudinal evaluation of uterine myoma growth during pregnancy. A sonographic study. J Ultrasound Med Off J Am Inst Ultrasound Med 11(10):511–515, PubMed PMID: 1404579. Epub 1992/10/01.eng

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Durfee SM, Frates MC, Luong A, Benson CB (2005) The sonographic and color Doppler features of retained products of conception. J Ultrasound Med Off J Am Inst Ultrasound Med 24(9):1181–1186; quiz 8–9. PubMed PMID: 16123177. Epub 2005/08/27.eng

    Google Scholar 

  57. Sellmyer MA, Desser TS, Maturen KE, Jeffrey RB Jr, Kamaya A (2013) Physiologic, histologic, and imaging features of retained products of conception. Radiographics Rev Publ Radio Soc N Am Inc 33(3):781–796, PubMed PMID: 23674774. Epub 2013/05/16.eng

    Google Scholar 

  58. Noonan JB, Coakley FV, Qayyum A, Yeh BM, Wu L, Chen LM (2003) MR imaging of retained products of conception. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181(2):435–439, PubMed PMID: 12876023. Epub 2003/07/24.eng

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Dinsmoor MJ, Newton ER, Gibbs RS (1991) A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of oral antibiotic therapy following intravenous antibiotic therapy for postpartum endometritis. Obstet Gynecol 77(1):60–62, PubMed PMID: 1984229. Epub 1991/01/01.eng

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Lee NK, Kim S, Lee JW, Sol YL, Kim CW, Hyun Sung K et al (2010) Postpartum hemorrhage: clinical and radiologic aspects. Eur J Radiol 74(1):50–59, PubMed PMID: 19477095. Epub 2009/05/30.eng

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Sierra A, Burrel M, Sebastia C, Radosevic A, Barrufet M, Albela S et al (2012) Utility of multidetector CT in severe postpartum hemorrhage. Radiographics Rev Publ Radio Soc N Am Inc 32(5):1463–1481, PubMed PMID: 22977030. Epub 2012/09/15.eng

    Google Scholar 

  62. Creanga AA, Shapiro-Mendoza CK, Bish CL, Zane S, Berg CJ, Callaghan WM (2011) Trends in ectopic pregnancy mortality in the United States: 1980–2007. Obstet Gynecol 117(4):837–843, PubMed PMID: 21422853. Epub 2011/03/23.eng

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Levine D (2007) Ectopic pregnancy. Radiology 245(2):385–397, PubMed PMID: 17940301. Epub 2007/10/18.eng

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Barnhart KT (2009) Clinical practice. Ectopic pregnancy. N Engl J Med 361(4):379–387, PubMed PMID: 19625718. Epub 2009/07/25.eng

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Kao LY, Scheinfeld MH, Chernyak V, Rozenblit AM, Oh S, Dym RJ (2014) Beyond ultrasound: CT and MRI of ectopic pregnancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 202(4):904–911, PubMed PMID: 24660723. Epub 2014/03/26.eng

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Kataoka ML, Togashi K, Kobayashi H, Inoue T, Fujii S, Konishi J (1999) Evaluation of ectopic pregnancy by magnetic resonance imaging. Hum Reprod (Oxford, England) 14(10):2644–2650, PubMed Epub 1999/10/21.eng

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Atri M, Leduc C, Gillett P, Bret PM, Reinhold C, Kintzen G et al (1996) Role of endovaginal sonography in the diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancy. Radiographics Rev Publ Radio Soc N Am Inc 16(4):755–774; discussion 75. PubMed PMID: 8835969. Epub 1996/07/01.eng

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Parker RA 3rd, Yano M, Tai AW, Friedman M, Narra VR, Menias CO (2012) MR imaging findings of ectopic pregnancy: a pictorial review. Radiographics Rev Publ Radio Soc N Am Inc 32(5):1445–1460, PubMed PMID: 22977029. Epub 2012/09/15.eng

    Google Scholar 

  69. Filhastre M, Dechaud H, Lesnik A, Taourel P (2005) Interstitial pregnancy: role of MRI. Eur Radiol 15(1):93–95, PubMed PMID: 15647954. Epub 2005/01/14.eng

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Jung SE, Byun JY, Lee JM, Choi BG, Hahn ST (2001) Characteristic MR findings of cervical pregnancy. J Magn Reson Imaging 13(6):918–922, PubMed PMID: 11382953. Epub 2001/05/31.eng

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Lockhat F, Corr P, Ramphal S, Moodley J (2006) The value of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and management of extra-uterine abdominal pregnancy. Clin Radiol 61(3):264–269, PubMed Epub 2006/02/21.eng

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Huang Q, Zhang M, Zhai RY (2014) The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to diagnose cesarean scar pregnancies. Int J Gynaecol Obstet Off Organ Int Fed Gyn Obstet 127(2):144–146, PubMed PMID: 25035091. Epub 2014/07/19.eng

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Eom JM, Choi JS, Ko JH, Lee JH, Park SH, Hong JH et al (2013) Surgical and obstetric outcomes of laparoscopic management for women with heterotopic pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 39(12):1580–1586, PubMed PMID: 23875926. Epub 2013/07/24.eng

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Perkins KM, Boulet SL, Kissin DM, Jamieson DJ (2015) Risk of ectopic pregnancy associated with assisted reproductive technology in the United States, 2001–2011. Obstet Gynecol 125(1):70–78, PubMed PMID: 25560107. Epub 2015/01/07.eng

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Schmeler KM, Mayo-Smith WW, Peipert JF, Weitzen S, Manuel MD, Gordinier ME (2005) Adnexal masses in pregnancy: surgery compared with observation. Obstet Gynecol 105(5 Pt 1):1098–1103, PubMed PMID: 15863550. Epub 2005/05/03.eng

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Spalluto LB, Woodfield CA, DeBenedectis CM, Lazarus E (2012) MR imaging evaluation of abdominal pain during pregnancy: appendicitis and other nonobstetric causes. Radiographics Rev Pub Radio Soc N Am Inc 32(2):317–334, PubMed PMID: 22411935. Epub 2012/03/14.eng

    Google Scholar 

  77. Menias CO, Elsayes KM, Peterson CM, Huete A, Gratz BI, Bhalla S (2007) CT of pregnancy-related complications. Emerg Radiol 13(6):299–306, PubMed PMID: 17216173. Epub 2007/01/12.eng

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Virmani V, Kaza R, Sadaf A, Fasih N, Fraser-Hill M (2012) Ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging of ovarian vein thrombosis in obstetrical and nonobstetrical patients. Can Assoc Radiol J 63(2):109–118, PubMed PMID: 20870377. Epub 2010/09/28.eng

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashish Khandelwal MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Khandelwal, A., Shanbhogue, A. (2016). MR of Obstetric Diseases in Pregnancy. In: Masselli, G. (eds) MRI of Fetal and Maternal Diseases in Pregnancy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21428-3_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21428-3_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21427-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-21428-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics