Skip to main content

The Medical Practice Impact of Functional Neuroimaging Studies in Patients with Disorders of Consciousness

  • Chapter
Brain Function and Responsiveness in Disorders of Consciousness

Abstract

Functional neuroimaging studies of patients with disorders of consciousness have shown a small number of patients clinically diagnosed as in a vegetative state who, by fMRI or FDG-PET activation patterns, retain ideational capacity to follow commands showing they are aware. This finding impacts medical practice in several ways. The diagnostic criteria for disorders of consciousness must evolve from purely clinical to clinical plus functional neuroimaging. Prognosis is affected because the subgroup who retain this capacity comprise those with a higher likelihood for spontaneous clinical improvement. A few patients can be taught communication systems using fMRI responses, improving patient-centered care by allowing their participation in their own medical treatment decisions involving neurorehabilitation, stimulation, and palliation. A few medicolegal practice issues also are impacted by fMRI studies. But before functional neuroimaging studies can be fully incorporated into medical practice in these patients, they must be better understood, validated, and standardized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Fernandez-Espejo D, Owen AM (2013) Detecting awareness after severe brain injury. Nat Rev Neurosci 14:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Giacino JT, Fins JJ, Laureys S, Schiff ND (2014) Disorders of consciousness after acquired brain injury: the state of the science. Nat Rev Neurol 10:99–114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gosseries O, Di H, Laureys S, Boly M (2014) Measuring consciousness in severely damaged brains. Annu Rev Neurosci 37:457–478

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fins JJ, Illes J, Bernat JL, Hirsch J, Laureys S, Murphy E (2008) Neuroimaging and disorders of consciousness: envisioning an ethical research agenda. Am J Bioeth 8(9):3–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fins JJ (2003) Constructing an ethical stereotaxy for severe brain injury: balancing risks, benefits and access. Nat Rev Neurosci 4:323–327

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Illes J, Lau PW, Giacino JT (2008) Neuroimaging, impaired states of consciousness, and public outreach. Nat Clin Pract Neurol 4:542–543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Graham M, Weijer C, Peterson A et al (2015) Acknowledging awareness: informing families of individual research results for patients in the vegetative state. J Med Ethics 41:534–538

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bernat JL (2009) Ethical issues in the treatment of severe brain injury: the impact of new technologies. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1157:117–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bernat JL (2010) Current controversies in states of chronic unconsciousness. Neurol Clin Pract 75(Suppl 1):S33–S38

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bernat JL (2009) Chronic consciousness disorders. Annu Rev Med 60:381–392

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bruno M-A, Laureys S, Demertzi A (2013) Coma and disorders of consciousness. Handb Clin Neurol 118:205–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Owen AM (2008) Disorders of consciousness. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1124:225–238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Owen AM, Coleman MR, Boly M, Davis MH, Laureys S, Pickard JD (2006) Detecting awareness in the vegetative state. Science 313:1402

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bardin JC, Fins JJ, Katz DI et al (2011) Dissociations between behavioural and functional magnetic imaging-based evaluations of cognitive functioning after brain injury. Brain 134:769–782

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bardin JC, Schiff ND, Voss HU (2012) Pattern classification of volitional magnetic resonance imaging responses in patients with severe brain injury. Arch Neurol 69:176–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Monti MM, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Coleman MR et al (2010) Willful modulation of brain activity in disorders of consciousness. N Engl J Med 362:579–589

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rosanova M, Gosseries O, Casarotto S et al (2012) Recovery of cortical effective connectivity and recovery of consciousness in vegetative patients. Brain 135:1308–1320

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Monti MM, Rosenberg M, Finoia P, Kamau E, Pickard JD, Owen AM (2015) Thalamo-frontal connectivity mediates top-down cognitive functions in disorders of consciousness. Neurology 84:167–173

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Celesia GG (2013) Conscious awareness in patients in vegetative states: myth or reality? Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 13:395–397

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ropper AH (2010) Cogito ergum sum by MRI. N Engl J Med 362:648–649

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Billings JA, Churchill LR, Payne R (2010) Severe brain injury and the subjective life. Hastings Cent Rep 40(3):17–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fins JJ (2012) Wait, wait …don’t tell me: tuning in the injured brain. Arch Neurol 69:158–160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cruse D, Chennu S, Chatelle C et al (2012) Relationship between etiology and covert cognition in the minimally conscious state. Neurology 78:816–822

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fingelkurts AA, Fingelkurts AA, Bagnato S, Boccagni C, Galardi G (2012) EEG oscillatory states as neuro-phenomenology of consciousness as revealed from patients in vegetative and minimally conscious states. Conscious Cogn 21:149–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Forgacs PB, Conte MM, Fridman EA, Voss HU, Victor JD, Schiff ND (2014) Preservation of electroencephalographic organization in patients with impaired consciousness and imaging-based evidence of command-following. Ann Neurol 76:869–879

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Faugeras F, Rohaut B, Weiss N et al (2011) Probing consciousness with event-related potentials in the vegetative state. Neurology 77:264–268

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Luauté J, Cotton F, Lemaire J-J et al (2012) Let live or let die after traumatic coma: scrutinizing somatosensory evoked potentials. Neurol Clin Pract 2(1):24–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Avidan MS, Zhang L, Burnside BA et al (2008) Anesthesia awareness and the bispectral index. N Engl J Med 358:1097–1108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cruse D, Chennu S, Bekinschtein TA et al (2011) Bedside detection of awareness in the vegetative state: a cohort study. Lancet 378:2088–2094

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Goldfine AM, Bardin JC, Noirhomme Q, Fins JJ, Schiff ND, Victor JD (2013) Reanalysis of “bedside detection of awareness in the vegetative state: a cohort study”. Lancet 381:289–291, and author’s reply (2013). Lancet 381:291–292

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Multi-Society Task Force on PVS (1994) Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state: parts I and II. N Engl J Med 330:1499–1508, 1572–1579

    Google Scholar 

  32. Bernat JL (2013) Increasing awareness in unawareness. JAMA Neurol 70:1231–1232

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Schnakers C, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Giacino J et al (2009) Diagnostic accuracy of the vegetative and minimally conscious state: clinical consensus versus standardized neurobehavioral assessment. BMC Neurol 9:35

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Giacino JT, Kalmar K, Whyte J (2004) The JFK coma recovery scale-revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85:2020–2029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Racine E, Rodrigue C, Bernat JL, Riopelle R, Shemie SD (2010) Observations on the ethical and social aspects of disorders of consciousness. Can J Neurol Sci 37:758–768

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Coleman MR, Davis MH, Rodd JM et al (2009) Towards the routine use of brain imaging to aid the clinical diagnosis of disorders of consciousness. Brain 132:2541–2552

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Stender J, Gosseries O, Bruno M-A, Charland-Verville V, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Demertzi A et al (2014) Diagnostic precision of PET imaging and functional MRI in disorders of consciousness: a clinical validation study. Lancet 384:514–522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Estraneo A, Moretta P, Loreto V et al (2010) Late recovery after traumatic, anoxic, or hemorrhagic long-lasting vegetative state. Neurology 75:239–245

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Estraneo A, Moretta P, Loreto V et al (2013) Predictors of recovery of responsiveness in prolonged anoxic vegetative state. Neurology 80:464–470

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Luauté J, Maucort-Boulch D, Tell L et al (2010) Long-term outcomes of chronically minimally conscious and vegetative states. Neurology 75:246–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Steppacher I, Kaps M, Kissler J (2014) Will time heal? A long-term follow-up of severe disorders of consciousness. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 1:401–408

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Di HB, Yu SM, Weng XC et al (2007) Cerebral response to patient’s own name in the vegetative and minimally conscious states. Neurology 68:895–899

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. John ER, Halper JP, Lowe RS III, Merkin H, Defina P, Prichep LS (2011) Source imaging of QEEG as a method to detect awareness in a person in a vegetative state. Brain Inj 25:426–432

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Katz DI, Polyak M, Coughlan D et al (2009) Natural history of recovery from brain injury after prolonged disorders of consciousness: outcome of patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation with 2-4 year follow-up. Prog Brain Res 177:73–88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Whyte J, Gosseries O, Chervoneva I et al (2009) Predictors of short-term outcome in brain-injured patients with disorders of consciousness. Prog Brain Res 177:63–72

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Voss HU, Uluğ AM, Dyke JP et al (2006) Possible axonal regrowth in late recovery from the minimally conscious state. J Clin Invest 116:2005–2011

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Nakase-Richardson R, Yablon SA, Sherer M, Nick TG, Evans CC (2009) Emergence from minimally conscious state: insights from evaluation of posttraumatic coma. Neurology 73:1120–1126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Naci L, Owen AM (2013) Making every word count for nonresponsive patients. JAMA Neurol 70:1235–1241

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. American Academy of Neurology Quality Standards Subcommittee (1995) Practice parameters: assessment and management of patients in the persistent vegetative state (summary statement). Neurology 45:1015–1018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. National Health and Medical Research Council (2008) Ethical guidelines for the care of people in post-coma unresponsiveness. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council: Canberra, Australia. [http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines-publications/e81-e82]

  51. Constable C (2012) Withdrawal of artificial nutrition and hydration for patients in a permanent vegetative state: changing tack. Bioethics 26(3):157–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Gipson J, Kahane G, Savulescu J (2014) Attitudes of lay people to withdrawal of treatment in brain damaged patients. Neuroethics 7:109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Varelius J (2013) Pascal’s Wager and deciding about life-sustaining treatment of patients in persistent vegetative state. Neuroethics 6:277–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Wilkinson DJ, Kahane G, Horne M, Savulescu J (2009) Functional neuroimaging and withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy from vegetative patients. J Med Ethics 35:508–511

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Holloway RG, Quill TE (2010) Treatment decisions after brain injury – tensions among quality, preference, and cost. N Engl J Med 362:1757–1759

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. King JS, Moulton BW (2006) Rethinking informed consent: the case for shared medical decision-making. Am J Law Med 32:429–501

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Laureys S, Pellas F, Van Eeckhout P et al (2009) The locked-in syndrome: what it is like to be conscious but paralyzed and voiceless. Prog Brain Res 150:495–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Lombardi F, Taricco M, De Tanti A, Telaro E, Liberati A (2002) Sensory stimulation of brain-injured individuals in coma or vegetative state: results of a Cochrane systematic review. Clin Rehabil 16:464–472

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Giacino JT, Whyte J, Bagiella E et al (2012) Placebo-controlled trial of amantadine for severe traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med 366:819–826

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Brefel-Courbon C, Payoux P, Ory F et al (2007) Clinical and imaging evidence of zolpidem effect in hypoxic encephalopathy. Ann Neurol 62:102–105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Schiff ND, Giacino JT, Fins JJ (2009) Deep brain stimulation, neuroethics, and the minimally conscious state: moving beyond proof of principle. Arch Neurol 66:697–702

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Giacino J, Fins JJ, Machado A, Schiff ND (2012) Central thalamic deep brain stimulation to promote recovery from chronic posttraumatic minimally conscious state: challenges and opportunities. Neuromodulation 15:339–349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Thibaut A, Bruno M-A, Ledoux D, Demertzi A, Laureys S (2014) tDCS in patients with disorders of consciousness: sham-controlled randomized double-blind study. Neurology 82:1112–1118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Giacino JT, Katz DI, Whyte J (2013) Neurorehabilitation in disorders of consciousness. Semin Neurol 33:142–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Eilander JJ, Wijnen VJ, Scheirs JG, de Kort PL, Prevo AJ (2005) Children and young adults in a prolonged unconscious state due to severe brain injury: outcome after early intensive neurorehabilitation programme. Brain Inj 19:425–436

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Giacino JT, Hirsch J, Schiff N, Laureys S (2006) Functional neuroimaging applications for assessment and rehabilitation planning in patients with disorders of consciousness. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87(12 Suppl 2):S67–S76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Fins JJ (2005) Clinical pragmatism and the care of brain-damaged patients: toward a palliative neuroethics for disorders of consciousness. Prog Brain Res 150:569–586

    Google Scholar 

  68. Bressman JO, Reidler JS (2010) Willful modulation of brain activity in disorders of consciousness: legal and ethical ramifications. J Law Med Ethics 38:713–716

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Fisher CE, Appelbaum PS (2010) Diagnosing consciousness: neuroimaging, law, and the vegetative state. J Law Med Ethics 38:374–385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Bernat JL (2008) Ethical issues in neurology, 3rd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  71. Lo B, Dornbrand L, Wolf LE, Groman M (2002) The Wendland case –withdrawing life support from incompetent patients who are not terminally ill. N Engl J Med 346:1489–1493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Yaffe G (2013) Neurologic disorder and criminal responsibility. Handb Clin Neurol 118:345–356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Cochrane TI (2013) Withdrawing and withholding life-sustaining treatment. Handb Clin Neurol 118:147–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Larriviere D, Bonnie RJ (2006) Terminating artificial nutrition and hydration in persistent vegetative state patients: current and proposed state laws. Neurology 66:1624–1628

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Sleigh J, Warnaby CE (2014) Functional brain imaging: gatecrashing the clinical party? Lancet 384:476–477

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James L. Bernat MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bernat, J.L. (2016). The Medical Practice Impact of Functional Neuroimaging Studies in Patients with Disorders of Consciousness. In: Monti, M., Sannita, W. (eds) Brain Function and Responsiveness in Disorders of Consciousness. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21425-2_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21425-2_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21424-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-21425-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics