Skip to main content

Sociorobot Field Studies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sociorobot World

Part of the book series: Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering ((ISCA,volume 80))

  • 886 Accesses

Abstract

Sociorobots were applied in numerous structured and real-life environments, in which their social interaction capabilities were tested and evaluated. In most studies the two principal ways of assessment followed are: direct observation where full sessions were monitored and video-taped, and questionnaires where participants answer appropriate ‘yes/no’ questions. This chapter summarizes the results of a number of field studies concerning the social performance, entertainment, companionship, and therapeutic competencies of ten sociorobots, namely: QRIO and NAO walking humanoids, COSMOBOT, BANDIT and PEARL wheeled mobile humanoids, KASPAR and ROBOTA fixed-place humanoids, and AIBO, PARO and PLEO zoomorphic robots.

I am not a robot, I have a heart and I bleed.

Serena Williams

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. T. Ishida, Development of a small biped entertainment robot QRIO. in Micro-Nanomechatronics Human Science (2007), pp. 2483–2488

    Google Scholar 

  2. F. Tanaka, B. Fortenberg, K.Aisaka, J.R. Movellan, Developing dance interaction between QRIO and toddlers in a classroom environment: plans for the first steps. in Proceedings IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (ROMAN 2005), Nashville, U.S.A., 13–15 Aug 2005, pp. 223–228

    Google Scholar 

  3. F. Tanaka, A. Cicourel, J.R. Movellan, Socialization between toddlers and robots at an early childhood education center. PNAS 104(46), 17954–17958 (2007). (www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0707769104/DC1)

    Google Scholar 

  4. F. Tanaka, H. Suzuki, Dance interaction with QRIO: a case study for non-boring interaction by using an entertainment ensemble model. in Proceedings Intern. Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive communication (RO-MAN-05), 2004, pp. 419–424

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Chernova, M. Veloso, Teaching multi-robot coordination using demonstration of communication and state sharing. in Proceedings 7th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS), Estori, Portugal, 12–16 May 2008, pp. 1383–1386

    Google Scholar 

  6. C.L. Bethel, M.R. Stevenson, B. Scassellati, Secret-sharing: interaction between a child, robot, and adult. in Proceedings 2001 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC 2011), Anchorage, AK, U.S.A., 9–12 Oct 2011, pp. 2489–2494

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Sarabia, Y. Demiris, A humanoid robot companion for wheelchair users. in Proceedings International Conference on Social Robotics (ICSR 2013) Berlin/London, Springer, 2013, pp. 432–441

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Diaz, N. Nuno, J. Saez-Pons, D. Pardo, C. Angulo, A. Andres, Building up child-robot relationship: from initial attraction towards social engagement. in Proceedings Human-Robot Interaction Workshop on Expectations in Initiative Human Robot Interaction, Lauzanne, Switzerland, 2011, pp. 17–22

    Google Scholar 

  9. J.C.C. Gillesen, E.I. Barakova, B.E.B.M. Huskens, L.M.G. Feijs, From training to robot behavior: towards custom scenarios for robotics in training programs autism spectrum disorders (ASD). in Proceedings 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Rehab Week Zurich, ETH Zurich Science City, Switzerland, 29 June–1 July 2011, pp. 387–393

    Google Scholar 

  10. A.J. Brisben, C.S. Safos, A.D. Lockerd, J.M. Vice, C.E. Lathan, The CosmoBot TM system: evaluating its usability in therapy sessions with children diagnosed with cerebral palsy. Special Issue: ‘Robots’, 12. 14–16 April 2005

    Google Scholar 

  11. A.J. Brisben, A.D. Lockerd, C.E. Lathan, Design evolution for therapy. Telemedicine and e-Health 10, 252–259 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. K.A. Coleman Wood, C.E. Lathan, K.R. Kaufman, Development of an interactive upper extremity gestural robotic feedback system: from bench to reality. in Proceedings IEEE Conference on Engineering Medicine, Biology and Society (IEMBS’2009), San Francisco, CA, U.S.A., 1–5 Sept 2004, pp. 5973–5976

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Woods, K. Dautenhanh, K. Schulz, The design space of robots: investigating children’s views. in Proceedings IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan, 2004, pp. 47–52

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Mead, E.R. Wade, P.Johnson, A. St. Clair, S. Chen, M.J. Mataric, An architecture for rehabilitation task practice in socially assistive human-robot interaction. in Proceedings 19th IEEE International Symposium on Human-Robot Interactive Communication, Viareggio, Italy, 2010, pp. 404–409

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. Gockley, M.J. Mataric, Encouraging physical therapy with hand-off mobile robot. in Proceedings First International Conference on Human Robot Interaction (HRI’06), Salt Lake City, Utah, 2006, pp. 150–155

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Tapus, M.J. Mataric, User personality matching with hands-off robot for post-stroke rehabilitation the rapy, in Experimental Robotics, STAR39, ed. by O. Khatib, V. Kumar, D. Rus (Springer, Berlin, 2008), pp. 165–175

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. M.E. Pollack, M.E. Brown et al., PEARL: a mobile robotic assistant for the elderly. in Proceedings AAAI Workshop on Automation as Caregiver: The Role of Intelligent Technology in Eldercare, August (Tech. Report WS-02-02), 2002, pp. 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Montemerlo, J. Pineau, N. Roy, S. Thrun, V. Varma, Experiences with a mobile robotic guide for the elderly, in Proceedings 7th AAAI National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Edmonton, Alberta, 28 July–1 Aug, 2002, pp. 587–592

    Google Scholar 

  19. K. Dautenhahn, I. Werry, Toward interactive robots in autism therapy: background, motivation and challenges. Pragmat. Cogn. 12(1), 1–35 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. B. Robins, K. Dautenhahn, P. Dickerson, From isolation to communication: a case study evaluation of robot assisted play for children with autism with a minimally expressive humanoid robot. in Proceedings 2nd International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions (ACHI’09), Cancum, Mexico, 1–7 Feb 2009, pp. 205–211

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. Wainer, K. Dautenhahn, B. Robins, F. Amirabdollahian, Collaborating with Kaspar: using an autonomous humanoid robot to foster cooperative dyadic play among children with autism. in Proceedings 2010 IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, Nashville, TN, U.S.A., 6–8 Dec 2010, pp. 631–638

    Google Scholar 

  22. S. Costa, H. Lehmann, B. Robins, K. Dautenhahn, F. Soares, Where is your nose? Developing body awareness skills among children with autism using a humanoid robot. in Proceedings 6th International Conference on Advances in Computer–Human Interactions (ACHI’13), Nice, France, 2013, pp. 117–122

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. Billard, B. Robins, J. Nadel, K. Dautenhahn, Building robota: a mini-humanoid robot for the rehabilitation of children with autism. RESNA Assistave Tech. J. 19(1), 37–49 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. C.M. Stanton, P.H. Kahn, Jr., R.L. Severson, J.H. Ruckert, B.T. Gill, Robotic animals might aid in the social development of children with autism. in Proceedings 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human–Robot Interaction, New York, ACM, 2008, pp. 97–104

    Google Scholar 

  25. G.F. Melson, P.H. Kahn Jr, A. Beck, B. Friedman, Robotic pets in human lives: implications for the human-animal bond and for human relationship with personified technologies. J. Social Issues 65(3), 545–567 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. G.F. Melson, P.H. Kahn Jr, A. Beck, B. Friedman, T. Roberts, E. Garrett, B.T. Gill, Children’s behavior toward understanding of robotic and living dogs. J. Appl. Dev. Psychol. 30, 92–102 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. C.D. Kidd, C. Breazeal, Designing a sociable robot system for weight maintenance. in Proceedings 3rd IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC 2006), vol. 1, January 2006, pp. 253–257

    Google Scholar 

  28. T. Shibata, T. Mitsui, K. Wada, A. Touda, T. Kumasaka, K. Tagani, K. Tanie, Mental commit robot and its application to therapy of children. in Proceedings of IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM 2001), vol. 2, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  29. P. Marti, M. Bacigalupo, L. Giusti, C. Mennecozzi, T. Shibata, Socially assistive robotics in the treatment of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia, Science, Oct, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  30. W. Taggart, S. Turkle, C.D. Kidd, An alternative robot in a nursing home: preliminary remarks. in Proceedings International Conference ‘Toward Social Mechanisms of Android Science’, Cognitive Science Society, July 2005

    Google Scholar 

  31. T. Shibata, T. Tashima, K. Tanie, Emergence of emotional behavior through physical interaction between human and robot. in Proceedings 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Detroit, Michigan, 10–15 May 1999

    Google Scholar 

  32. S.T. Hansen, H.J. Andersen, T. Bak, Practical evaluation of robots for elderly in Denmark: an overview, in Proceedings 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human–Robot Interaction, vol. 5, 2010, pp. 149–150

    Google Scholar 

  33. M. Heerink, M. Diaz, J. Albo-Canals, C. Angulo, A. Barco, J. Casacuberta, C. Garriga, A field study with primary school children on perception of social presence and interactive behavior with a pet robot with primary school children. in Proceedings 21st IEEE International Symposium Robot–Human Interactive Communications, (ROMAN 2012), Paris, France, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  34. E. Kim, R. Paul, B. Scasselatti, Rich spontaneous, social engagement between ASD children and dinosaur robot, Poster. in International Meeting for Autism Research, Chicago, IL, 7–9 May 2009

    Google Scholar 

  35. B. Robins, K. Dautenhahn, Tactile interactions with a humanoid robot: novel play scenario with children with autism. Int. J. Social Robot. 6, 397–415 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. J. Wainer, B. Robins, F. Amirabdollahian, K. Dautenhahn, Using the humanoid robot KASPAR to autonomously play triadic games and facilitate collaborative play among children wit autism. IEEE Trans. Auton. Ment. Dev. 6(3), 183–197 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Spyros Tzafestas .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tzafestas, S. (2016). Sociorobot Field Studies. In: Sociorobot World. Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering, vol 80. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21422-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21422-1_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21421-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-21422-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics