Abstract
A seismic array is defined as a set of seismic sensors, with the same response functions, recording time synchronized and deployed in a homogeneous area according to a certain configuration, with the aim of obtaining a coherent spatial sampling of the seismic wavefield in time. From the analysis point of view, what defines an array is the collective waveform processing. In a network, the phases are picked and the arrival times are determined on each station separately; in an array, all channels are processed together, as different spatial samples of the same time-varying wavefield.
In the array, the stations are close enough so that the waveforms recorded with them from a distant event (distant in terms of the array size) will be very similar, except for the time delay and the added local noise. The detected signals are correlated, while the noise – both local ground noise and perhaps instrumental noise – is not. This allows the enhancement of the signal-to-noise ratio by summing the records with the suitable delays so that the wanted signal will be in phase on all channels. We can also measure the velocity of the wavefront as it is moving horizontally across the array. We call this apparent velocity since it is what the velocity appears to be in the horizontal plane. Similarly we can measure the azimuth of the arriving waveform. Both parameters can be used for locating the earthquake and the apparent velocity also for determining the type of seismic phase.
The present development of seismic arrays is partly due to the recommendation by a group of experts in 1958 of improving the quality of seismic stations worldwide as a mean of detecting possible violations of the agreement of nuclear test suspension. The availability of smaller sensors, better data acquisition systems and powerful computers has extended the use of arrays from global seismicity monitoring to regional and local seismicity studies and even portable arrays are now quite common.
Arrays are constructed with different dimensions and sensors depending on their intended use. The arrays for global studies will have dimensions in the km range while arrays for small local earthquakes can be in the order of a few hundred meters. It is important that the arrays do not have a spatially periodic geometry to avoid spatial aliasing (for an incoming wave there is then two or more equally good solutions for apparent velocity and azimuth). This can be checked by calculating the array transfer function which is a two-dimensional figure showing the improvement in signal to noise ratio as a function of apparent velocity and azimuth.
Examples of arrays will be given.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Abril M (2007) Evolución, diseño y desarrollo de antenas sísmicas. Las antenas del Gran Sasso, del Vesubio y las nuevas antenas sísmicas portátiles del Instituto Andaluz de Geofísica (in spanish). Ph. thesis, University of Granada, 729 pp. http://0-hera.ugr.es.adrastea.ugr.es/tesisugr/16715184.pdf. Last accessed May 2014
Aki K (1957) Space and time spectra of stationary stochastic waves, with special reference to microtremors. Bull Earthq Res Inst Tokyo Univ 25:415–457
Alguacil G, Almendros FJ, Del Pezzo E, García A, Ibáñez JM, La Rocca M, Morales J, Ortiz R (1999) Observations of volcanic earthquakes and tremor at Deception Island – Antarctica. Ann Geofis 42:417–436
Almendros J, Ibáñez JM, Alguacil G, Del Pezzo E, Ortiz R (1997) Array tracking of the volcanic tremor source at Deception Island. Antarctica Geophys Res Lett 24:3069–3072
Almendros J, Ibáñez J, Alguacil G, Del Pezzo E (1999) Array analysis using circular wavefront geometry: an application to locate the nearby seismo-volcanic source. Geophys J Int 136:159–170
Almendros J, Ibáñez JM, Carmona E, Zandomeneghi D (2007) Array analyses of volcanic earthquakes and tremor recorded at Las Cañadas caldera (Tenerife Island, Spain) during the 2004 seismic activation of Teide volcano. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 160:285–299
Almendros J, Abella R, Mora M, Lesage P (2012) Time-dependent spatial amplitude patterns of harmonic tremor at Arenal Volcano, Costa Rica: seismic-wave interferences? Bull Seismol Soc Am 102:2378–2391
Al-Shukri H, Pavlis GL, Vernon FL III (1995) Site effect observations from broadband arrays. Bull Seismol Soc Am 85:1758–1769
Aoi S, Iwata T, Fujiwara H, Irikura K (1997) Boundary shape waveform inversion for two-dimensional basin structure using three-component array data of plane incident wave with an arbitrary azimuth. Bull Seismol Soc Am 87:222–233
Asten MW, Henstridge JD (1984) Array estimators and the use of microseism for reconnaissance of sedimentary basins. Geophysics 49:1828–1837
Barker JS, Campillo M, Sánchez-Sesma FJ, Jongmans D, Singh SK (1996) Analysis of wave propagation in the Valley of Mexico from a dense array of seismometers. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86:1667–1680
Bodin P, Gomberg J, Singh SK, Santoyo M (1997) Dynamic deformations of shallow sediments in the Valley of Mexico, Part I: Three-dimensional strains and rotations recorded on a seismic array. Bull Seismol Soc Am 87:528–539
Bormann P (ed) (2012) New Manual of Seismological Observatory Practice (NMSOP-2), IASPEI, GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam; nmsop.gfz-potsdam.de
Bungum H, Husebye ES (1974) Analysis of the operational capabilities for detection and location of seismic events at NORSAR. Bull Seismol Soc Am 64:637–656
Bungum H, Husebye ES, Ringdal F (1971) The NORSAR array and preliminary results of data analysis. Geophys J 25:115–126
Capon J (1970) Analysis of Rayleigh-wave multipath propagation at LASA. Bull Seismol Soc Am 60:1701–1731
Carmona E, Almendros J, Serrano I, Stich D, Ibáñez JM (2012) Results of seismic monitoring surveys of Deception Island volcano, Antarctica, from 1999–2011. Antarct Sci 24:485–499
Chávez-García FJ, Rodríguez M, Stephenson WR (2005) An alternative to the SPAC analysis of microtremors: exploiting stationarity of noise. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95:277–293
Chiu JM, Steiner G, Smalley R, Johnston AC (1991) PANDA: a simple, portable seismic array for local- to regional-scale seismic experiments. Bull Seismol Soc Am 81:1000–1014
Chouet B, De Luca G, Milana G, Dawson P, Martini M, Scarpa R (1998) Shallow velocity structure of Stromboli Volcano, Italy derived from small-aperture array measurements of Strombolian tremor. Bull Seismol Soc Am 88:653–666
Dainty AM, Toksoz MN (1990) Array analysis of seismic scattering. Bull Seismol Soc Am 80:2242–2260
Del Pezzo E, La Rocca M, Ibañez JM (1997) Observations of high-frequency scattered waves using dense arrays at Teide Volcano. Bull Seismol Soc Am 87:1637–1647
Ferrazzini V, Aki K, Chouet BA (1991) Characteristics of seismic waves composing Hawaiian volcanic tremor and gas-piston events observed by a near-source array. J Geophys Res 96:6199–6209
Frankel A (1994) Dense array recordings in the San Bernardino Valley of landers-big bear aftershocks: Basin surface waves, Moho reflections, and three-dimensional simulations. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84:613–624
Green PE, Frosch RA, Romney CF (1965) Principles of an experimental large aperture seismic array (LASA). Proc IEEE 53:1821–1833
Gupta IN, Lynnes CS, McElfresh TW, Wagner RA (1990) F-K analysis of NORESS array and single-station data to identify sources of near-receiver and near-source scattering. Bull Seismol Soc Am 80:2227–2241
Ibáñez JM, Carmona E, Almendros J, Saccorotti G, Del Pezzo E, Abril M, Ortiz R (2003) The 1998–1999 seismic series at Deception Island volcano, Antarctica. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 128:65–88
Iida M, Miyatake T, Shimazaki K (1990) Relationship between strong-motion array parameters and the accuracy of source inversion, and physical waves. Bull Seismol Soc Am 80:1533–1552
Niazi M, Bozorgnia Y (1991) Behavior of near-source peak horizontal and vertical ground motions over SMART-1 array. Taiwan Bull Seismol Soc Am 81:715–732
Scarpa R, Muscente R, Tronca F, Fishione C, Rotella P, Abril M, Alguacil G, De Cesare W, Martini M (2004) UNDERSEIS: the underground seismic array. Seismol Res Lett 75:493–504
Tada T, Cho I, Shinozaki Y (2007) Beyond the SPAC method: exploiting the wealth of circular-array methods for microtremor exploration. Bull Seismol Soc Am 97:2080–2095
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Havskov, J., Alguacil, G. (2016). Seismic Arrays. In: Instrumentation in Earthquake Seismology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21314-9_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21314-9_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21313-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-21314-9
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)