Skip to main content
  • 1840 Accesses

Abstract

Processing of seismic signals is now completely digital. The analog signals from the seismic sensors must therefore be converted to numbers readable by a computer. This is done with a so-called analog to digital converter (ADC). The continuous analog signal is converted to a series of numbers representing the signal samples at discrete time intervals. The amplitude resolution is typically 1 μV and the time interval is typically 10 ms corresponding to a rate of 100 samples/s. The digitization will introduce errors (quantization errors) into the data since a continuously varying signal is replaced with a limited number of discrete values. Much of the efforts in improving the ADC process are related to minimizing these errors.

An ADC will give an output binary number when we put in a specific voltage. Currently most digitizers give out a number from 0 to 216 or 224 (or ±215 and ±223) and are correspondingly called 16 and 24 bit converters with dynamic ranges 90 and 138 dB respectively provided the digitizer do not generate noise itself.

In order to obtain the highest dynamic range, converters use the technique of sampling with a high sample rate, low pass filter the signal and resample at a lower rate. The quantization errors of the individual samples in the oversampled trace are averaged over neighbouring samples by the low pass filter and the averaged samples therefore have more accuracy. This is used in the most common converter, the Sigma Delta ADC which digitize with a very low resolution (typically 1 bit or only level 0 and 1) but a very high sampling rate so that successive samples are highly correlated, get an estimate of the signal level, add the quantization error to the input signal, get a new estimate etc. This process will continue forever and the actual value of the input signal is obtained by averaging a large number of estimates and limiting the signal bandwidth with a numeric low-pass filter.

In addition to the quantization error in amplitude, errors can also be introduced due to the discrete steps taken in time which means that signals with a frequency higher that half the sample rate (Nyquist frequency) cannot be resolved. If they are present, the digitized signal will be distorted. This a called aliasing and all digitizers must have a filter to remove signals above the Nyquist frequency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aziz PM, Sorensen HV, Van Der Spiegel J (1996) An overview of Sigma-Delta Converters. IEEE Signal Process Mag 13:61–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fréchet J, Meghraoui M, Stucchi M (eds) (2008) Historical seismology: interdisciplinary studies of past and recent earthquakes. Springer, London, 443 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Kromer RP, McDonald TS (1999) Report on the test evaluation of the Kinemetrics/Quanterra Q73B borehole digitizer. Sandia National Laboratories report SAND99-2709, 36 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheim AV, Shafer RW (1989) Discrete time signal processing. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Proakis JG, Manolakis DG (1992) Digital signal processing principles, algorithms and applications. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherbaum F (2007) Of poles and zeros, fundamentals of digital seismology, rev. second edn. Springer, Dordrecht, 271 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Sleeman R, van Wettum A, Trampert J (2006) Three-channel correlation analysis: a new technique to measure instrumental noise of digitizers and seismic sensors. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96:258–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soderquist D (1979) Minimization of noise in operational amplifier applications. In: 1981 Full Line Catalogue. Precision Monolithics Inc, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Steim JM, Wielandt E (1985) Report on the Very Broad Band Seismograph. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 34 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Stich D, Alguacil G, Morales J (2001) The relative location of multiplets in the vicinity of the Western Almería (Southern Spain) earthquake series of 1993-1994. Geophys J Int 146:801–812

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Havskov, J., Alguacil, G. (2016). Analog to Digital Converter. In: Instrumentation in Earthquake Seismology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21314-9_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics