Skip to main content

Now What Might We Do?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Slavoj Žižek

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Education ((BRIEFSKEY))

  • 702 Accesses

Abstract

Žižek warns us that that we become enslaved to particular ideas and beliefs which implicate our inner-most unconscious desires and drives. Dialectically, being ‘critical’ about these ideas can work as an insidious way for such ideas to tighten their grip. So what can teachers and students do to bring about something else? Can we escape enslavery? For Žižek, we cannot escape the very Symbolic which guides us in knowing how to act in practice, and which manifests throughout vast educational and broader regulatory systems. So whatcan we do? This, Žižek points out, is our task rather than his, and refuses to provide specific actions for us—and is this not fully aligned to a slippery ‘hag fish’ pedagogy where we have to find the answers? Crucially, Žižek raises the urgency of a need to act, and gives us glimpses into directions that we might consider. Educational researchers have taken Žižek’s inspiration and call to action, and have documented how they have constructed alternative actions in practice. Their interpretations have involved attempting to draw from different zones of the Symbolic realm, and patiently considering how such activity appears to be implicating themselves and others in their educational practices. Yet these are never definitive, victory narratives, as Žižek reminds us of Lacan’s famous statement “les non-dupes errent”: only those who think they have not been duped have already been duped. Such attempts do act, however, as beacons towards producing different understandings of education, and therefore hold the potential for change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aitkenhead, D. (2012). The Guardian - Slavoj Žižek: ‘Humanity is OK, but 99 % of people are boring idiots’. Retrieved March 14, 2015, from http://www.theguardian.com/culture/2012/jun/10/slavoj-zizek-humanity-ok-people-boring.

  • Barltrop, R. (1975). The Monument: The story of the Socialist Party of Great Britain. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. (2000). Realizing the University in an age of supercomplexity. Buckingham: Open University/Society for Research into Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. (2003). Beyond all reason: Living with ideology in the University. London: Society for Research into Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. (2011). The coming of the ecological University. Oxford Review of Education, 37(4), 439–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolden, R., Connor, H., Duquemin, A., Hirsh, W., & Petrov, G. (2009). Employer engagement with higher education: Defining, sustaining, and supporting higher skills provision. London: Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1988). Homo academicus. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, K., & Brown, T. (2005). C’est n’est pas un circle. For the Learning of Mathematics, 25(1), 16–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. (2008). Desire and drive in researcher subjectivity: The broken mirror of Lacan. Qualitative Inquiry, 14(2), 402–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. (2013). The sublime objects of mathematics in schools. Paper presented at the mathematics education and contemporary theory conference, 21st–24th June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T., Atkinson, D., & England, J. (2006). Regulative discourses in education: A Lacanian perspective. London: Peter Lang Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T., & England, J. (2005). Identity, narrative and practitioner research: A Lacanian perspective. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 26(4), 443–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T., & Heywood, D. (2011). Geometry, subjectivity and the seduction of language: The regulation of spatial perception. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 7, 351–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T., & Jones, L. (2001). Action research and postmodernism: Congruence and critique. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T., & McNamara, O. (2011). Becoming a mathematics teacher: Identity and identifications. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T., & Walshaw, M. (2012). Mathematics education and contemporary theory. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1–2), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, R. (2005). Slavoj Žižek: Live Theory. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chahine, I., & Kinuthia, W. (2013). Juxtaposing form function, and social symbolism: An ethnomathematical analysis of Indigenous technologies in the Zulu culture. Journal of Mathematics & Culture, 7(1), 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, A. (2009). Is education a lost cause? Žižek, schooling, and universal emancipation. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 30(4), 381–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Empire State College. (2015). The global learning qualifications framework. Retrieved March 15, 2015, from http://www.esc.edu/suny-real/global-learning-qualifications-framework/.

  • England, J. (2003). Researching race in school: A psychoanalytical perspective. Manchester Metropolitan University.

    Google Scholar 

  • For Dummies. (2015). For dummies [Homepage]. Retrieved March 14, 2015, from http://www.dummies.com/.

  • Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Selected interviews and other writings 1972-77 (pp. 170–194). Brighton: Harvester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furedi, F. (2006). Where have all the intellectuals gone? Confronting 21st Century Philistinism (2nd ed.). London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furedi, F. (2010). Wasted: Why education isn’t educating. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenstreet, R. (2008). The Guardian Q&A: Slavoj Žižek, professor and writer. Retrieved March 14, 2015, from http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2008/aug/09/slavoj.zizek.

  • Habermas, J. (1976). Systematically distorted communication. In P. Connerton (Ed.), Critical Sociology. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaino, L. M. (2013). Traditional knowledge in curricula designs: Embracing indigenous mathematics in classroom instruction. Studies of Tribes and Tribals, 11(1), 83–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mariborchan.si. (2014). Slavoj Zizek - Education, Tutors, Universities, Students. Retrieved October10, 2014, from http://mariborchan.si/video/recordings/slavoj-zizek/slavoj-zizek-education-tutors-universities-students/.

  • Meakin, D., & Wall, T. (2013). Co-delivered work based learning: Contested ownership and responsibility. Higher Education, Skills & Work Based Learning, 3(1), 73–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pais, A. (2011). Mathematics education and the political: An ideology critique of an educational research field. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Aalborg Universitet, Aalborg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrin, D. (2000). The Socialist Party of Great Britain: Politics, economics and Britain’s oldest socialist party. Wrexham: Bridge Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. (1984). Time and narrative (Vol. 1). Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, J. (2002). The intellectual life of the British working classes. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuman, R. (2014). Slate—Please stop worshipping the Superstar Professor who calls students “Boring Idiots”. Retrieved March 14, 2015, from http://www.slate.com/blogs/browbeat/2014/06/02/slavoj_zizek_calls_students_stupid_and_boring_stop_worshiping_this_man_video.html.

  • Smith, K., Hodson, E., & Brown, T. (2013). Teacher educator changing perceptions of theory. Educational Action Research, 21(2), 237–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, T. (2015). Enlightened publics: Popular education movements in Europe, their legacy and promise. Studies in the Education of Adults, 42(2), 107–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. (2010). Žižek and the Media. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tran, L. T. (2013). Teaching international students in vocational education: New pedagogical approaches. Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasagar, J., & Smithers, R. (2003). The Guardian—Will Charles Clarke have his place in history? Retrieved March 14, 2015, from http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2003/may/10/highereducation.politics.

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The Development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall, T. (2013). Professional identities and commodification in higher education. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walshaw, M., & Brown, T. (2012). Affective productions of mathematical experience. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1–2), 185–199. doi:10.1007/s10649-011-9370-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wedgewood, M. (2008). Higher education for the workforce—Barriers and facilitators to employer engagement. London: Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolters, E. (2014). Critical Theory - Professor of the year, “if you don’t give me any of your shitty papers you get an A”. Retrieved March 14, 2015, from http://www.critical-theory.com/professor-of-the-year-if-you-dont-give-me-any-of-your-shitty-papers-you-get-an-a/.

  • Yunkaporta, T., & Kirby, M. (2011). Yarning up indigenous pedagogies: A dialogue about eight aboriginal ways of learning. In N. Purdie, G. Milgate, & H. R. Bell (Eds.), Two way teaching and learning: Toward culturally reflective and relevant education. Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (1989). The sublime object of ideology. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (1994). The spectre of ideology. In S. Žižek (Ed.), Mapping ideology (pp. 1–33). London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (1999). The ticklist subject: The absent centre of political ontology (2008 Verso ed.). London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (2002). Enjoy your symptom! Jacques Lacan in Hollywood and out (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (2006). The parallax view. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (2009). First as tragedy, then as farce. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (2010). A permanent economic emergency. New Left Review, 64, 85–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (2013a). Denial: The Liberal Utopia. Retrieved January 17, from, http://www.lacan.com/essays/?page_id=397.

  • Žižek, S. (2013b). The New Statesman—The simple courage of decision: A leftist tribute to Thatcher. http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/politics/2013/04/simple-courage-decision-leftist-tribute-thatcher.

  • Žižek, S. (2014a). Event. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (2014b). Trouble in paradise: from the end of history to the end of capitalism. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tony Wall .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wall, T., Perrin, D. (2015). Now What Might We Do?. In: Slavoj Žižek. SpringerBriefs in Education(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21242-5_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics