Skip to main content

We Know, but Still

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Slavoj Žižek

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Education ((BRIEFSKEY))

Abstract

As far as Žižek is concerned, our daily lives are intimately tainted and shaped by particular ideas and beliefs which implicate what we see, how we see, and therefore how we relate to each other in educational settings. Within contemporary educational settings, education is being cast in relation to economic utility. This activates particular expectations which generate educational customers and providers: now, in education, the ‘Customer is King’ at many different levels, from school to higher education. For Žižek, these ideas and beliefs have succeeded when we do not notice these particular shapes and forms, or when we do notice them and think they are ‘natural’, or that this is ‘the way education is’. Žižek, however, warns us that the ‘we do not know what we do’ idiom is a faulty one, and does not explain why we can be acutely aware of the troubles in our so called educational paradise, but carry on regardless: we know the limitations of educational audits or student satisfaction surveys, but we spend extraordinary amount of time and effort preparing for them. Žižek’s point here is that ‘we do know, but still’, through our behaviour, carry on. Being critical might appear to be a route to navigate this, but with a true Žižekian twist, can be a direct route for particular ideas and beliefs to take a tighter grip. In this way, such mechanics help to explain another dimension of why it is so challenging to achieve educational transformation on any level, from particular classroom teaching practices, through to the way education operates more broadly within society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aditomo, A., Goodyear, P., Bliuc, A. M., & Ellis, R. A. (2011). Inquiry-based learning in higher education: Principal forms, educational objectives, and disciplinary variations. Studies in Higher Education, 38(9), 1239–1258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Montessori Society. (2015). Frequently asked questions. Retrieved March 14, 2015, from http://amshq.org/Montessori-Education/FAQs.

  • Betts, M., & Smith, R. (1998). Developing the credit-based modular curriculum in higher education: Challenge, choice and change. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolden, R., Connor, H., Duquemin, A., Hirsh, W., & Petrov, G. (2009). Employer engagement with higher education: Defining, sustaining, and supporting higher skills provision. London: Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolden, R., Hirsh, W., Connor, H., Petrov, G., & Duquemin, A. (2010). Strategies for effective HE-employer engagement. London: Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D., & Solomon, N. (2001). Repositioning universities and work. In D. Boud & N. Solomon (Eds.), Work based learning: A new higher education?. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, S. D. (1991). Developing critical thinkers: Challenging adults to explore alternative ways of thinking and acting. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, R. (2005). Slavoj Žižek: Live Theory. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • CBI. (2008). Stepping higher: Workforce development through employer-higher education partnership. London: Confederation of British Industry.

    Google Scholar 

  • CBI. (2009). Stronger together: Businesses and universities in turbulent times. London: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collini, S. (2012). What are universities for? London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, C., Mackinnon, I., & Garside, P. (2008). Employer engagement research report 29. Wath-upon-Dearne: Sector Skills Development Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Castella, T. (2014). BBC News—The anarchic experimental schools of the 1970s. Retrieved March 14, 2015, from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-29518319.

  • Dhillon, B., Edmonds, T., Felce, A., Minton, A., & Wall, T. (2011). Making employer and university partnerships work: Accredited employer-led learning. Faringdon: Libri Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friersona, P. R. (2014). Maria Montessori’s epistemology. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 22(4), 767–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garner, R. (2015). The independent—Free school praised by Michael Gove ordered to close due to bullying and religious bigotry. Retrieved March14, 2015, from, http://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/free-school-praised-by-michael-gove-ordered-to-close-due-to-bullying-and-religious-bigotry-9988859.html.

  • Garnett, J. (2009). Contributing to the intellectual capital of organisations. In J. Garnett, C. Costley, & B. Workman (Eds.), Work based learning: Journeys to the core of higher education. London: Middlesex University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnett, J., Workman, B., Beadsmoore, A., & Bezencenet, S. (2008). Developing the structural capital of higher education institutions to support work based learning. In F. Tallantyre (Ed.), Work-based learning: Workforce development: Connections, frameworks and processes (pp. 18–30). York: The Higher Education Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, P., & Garnett, J. (2007). Work-based learning as a field of study. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 12(3), 409–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • HEFCE. (2014). Review of the national student survey report to the UK higher education funding bodies by NatCen Social Research, the Institute of Education, University of London and the Institute for Employment Studies: Summary Report. London: Higher Education Funding Council for England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lester, S., & Costley, C. (2010). Work-based learning at higher education level: Value, practice and critique. Studies in Higher Education, 35(5), 561–575. doi:10.1080/03075070903216635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mabweazara, H. M., & Taylor, A. (2012). Exploring effective pedagogies for delivering journalism work-based learning in UK higher education. Journal of Media Practice, 13(2), 125–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macintyre, S. (1980). A proletarian science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montessori, M. (1965). The Montessori method: Scientific pedagogy as applied to child education in “The children’s houses”, with additions and revisions by the author. (Anne E. George (Italian), Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Robert Bentley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neill, A. S. (1960). Summerhill: A radical approach to child rearing. New York: Hart Publishing Co., Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nipissing University. (2015). Journal of Unschooling and Alternative Learning. Retrieved March 14, 2015, from http://jual.nipissingu.ca/.

  • NUT. (2013). Teacher Stress: NUT guidance to divisions and associations. London: The National Union of Teachers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofsted. (2011). Summerhill school—Independent school standard inspection report. Manchester: The Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofsted. (2015). The Durham free school—School inspection report. Manchester: The Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrin, D., & Helyer, R. (2015). Make your learning count: Recognition of prior learning. In R. Helyer (Ed.), The work based learning student handbook. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrin, D., Weston, P., Thompson, P., & Brodie, P. (2009). Facilitating em-ployer engagement through negotiated work based learning. Bristol: Higher Education Funding Council for England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soilemetzidis, I., Bennett, P., Buckley, A., Hillman, N., & Stoakes, G. (2014). The HEPI–HEA student academic experience survey 2014. York: Higher Education Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparkes, A. (2007). Embodiment, academics, and the audit culture: A story seeking consideration. Qualitative Research, 7(4), 521–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talbot, J. (2010). Changing power relations in work based learning: Collaborative and contested relations between tutors, learners and employers. In S. Jackson (Ed.), Innovations in lifelong learning (pp. 187–208). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall, T. (2010). University models of work-based learning validation. In J. Mumford & S. Roodhouse (Eds.), Understanding work-based learning (pp. 41–54). London: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall, T. (2013). Diversity through negotiation. In K. Bridger, I. Reid, & J. Shaw (Eds.), Inclusive higher education: An International perspective on access and the challenge of student diversity. Faringdon: Libri Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wedgewood, M. (2008). Higher education for the workforce—Barriers and facilitators to employer engagement. London: Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, T. (2012). Employer responsive provision: Workforce development through work-based learning. Higher Education, Skills and Work-based Learning, 2(1), 6–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Workman, B. (2010). University challenge: Learning to work with employer engagement. Educational Developments, 11(2), 9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Workman, B., Costley, C., & Garnett, J. (2009). Work-based learning journeys to the core of higher educations. London: Middlesex University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (1989). The sublime object of ideology. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (1991). Looking awry: An introduction to Jacques Lacan through popular culture. London: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (1994). The spectre of ideology. In S. Žižek (Ed.), Mapping ideology (pp. 1–33). London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (2004). www.lacan.com —What Rumsfeld doesn’t know that he knows about Abu Ghraib. Retrieved March 14, 2015, from http://www.lacan.com/zizekrumsfeld.htm.

  • Žižek, S. (2005). With or without passion, whats wrong with fundamentalism?—Part I. Retrieved August 26, 2013, from http://www.lacan.com/zizpassion.htm.

  • Žižek, S. (2006). The parallax view. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (2007). Digression 2—How to make a mobius strip. http://the-zizek-site.blogspot.co.uk/2007/01/digression-2-how-to-make-mobius-strip.html.

  • Žižek, S. (2008). The plague of fantasies (2nd ed.). London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (2009). First as tragedy, then as farce. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tony Wall .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wall, T., Perrin, D. (2015). We Know, but Still . In: Slavoj Žižek. SpringerBriefs in Education(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21242-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics