Advertisement

An Introduction: The Historical-Conceptual Reference Frame

  • Paolo Bussotti
Chapter
  • 399 Downloads
Part of the Science Networks. Historical Studies book series (SNHS, volume 52)

Abstract

Leibniz dealt with planetary theory in three papers written between 1689 and 1706. The first paper, titled Tentamen de Motuum Coelestium Causis, is the only one which was published—in the Acta Eruditorum Lipsiensium, 1689—during Leibniz’s lifetime. In the Tentamen Leibniz tried to construct a planetary theory based on a refinement and specification of the vortex theory. In particular, he attempted to supply a series of mathematical considerations, which allowed him to obtain (1) Kepler’s area law; (2) the inverse square law; (3) ellipticity of the planetary orbits, without resorting to the Newtonian concept of force. Leibniz developed a second version (zweite Bearbeitung) of the Tentamen (see note 1), which was not published at that time, but which presents important specifications, in particular as to: (a) the structure and history of vortex theory; (b) the nature of gravity; (c) the completion of mathematical proofs which were only outlined in the published version.

Keywords

Planetary Orbit Planetary Motion Important Specification Mathematical Consideration Vortex Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aiton EJ (1960) The celestial mechanics of Leibniz. Annals of Science, 16, 2, pp. 65–82. 11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00033796000200059.
  2. Aiton EJ (1962) The celestial mechanics of Leibniz in the light of Newtonian criticism. Annals of Science, 18, 1, pp. 31–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00033796200202682.
  3. Aiton EJ (1964) The celestial mechanics of Leibniz: A new interpretation. Annals of Science, 20, 2, pp. 111–123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00033796400203014.
  4. Aiton EJ (1965) An imaginary error in the celestial mechanics of Leibniz. Annals of Science, 21, 3, pp. 169–173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00033796500200101.
  5. Aiton EJ (1972) The vortex theory of planetary motions. American Elsevier Publishing Company, New York.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Aiton EJ (1984) The mathematical basis of Leibniz’s theory of planetary motion. Studia Leibnitiana, 13, pp. 209–225.Google Scholar
  7. Aiton EJ (1995) The vortex theory in competition with Newtonian celestial dynamics. In The General History of Astronomy: Planetary Astronomy from the Renaissance to the Rise of Astrophysics; vol 2B, The Eighteenth and nineteenth Centuries (Eds R. Taton and C. Wilson), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 3–21.Google Scholar
  8. Bertoloni Meli D (1988a) Leibniz on the Censorship of the Copernican System. Studia Leibnitiana, 20, pp. 19–42.zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. Bertoloni Meli D (1988b) Leibniz’s Excerpts from the Principia Mathematica. Annals of Science, 45, pp. 477–506.zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bertoloni Meli D (1990) The Relativization of Centrifugal Force in the Eighteenth Century. Isis, 81, 306, pp. 23–43.zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bertoloni Meli D (1993) Equivalence and priority: Newton versus Leibniz. Clarendon Press, Oxford.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Bertoloni Meli D (2006) Thinking with Objects. The Transformation of Mechanics in the Seventeenth Century. Johns Opkins University, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  13. Cohen BI (1962) Leibniz on Elliptical Orbits: As Seen in his Correspondence with the Académie Royale des Sciences in 1700. Journal of the History of Medicine, January, pp. 72–82.Google Scholar
  14. Gregory D (1702) Astronomiae physicae et geometricae elementa. Sheldonian Theatre, Oxford.Google Scholar
  15. Hoyer U (1979a) Das Verhältnis der Leibnizschen zur Keplerschen Himmelsmechanik. Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie, X/1, pp. 28–34.Google Scholar
  16. Keill M (1714) Response de M Keill, M. D. Professeur d’Astronomie Savilien aux auteurs des Remarques sue le Different entre M. de Leibniz et M. Newton, publiées dans le Journal Litéraire de la Haye de Novembre et Decembre 1713. Journal Litéraire, 4, pp. 319–352.Google Scholar
  17. Koyré A (1965) Newtonian Studies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Leibniz GW (1689, 1860, 1962) Tentamen de Motuum Coelestium Causis (Erste Bearbeitung). In Leibniz ([1849–1863], 1962), VI volume, pp. 144–161.Google Scholar
  19. Leibniz GW (1690, 1860, 1962) De Causa gravitatis et defensio sententiae Autoris de viris Naturae Legibus contra Cartesianos. In Leibniz ([1849–1863], 1962), VI volume, pp. 193–201.Google Scholar
  20. Leibniz GW (1695, 1860, 1962) Specimen Dynamicum pro admirandis Naturae Legibus circa corporum vires et mutuas actiones detegentis et ad suas causas revocandis. Pars I et Pars II. In Leibniz ([1849–1863], 1962), VI volume, pp. 234–254.Google Scholar
  21. Leibniz GW ([1849–1863], 1962) Mathematische Schriften, 7 volumes (Ed. CI Gerhardt). Georg Olms, Hildesheim.Google Scholar
  22. Newton I (1712?, 1850) Epistola cujusdam ad amicum, in Correspondence of Sir isaac Newton and Professor Cotes, including letters of other eminent men (Ed. J Edleston). Parker, London, pp. 308–314.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paolo Bussotti
    • 1
  1. 1.University of UdineUdineItaly

Personalised recommendations