Skip to main content

The Role of Geriatric Preconditions (Frailty and Disability) in Elderly Patients and Its Possible Impact on Interventions

  • Chapter
  • 579 Accesses

Abstract

With an increasing proportion of patients above 80 years needing treatment for coronary artery disease, a growing percentage of those patients will receive this treatment in the presence of frailty, comorbidity and disability. In a frail organism decreasing organ function and muscular decline lead to a catabolic situation. The questions and challenges for interventional cardiologists, treating such patients are: To which extent will such preconditions impact the chosen treatment route for cardiac disease (either medical, interventional or surgical). If there is any impact, then risk assessment for those patients, who are forwarded to PCI appears crucial in order to identify patients at risk and to re-evaluate treatment strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Afilalo J, Alexander KP, Mack MJ, et al. Frailty assessment in the cardiovascular care of older adults. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;68:747–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Collard RM, Boter H, Schoevers RA, et al. Prevalence of frailty in community dwelling older persons: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60:1487–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Afilalo J, Karunananthan S, Eisenberg MJ, et al. Role of frailty in patients with cardiovascular disease. Am J Cardiol. 2009;103:1616–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Morley JE. Frailty: diagnosis and treatment. J Nutr Health Aging. 2011;8:667–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56:M146–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Makary MA, Segev DL, Pronovost PJ, et al. Frailty as a predictor of surgical outcomes in older patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;6:901–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Singh M, Charanjit SR, Lennon RJ, et al. Influence of frailty and health status on outcomes in patients with coronary disease undergoing percutaneous revascularization. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2011;4:496–502.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Simonsick EM, et al. A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol. 1994;49:m85–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Munoz-Mendoza CL, Cabanero-Martinez MJ, Millana-Calenti JC, et al. Reliability of 4-m and 6-m walking speed test in elderly people with cognitive impairment. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2011;52:67–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Drey M, Pfeifer K, Sieber CC, Bauer JM. The Fried frailty criteria as inclusion criteria for a randomized controlled trial: personal experience and literature review. Gerontology. 2011;57:11–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Purser JL, Kuchibhatla MN, Fillenbaum GG, et al. Identifying frailty in hospitalized older adults with significant coronary artery disease. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54:1674–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gharacholou SM, Roger VL, Lennon RJ, et al. Comparison of frail patients versus nonfrail patients >65 years of age undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2012;109:1569–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McNulty EJ, Ng W, Spertus JA, et al. Surgical candidacy and selection biases in nonemergent left main stenting: implications for observational studies. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;9:1020–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ekerstad N, Swahn E, Janzon M, et al. Frailty is independently associated with short-term outcomes for elderly patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2011;124:2397–404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Graham M, Galbraith PD, O’Neill D, et al. Frailty and outcome in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome. Can J Cardiol. 2013;29:1610–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Stortecky S, Schoenenberger AW, Moser A, et al. Evaluation of multidimensional geriatric assessment as a predictor of mortality and cardiovascular events after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5:489–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harald Rittger MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rittger, H. (2015). The Role of Geriatric Preconditions (Frailty and Disability) in Elderly Patients and Its Possible Impact on Interventions. In: Rittger, H. (eds) Interventional Cardiology in the Elderly. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21142-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21142-8_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21141-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-21142-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics