Abstract
The paper reviews selected approaches and methods for assessing R&D projects useful for effective innovation management. It presents a method of simplified assessment based on the concept of the threshold (minimum) value of economic effects, i.e. the value covering capitalised project expenditures constituting the basis for estimating the rate of economic efficiency for variants of the implementation of R&D projects. The lower the rate of economic effects based on their threshold value, the more efficient the R&D project is. The usefulness of the proposed method is assessed based on the example of a research unit conducting activities in the area of advanced research and development of technical solutions and their deployment in the field of electro-technical equipment and systems. The presented method of evaluation of R&D projects can be used in the initial assessment of the project, at the phase of preparation of the project concept when the research unit seeks to choose variants of implementation, as well as at various stages of project implementation (at R&D project checkpoints) when the research unit seeks to effectively manage the research process, deciding whether to continue or curtail research activities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Achleitner A-K, Lutz E (2005) First Chicago method: alternative approach to valuing innovative start-ups in the context of venture capital financing rounds. Betriebswirtsch Forsch Prax 57(4):333–347
Bana e Costa C, Thore S (2002) The many dimensions of an R&D project: multi-criteria analysis. In: Thore S (ed) Technology commercialization: DEA and related analytical methods for evaluating the use and implementation of technical innovation. Kluwer, Boston
Bandarian R (2007) Evaluation of commercial potential of a new technology at the early stage of development with fuzzy logic. J Technol Manag Innov 2(4):73–85
Berg S (2010) Water utility benchmarking: measurement, methodologies, and performance incentives. IWA, London
Chaston I (2010) Entrepreneurial management in small firms. Sage, London
Christensen CM, Kaufman SP, Shih WC (2008) Innovation killers. Harv Bus Rev 86(1):98–105
Cooper RG (2005) Product leadership. Pathways to profitable innovation. Basic Books, New York
Day GS (2007) Is it real? Can we win? Is it worth doing? Managing risk and reward in an innovation portfolio. Harv Bus Rev 85(12):110–120
Harvard Business Essentials (2005) Zarządzanie kreatywnością i innowacją. MT Biznes, Warszawa
Heidenberger K, Stummer C (1999) Research development project selection and resources allocation: a review of quantitative modeling approaches. Int J Manag Rev 1(2):197–224
Mazurkiewicz A, Belina B, Giesko T, Karsznia W (2013) Operational system for the assessment of the implementation maturity level of technical innovations. Maint Probl 4:1–5
Mazzarol T (2011) Entrepreneurship and innovation. Tilde University Press, Prahran
Rostek K (2014) Modeling commercial potential of innovative projects. Int Rev Manag Bus Rev 3(1):77–95
Stawasz E, Stos D (2011) Selected aspects of the valuation of innovative undertakings. Oper Res Decis 3–4:57–68
Stawasz E, Głodek P, Stos D, Stos-Roman A (2013) Metody analizy potencjału wdrożeniowego i komercyjnego innowacyjnego produktu technicznego lub procesu technologicznego. Uniwersytet Łódzki, Lodz
Thomke S (2001) Enlightened experimentation: the new imperative for innovation. Harv Bus Rev 79(2):67–75
Thore SA (ed) (2002) Technology commercialization: DEA and related analytical methods for evaluating the use and implementation of technical innovation. Kluwer, Boston
Tidd J, Bessant J, Pavitt K (2005) Managing innovation: integrating technological, market and organizational change, 3rd edn. Wiley, Hoboken
Tritle GL, Scriven EFV, Fusfeld AR (2000) Resolving uncertainty in R&D portfolios. Res Technol Manag 43(6):47–55
Valderrama TG, Groot TLCM (2002) Controlling the efficiency of university research in the Netherlands. In: Thore S (ed) Technology commercialization: DEA and related analytical methods for evaluating the use and implementation of technical innovation. Kluwer, Boston
Wang J, Lin W, Huang Y-H (2010) A performance-oriented risk management framework for innovative R&D projects. Technovation 11–12:601–611
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Stawasz, E., Stos, D. (2016). Method of Simplified Evaluation of the Commercial Potential of R&D Projects. In: Dudycz, T., Osbert-Pociecha, G., Brycz, B. (eds) The Essence and Measurement of Organizational Efficiency. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21139-8_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21139-8_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21138-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-21139-8
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)