Skip to main content

Affective Semiosis: Philosophical Links to Cultural Psychology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Psychology as the Science of Human Being

Part of the book series: Annals of Theoretical Psychology ((AOTP,volume 13))

Abstract

The matrices and forms of meaning-making are the shared focal concerns of a philosophical semiotics and of a cultural psychology informed by broad-based semiotic categories. C. S. Peirce’s analysis of sign processes is a fine point of entry into a reflection on their main points of intersection. However, the centrality of the notion of quality or firstness in Peirce’s model of semiosis leads to a reflection on the universality of feeling and of being affected by objective forms that emerge at the thresholds of sense. Phenomenology’s engagement with the primacy of form over explicit meaning, foregrounded by Merleau-Ponty, points toward new ways of foregrounding affectivity as a universal mode of sense-making and is complemented and extended by Susanne Langer’s development of a revised notion of feeling and by John Dewey’s extension of Peirce’s theory of quality into a core principle of a reformed pragmatist account of the multi-dimensional organism-environment relation, a prime concern of cultural psychology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See my ‘Peirce’s Categories and Langer’s Aesthetics: On Dividing the Semiotic Continuum’ (2013) and my Susanne Langer in Focus: The Symbolic Mind (2009).

References

  • Cassirer, E. (1929). The phenomenology of knowledge. Vol. III of the philosophy of symbolic forms (R. Manheim, Trans.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press (German original 1929).

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. (2000). The feeling of what happens. New York: Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey et al. (1964). A philosophical correspondence 1932–1951. In S. Ratner, J. Altman & E. James (Eds.), Wheeler as associate editor. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1931a). Affective thought. In J. Dewey (Ed.), Philosophy and civilization. New York: Putnam’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1931b). Qualitative thought. In L. Hickman & A. Thomas (Eds.), The essential dewey, (Vol. 1). Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. Carbondale, Il: Southern Illinois University Press, (critical annotated edition).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1935). Peirce’s theory of quality. In L. Hickman & Thomas Alexander (Eds.), The essential dewey (Vol. 2). Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houser, N., & Christian, K. (Eds.). (1992). The essential peirce: Selected philosophical writings, (Vol. 1) (pp. 1867–1893). Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innis, R. E. (1994). Consciousness and the play of signs. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innis, R. E. (2002). Pragmatism and the forms of sense: Language, perception, technics. University Park: Penn State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innis, R. E. (2009). Susanne langer in focus: The symbolic mind. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innis, R. E. (2012). Meaningful connections: Semiotics, cultural psychology, and the forms of sense. In J. Valsiner (Ed.), The oxford handbook of culture and psychology (pp. 255–276). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innis, R. E. (2013). Peirce’s categories and Langer’s aesthetics: On dividing the semiotic continuum. In Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia, Vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 35–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innis, R. E. (2014). On not beating one’s wings in the void: Linking contexts of meaning-making. In B. Wagoner, N. Chaudhary, & P. Hviid (Eds.), Cultural psychology and its future: Complementarity in a new key, charlotte. NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köhler, W. (1947). Gestalt psychology: An introduction to new concepts in modern psychology. New York: New American Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, S. K. (1930). The practice of philosophy. New York: Holt. Cited as PP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, S. K. (1942). Philosophy in a new key: A study in the symbolism of reason, rite, and art. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (3rd edition with new preface by the author, 1957. Cited in text as PNK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, S. K. (1953). Feeling and form: A theory of art developed from philosophy in a new key. Cited in text as FF: Scribner’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, S. K. (1967). Mind: An essay on human feeling (Vol. 1). Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press. Cited in text as M-I.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, S. K. (1972). Mind: An essay on human feeling (Vol. II). Baltimore, Md: Johns Hopkins University Press. Cited in text as M-II.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, S. K. (1982). Mind: An essay on human feeling (Vol. 3). Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press. Cited in text as M-III.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1942). The structure of behavior (A. F. Fisher, Trans.). Foreword by J. Wild. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phenomenology of perception. (C. Smith, Trans.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). The visible and the invisible (C. Lefort & A. Lingis, Trans.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1868a). Questions concerning certain capacities claimed for man. In The essential peirce (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1868b). Some consequences of four incapacities. In The essential peirce (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1891a). The architecture of theories. In Houser and Kloesel 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1891b). Review of James’s principles of psychology. In CP 8.55–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1931–58). The collected papers of Charles sanders Peirce, eds. In C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss (Vols. 1–6) and A. Burks (Vols. 7–8). Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press (Cited in text as CP).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1992–94). The essential peirce, eds. N. Houser & C. Kloesel (Vol. 1) and the Peirce Edition Project (Vol. 2), (Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge: Toward a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert E. Innis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Innis, R.E. (2016). Affective Semiosis: Philosophical Links to Cultural Psychology. In: Valsiner, J., Marsico, G., Chaudhary, N., Sato, T., Dazzani, V. (eds) Psychology as the Science of Human Being. Annals of Theoretical Psychology, vol 13. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21094-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics