Skip to main content

Psychology as a Normative Science

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Psychology as the Science of Human Being

Part of the book series: Annals of Theoretical Psychology ((AOTP,volume 13))

Abstract

This chapter makes two foundational claims about psychological phenomena and uses these to articulate three conclusions. The claims are in short that psychological phenomena, at least in their developed human manifestations, should be seen as (1) doings that are (2) conversational. This approach is traced to Aristotle and reflected in Arendt’s work of the distinction between life as zoe (biological life) and bios (mental life). I argue that we need to conclude that, as a study of mental life, a causal vocabulary is inappropriate in psychology; the normativity of psychology is embedded in cultural practices; and finally that psychology is and ought to be a normative science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. (This edition 1998). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (1976). Nichomachean ethics. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, M. R., & Hacker, P. M. S. (2003). Philosophical foundations of neuroscience. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkmann, S. (2011a). Psychology as a moral science: Perspectives on normativity. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brinkmann, S. (2011b). Towards an expansive hybrid psychology: Integrating theories of the mediated mind. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 45, 1–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action and cognitive extension. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Costall, A. (2004). From direct perception to the primacy of action: A closer look at James Gibson’s ecological approach to psychology. In G. Bremmer & A. Slater (Eds.), Theories of infant development. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (1997). Naming the mind: How psychology found its language. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. (This edition published 1966). New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1922). Human nature and conduct: An introduction to social psychology. (This edition published 1930). New York: The Modern Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. (First published 1979). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I. (1995). Rewriting the soul. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HarrĂ©, R. (1983). Personal being. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • HarrĂ©, R. (2002). Cognitive science: A philosophical introduction. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • HarrĂ©, R., & Moghaddam, F. M. (2012). Psychology for the third millenium: Integrating cultural and neuroscience perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holiday, A. (1988). Moral powers: Normative necessity in language and history. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kierkegaard, S. A. (1849). Sygdommen til døden [The sickness unto death]. (This edition 1995). Copenhagen: Gyldendal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kofod, E. H. (2013). Grief: From morality to pathology. In preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Løgstrup, K. E. (1956). The ethical demand. (This edition published 1997). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1985a). After virtue. (2nd ed. with postscript). London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1985b). How psychology makes itself true—or false. In Koch, S. & Leary, D. E. (Eds.), A century of psychology as science. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, B., & Tedlock, B. (1995). Introduction. In B. Tedlock & B. Mannheim (Eds.), The dialogic emergence of culture (pp. 1–32). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, E. (2007). Bipolar expeditions: Mania and depression in American culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulhall, S. (2007). The conversation of humanity. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. (1991). Life in quest of narrative. In D. Wood (Ed.), On Paul Ricoeur: Narrative and interpretation. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringer, A. (2013). Listening to patients: A study of illness discourses, patient identity, and user involvement in contemporary psychiatric practice. Roskilde University: PhD Dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, D. N. (1989). Aristotle’s psychology. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1999). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self (2nd ed.). London: Free Association Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. London: Hutchinson & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. (1992). The rediscovery of the mind. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellars, W. (1997). Empiricism and the philosophy of mind. (First published 1956). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shotter, J. (1993). Conversational realities: Constructing life through language. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. (1997). The Norton history of the human sciences. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1985). Self-interpreting animals. In Human agency and language: Philosophical papers 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J. (2007). Culture in minds and societies: Foundations of cultural psychology. New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. N. & Gantt, E. E. (2002). Pursuing psychology as science of the ethical: Contributions of the work of Emmanuel Levinas. In Gantt, E. E. & Williams, R. N. (Eds.), Psychology for the other: Levinas, ethics and the practice of psychology (pp. 1–31). Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Svend Brinkmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brinkmann, S. (2016). Psychology as a Normative Science. In: Valsiner, J., Marsico, G., Chaudhary, N., Sato, T., Dazzani, V. (eds) Psychology as the Science of Human Being. Annals of Theoretical Psychology, vol 13. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21094-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics