Skip to main content

Learning the Relationship Between Corporate Governance and Company Performance Using Data Mining

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Machine Learning and Data Mining in Pattern Recognition (MLDM 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9166))

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to identify the relationship between corporate governance variables and firm performance by employing data mining methods. We choose two dependent variables, Tobin’s Q ratio and Altman Z-score, as measures for the companies’ performances and apply machine learning techniques on the data collected from the components companies of three major stock indexes: S&P 500, STOXX Europe 600 and STOXX Eastern Europe 300. We use decision trees and logistic regressions as learning algorithms, and then we compare their performances. For the US components, we found a positive connection between the presence of women in the board and the company performance, while in Western Europe that it is better to employ a larger audit committee in order to lower the bankruptcy risk. An independent chairperson is a positive factor related to Altman Z-score, for the companies from Eastern Europe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Acharya, V.V., John, K., Sundaram, R.K.: On the optimality of resetting executive stock options. J. Financ. Econ. 57(1), 65–101 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Altman, E.I.: Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. J. Financ. 23(4), 589–609 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Altman, E.I., Saunders, A.: Credit risk measurement: developments over the last 20 years. J. Banking Financ. 21(11), 1721–1742 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Becker, B., Strömberg, P.: Fiduciary duties and equity-debtholder conflicts. Rev. Financ. Stud. 25(6), 1931–1969 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bhagat, S., Bolton, B.: Corporate governance and firm performance. J. Corp. Financ. 14(3), 257–273 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bolton, P., Chen, H., Wang, N.: A unified theory of tobin’s q, corporate investment, financing, and risk management. J. Financ. 66(5), 1545–1578 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brenner, M., Sundaram, R.K., Yermack, D.: Altering the terms of executive stock options. J. Financ. Econ. 57(1), 103–128 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bryan, D., Fernando, G.D., Tripathy, A.: Bankruptcy risk, productivity and firm strategy. Rev. Account. Financ. 12(4), 309–326 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chawla, N.V., Bowyer, K.W., Hall, L.O., Kegelmeyer, W.P.: Smote: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 16(1), 321–357 (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen, W., Xiang, G., Liu, Y., Wang, K.: Credit risk evaluation by hybrid data mining technique. Syst. Eng. Procedia 3, 194–200 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chung, K.H., Pruitt, S.W.: A simple approximation of Tobin’s q. Financ. Manage. 23, 70–74 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Claessens, S., Djankov, S.: Ownership concentration and corporate performance in the Czech Republic. J. Comp. Econ. 27(3), 498–513 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Claessens, S., Yurtoglu, B.B.: Corporate governance in emerging markets: a survey. Emerg. Mark. Rev. 15, 1–33 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Creamer, G., Freund, Y.: Learning a board balanced scorecard to improve corporate performance. Decis. Support Syst. 49(4), 365–385 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Creamer, G.G., Freund, Y.: Predicting performance and quantifying corporate governance risk for Latin American adrs and banks. In: Financial Engineering and Applications. MIT, Cambridge (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Daily, C.M., Dalton, D.R.: Bankruptcy and corporate governance: the impact of board composition and structure. Acad. Manage. J. 37(6), 1603–1617 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dybvig, P.H., Warachka, M.: Tobin’s q does not measure performance: theory, empirics, and alternative measures. Unpublished Working paper, Washington University, Saint Louis, United Sates (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Elloumi, F., Gueyie, J.P.: Financial distress and corporate governance: an empirical analysis. Corp. Governance Int. J. Bus. Soc. 1(1), 15–23 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fawcett, T.: An introduction to roc analysis. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 27(8), 861–874 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Fayyad, U., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., Smyth, P.: From data mining to knowledge discovery in databases. AL Mag. 17(3), 37 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Freund, Y., Mason, L.: The alternating decision tree learning algorithm. In: ICML. vol. 99, pp. 124–133 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Freund, Y., Schapire, R.E., et al.: Experiments with a new boosting algorithm. In: ICML, vol. 96, pp. 148–156 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gibson, M.S.: Is corporate governance ineffective in emerging markets? J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 38(01), 231–250 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Guest, P.M.: The impact of board size on firm performance: evidence from the UK. Eur. J. Financ. 15(4), 385–404 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., Witten, I.H.: The weka data mining software: an update. ACM SIGKDD Explor. Newslett. 11(1), 10–18 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hall, M.A., Holmes, G.: Benchmarking attribute selection techniques for discrete class data mining. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 15(6), 1437–1447 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hambrick, D.C., D’Aveni, R.A.: Top team deterioration as part of the downward spiral of large corporate bankruptcies. Manage. Sci. 38(10), 1445–1466 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Kirkby, R., Frank, E., Hall, M.: Multiclass alternating decision trees. In: Elomaa, T., Mannila, H., Toivonen, H. (eds.) ECML 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2430, pp. 161–172. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Kambal, E., Osman, I., Taha, M., Mohammed, N., Mohammed, S.: Credit scoring using data mining techniques with particular reference to sudanese banks. In: 2013 International Conference on Computing, Electrical and Electronics Engineering (ICCEEE), pp. 378–383. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kirkos, E., Spathis, C., Manolopoulos, Y.: Data mining techniques for the detection of fraudulent financial statements. Expert Syst. Appl. 32(4), 995–1003 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kohavi, R., et al.: A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. In: IJCAI 2014, pp. 1137–1145 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Landwehr, N., Hall, M., Frank, E.: Logistic Model Trees. In: Lavrač, N., Gamberger, D., Todorovski, L., Blockeel, H. (eds.) ECML 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2837, pp. 241–252. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Lang, L.H., Stulz, R.M.: Tobin’s q, corporate diversification and firm performance. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Li, H.X., Wang, Z.J., Deng, X.L.: Ownership, independent directors, agency costs and financial distress: evidence from chinese listed companies. Corp. Governance Int. J. Bus. Soc. 8(5), 622–636 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lu, Y.H., Tsai, C.F., Yen, D.C., et al.: Discovering important factors of intangible firm value by association rules. Int. J. Digital Account. Res. 10, 55–85 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lückerath-Rovers, M.: Women on boards and firm performance. J. Manage. Governance 17(2), 491–509 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Merton, R.C.: On the pricing of corporate debt: the risk structure of interest rates*. J. Financ. 29(2), 449–470 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ohlson, J.A.: Financial ratios and the probabilistic prediction of bankruptcy. J. Account. Res. 18(1), 109–131 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. Parker, S., Peters, G.F., Turetsky, H.F.: Corporate governance and corporate failure: a survival analysis. Corp. Governance Int. J. Bus. Soc. 2(2), 4–12 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Platt, H., Platt, M.: Corporate board attributes and bankruptcy. J. Bus. Res. 65(8), 1139–1143 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Quinlan, J.R.: C4. 5: Programs for Machine Learning. Elsevier, Burlington (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ravisankar, P., Ravi, V., Rao, G.R., Bose, I.: Detection of financial statement fraud and feature selection using data mining techniques. Decis. Support Syst. 50(2), 491–500 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ryan, H.E., Wiggins, R.A.: Who is in whose pocket? Director compensation, board independence, and barriers to effective monitoring. J. Financ. Econ. 73(3), 497–524 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Sumner, M., Frank, E., Hall, M.: Speeding up logistic model tree induction. In: Jorge, A.M., Torgo, L., Brazdil, P.B., Camacho, R., Gama, J. (eds.) PKDD 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3721, pp. 675–683. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  45. Tobin, J.: A general equilibrium approach to monetary theory. J. Money Credit Bank. 1(1), 15–29 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Tsai, C.F., Lu, Y.H., Yen, D.C.: Determinants of intangible assets value: the data mining approach. Knowl.-Based Syst. 31, 67–77 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was co financed from the European Social Fund through Sectoral Operational Program Human Resources Development 2007–2013, project number POSDRU/159/1.5/S/134197 and POSDRU/159/1.5/S/142115, Performance and excellence in doctoral and postdoctoral research in Romanian economics science domain” and from UEFISCDI under project JustASR - PN-II-PT-PCCA-2013-4-1644.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Darie Moldovan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix A

Appendix A

Variable

Description

Tax

Tax burden for the last 12 months

Interest

Interest burden for the last 12 months

Asset

Amount of sales or revenues generated per dollar of assets. The ratio is an indicator of the efficiency with which a company is deploying its assets

Fincl l

Financial leverage. Measures the average assets to average equity

Oper ROE

Normalized ROE. Returns on Common Equity based on net income excluding one-time charges

Dvd P/O

Dividend Payout Ratio. Fraction of net income a firm pays to its shareholders in dividends, in percentage

Board Size

Number of Directors on the company’s board

% Non Exec Dir on Bd

Percentage of the board of directors that is comprised of non-executive directors

% Indep Directors

Independent directors as a percentage of total board membership

CEO Duality

Indicates whether the company’s Chief Executive Officer is also Chairman of the Board, as reported by the company

Indep Chrprsn

Indicates whether the company chairperson was independent as of the fiscal year end

Indep Lead Dir

Indicates whether the company has an independent lead director within the board of directors

Frmr CEO or its Equiv on Bd

Indicates whether a former company chief executive officer (CEO) or person with equivalent role has been a director on the board

% Women on Board

Percentage of Women on the Board of Directors

Ind Dir Bd Mtg Att

Percentage of board meetings attended by independent directors

Unit or 2 Tier Bd Sys

Indicates whether the company’s board has a Unitary (1) or Two Tier (2) system. Marked 2 when board system has separate boards for Supervisory/Commissioner board and Management board

Prsdg Dir

Indicates whether the company has a presiding director in its board of directors

% Feml Execs Feml CEO or Equiv

Number of female executives, as a percentage of total executives. Indicates whether the company Chief Executive Officer (CEO) or equivalent is female

Age Young Dir

Age of the youngest director on the company board in years

BOD Age Rng

Age range of the members of the company board in years, calculated by subtracting the age of the youngest director on the company board from the age of the oldest director on the company board

Age Old Dir

Age of the oldest director on the company board in years

Bd Avg Age

Average age of the members of the board

Board Duration

Length of a board member’s term, in years

Board Mtgs #

Total number of corporate board meetings held in the past year

Exec Dir Bd Dur

Length of an executive director board member’s term, in years

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Moldovan, D., Mutu, S. (2015). Learning the Relationship Between Corporate Governance and Company Performance Using Data Mining. In: Perner, P. (eds) Machine Learning and Data Mining in Pattern Recognition. MLDM 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9166. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21024-7_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21024-7_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21023-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-21024-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics