Skip to main content

State of the Art Construction Based on the J48 Classifier: Case Study of Internet of Things

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 224))

Abstract

The bibliometric technics allow us to illustrate aspects of interpretation of data obtained through data bases that are focus in science spreading, which offers an aggregated value to researchers. In this article, we explore the importance of such obtained information from articles’ query; in this particular case study the Internet of Things (IoT). The obtained and preprocessed metadata is used to feed the decision tree classification (J48) algorythms, as a result of the training stage, we generated a decision tree/classification where the subjects of research are visualized within a four year time frame. The construction of this classification tree is based in entropy, thus, the order or disorder in which the subjects of research can be interpreted within a level of relevancy in the time frame mentioned. We conceived the visualization and interpretation as the state of the art for the subjects addressed for a particular case, which help researchers to infer tendencies within specific subjects of research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Arduini, D., Zanfei, A.: An overview of scholarly research on public e-services? a meta-analysis of the literature. Telecomm. Policy 38, 476–495 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2013.10.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Berendt, B., Krause, B., Kolbe-Nusser, S.: Intelligent scientific authoring tools: interactive data mining for constructive uses of citation networks. Inf. Process. Manag. 46, 1–10 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2009.08.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bornmann, L.: Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? an overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics. J. Informetr. 8, 895–903 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bornmann, L., Leydesdorff, L.: The validation of (advanced) bibliometric indicators through peer assessments: a comparative study using data from InCites and F1000. J. Informetr. 7, 286–291 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.joi.2012.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bouyssou, D., Marchant, T.: An axiomatic approach to bibliometric rankings and indices. J. Informetr. 8, 449–477 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.joi.2014.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bursa, M., Lhotska, L., Chudacek, V., et al.: Information retrieval from hospital information system: increasing effectivity using swarm intelligence. J. Appl. Log. (2014). doi:10.1016/j.jal.2014.11.006

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chakraborty, V., Chiu, V., Vasarhelyi, M.: Automatic classification of accounting literature. Int. J. Acc. Inf. Syst. 15, 122–148 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.accinf.2014.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chang, S.-B., Lai, K.-K., Chang, S.-M.: Exploring technology diffusion and classification of business methods: using the patent citation network. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 76, 107–117 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2008.03.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheng, B., Wang, M., Mørch, A.I., et al.: Research on e-learning in the workplace 2000–2012: a bibliometric analysis of the literature. Educ. Res. Rev. 11, 56–72 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2014.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cobo, M.J., Martínez, M.A., Gutiérrez-Salcedo, M., et al.: 25 years at knowledge-based systems: a bibliometric analysis. Knowl. Based Syst. (2015). doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2014.12.035

    Google Scholar 

  11. Coombes, P.H., Nicholson, J.D.: Business models and their relationship with marketing: a systematic literature review. Ind. Mark. Manag. 42, 656–664 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dias, G.P.: Bibliometric analysis of portuguese research in e-government. Procedia Technol. 16, 279–287 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.protcy.2014.10.093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ding, Y., Fu, X.: The research of text mining based on self-organizing maps. Procedia Eng. 29, 537–541 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2011.12.757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Essendorfer, S., Diaz-Rainey, I., Falta, M.: Creative destruction in wall street’s technological arms race: evidence from patent data. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change (2015). doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2014.11.012

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fahimnia, B., Sarkis, J., Davarzani, H.: Green supply chain management: a review and bibliometric analysis. Int. J. Prod. Econ. (2015). doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.01.003

    Google Scholar 

  16. Feng, F., Zhang, L., Du, Y., Wang, W.: Visualization and quantitative study in bibliographic databases: a case in the field of university–industry cooperation. J. Informetr. 9, 118–134 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.joi.2014.11.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ferenhof, H.A., Vignochi, L., Selig, P.M., et al.: Environmental management systems in small and medium-sized enterprises: an analysis and systematic review. J. Clean. Prod. 74, 44–53 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ferreira, M.P., Santos, J.C., de Almeida, M.I.R., Reis, N.R.: Mergers & acquisitions research: a bibliometric study of top strategy and international business journals, 1980–2010. J. Bus. Res. 67, 2550–2558 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.03.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Franceschet, M., Costantini, A.: The first Italian research assessment exercise: a bibliometric perspective. J. Informetr. 5, 275–291 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.joi.2010.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Franceschini, F., Maisano, D., Mastrogiacomo, L.: Scientific journal publishers and omitted citations in bibliometric databases: any relationship? J. Informetr. 8, 751–765 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.joi.2014.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Furukawa, T., Mori, K., Arino, K., et al.: Identifying the evolutionary process of emerging technologies: a chronological network analysis of world wide web conference sessions. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change. 91, 280–294 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2014.03.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Glenisson, P., Glänzel, W., Janssens, F., De, M.B.: Combining full text and bibliometric information in mapping scientific disciplines. Inf. Process. Manag. 41, 1548–1572 (2005). doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2005.03.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. He, W.: Examining students online interaction in a live video streaming environment using data mining and text mining. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29, 90–102 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. He, W.: Improving user experience with case-based reasoning systems using text mining and Web 2.0. Expert Syst. Appl. 40, 500–507 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.07.070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Huang, L., Zhang, Y., Guo, Y., et al.: Four dimensional science and technology planning: a new approach based on bibliometrics and technology roadmapping. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 81, 39–48 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2012.09.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Huggett, S.: Journal bibliometrics indicators and citation ethics: a discussion of current issues. Atherosclerosis 230, 275–277 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.07.051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Janssens, F., Leta, J., Glänzel, W., De, M.B.: Towards mapping library and information science. Inf. Process. Manag. 42, 1614–1642 (2006). doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2006.03.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jung, J.J.: Knowledge distribution via shared context between blog-based knowledge management systems: a case study of collaborative tagging. Expert Syst. Appl. 36, 10627–10633 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2009.02.052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kostoff, R.N., Tshiteya, R., Pfeil, K.M., Humenik, J.A.: Electrochemical power text mining using bibliometrics and database tomography. J. Power Sources 110, 163–176 (2002). doi:10.1016/S0378-7753(02)00233-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee, C.-Y., Lee, Z.-J.: A novel algorithm applied to classify unbalanced data. Appl. Soft Comput. 12, 2481–2485 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2012.03.051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Leydesdorff, L., Bornmann, L., Marx, W., Milojević, S.: Referenced publication years spectroscopy applied to iMetrics: scientometrics, journal of informetrics, and a relevant subset of JASIST. J. Informetr. 8, 162–174 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.joi.2013.11.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Li, W., Zhao, Y.: Bibliometric analysis of global environmental assessment research in a 20-year period. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 50, 158–166 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2014.09.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lipitakis, A.D, Lipitakis, E.A.E.C.: On machine learning with imbalanced data and research quality evaluation methodologies. In: International Conference Computer Science and Computer Intelligence (CSCI) 2014, pp. 451–457 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  34. López, V., Triguero, I., Carmona, C.J., et al.: Addressing imbalanced classification with instance generation techniques: IPADE-ID. Neurocomputing 126, 15–28 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2013.01.050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mabe, M., Ware, M.: The STM report: an overview of scientific and scholarly journals publishing. STM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Martín-Valdivia, M.T., Díaz-Galiano, M.C., Montejo-Raez, A., Ureña-López, L.A.: Using information gain to improve multi-modal information retrieval systems. Inf. Process. Manag. 44, 1146–1158 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2007.09.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. McNay, I.: Research quality assessment. In: McGaw, P.P.B. (ed.) International Encyclopedia of Education, 3rd edn, pp. 307–315. Elsevier, Oxford (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  38. Mullins, M.E.: Has the time come for bibliometrics and the h-index in academic radiology? Acad. Radiol. 17, 815–816 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.acra.2010.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Nicholson, S.: The basis for bibliomining: Frameworks for bringing together usage-based data mining and bibliometrics through data warehousing in digital library services. Inf. Process. Manag. 42, 785–804 (2006). doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2005.05.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ortega, J.L.: Relationship between altmetric and bibliometric indicators across academic social sites: the case of CSIC’s members. J. Informetr. 9, 39–49 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.joi.2014.11.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Parvin, H., MirnabiBaboli, M., Alinejad-Rokny, H.: Proposing a classifier ensemble framework based on classifier selection and decision tree. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 37, 34–42 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2014.08.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Rafols, I., Leydesdorff, L., O’Hare, A., et al.: How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: a comparison between innovation studies and business & management. Res. Policy 41, 1262–1282 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Setsirichok, D., Piroonratana, T., Wongseree, W., et al.: Classification of complete blood count and haemoglobin typing data by a C4.5 decision tree, a naïve bayes classifier and a multilayer perceptron for thalassaemia screening. Biomed. Signal Process. Control 7, 202–212 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2011.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Setti, G.: Bibliometric indicators: why do we need more than one? IEEE Access 1, 232–246 (2013). doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2013.2261115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Shu, B., Kak, S.: A neural network-based intelligent metasearch engine. Inf. Sci. (Ny) 120, 1–11 (1999). doi:10.1016/S0020-0255(99)00062-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Taha, K.: Extracting various classes of data from biological text using the concept of existence dependency. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Info. 1, 1–15 (2015). doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2015.2392786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Triguero, I., Peralta, D., Bacardit, J., et al.: MRPR: a MapReduce solution for prototype reduction in big data classification. Neurocomputing 150, 331–345 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2014.04.078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Tsai, H.-H.: Global data mining: an empirical study of current trends, future forecasts and technology diffusions. Expert Syst. Appl. 39, 8172–8181 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Tsai, M.-F., Wang, C.-J.: Post-modern portfolio theory for information retrieval. Procedia Comput. Sci. 13, 80–85 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.procs.2012.09.116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Vassilakaki, E., Garoufallou, E.: Multilingual digital libraries: a review of issues in system-centered and user-centered studies, information retrieval and user behavior. Int. Inf. Libr. Rev. 45, 3–19 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.iilr.2013.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Vieira, E.S., Cabral, J.A.S., Gomes, J.A.N.F.: How good is a model based on bibliometric indicators in predicting the final decisions made by peers? J. Informetr. 8, 390–405 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.joi.2014.01.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Wagner, C.S., Roessner, J.D., Bobb, K., et al.: Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): a review of the literature. J. Informetr. 5, 14–26 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.joi.2010.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Wang, B., Chai, K.-H., Subramanian, A.M.: Roots and development of intellectual property management research: a bibliometric review. World Pat. Inf. (2015). doi:10.1016/j.wpi.2014.12.002

    Google Scholar 

  54. Xie, X., Bai, Q., Hou, L., Wu, X.: Study and application of semantic-based image retrieval. J. China Univ. Posts Telecommun. 20, 136–142 (2013). doi:10.1016/S1005-8885(13)60209-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Xu, Z., Li, P., Wang, Y.: Text classifier based on an improved SVM decision tree. Phys. Procedia 33, 1986–1991 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.phpro.2012.05.312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Yan, E.: Research dynamics: measuring the continuity and popularity of research topics. J. Informetr. 8, 98–110 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.joi.2013.10.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Dorronsoro, B., Ruiz, P., Danoy, G., et al.: Evolutionary Algorithms for Mobile Ad hoc Networks. Nature Inspired Computing Series. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken (2014). doi:10.1002/9781118833209. To appear

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luz Andrea Rodriguez Rojas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Anzola Anzola, J.P., Rojas, L.A.R., Tarazona Bermudez, G.M. (2015). State of the Art Construction Based on the J48 Classifier: Case Study of Internet of Things. In: Uden, L., Heričko, M., Ting, IH. (eds) Knowledge Management in Organizations. KMO 2015. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 224. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21009-4_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21009-4_36

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21008-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-21009-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics