Abstract
This research is a case study research that is trying to solve the problem of task conflict that arises within project teams among university students. The research tests the relationship between knowledge sharing climate within the university and conflict resolution styles. This research used interviews with 10 students to explore the research questions and another interview with the head of the quality assurance department in the university that is responsible about the quality of the educational process in the university. Some indicators on the need for such research were collected through the documentation of the university records which was published on its website. A survey also of 102 students revealed that there is positive relationship between the knowledge sharing climate and the middle and high levels of collaboration and assertiveness in solving task conflicts that arise among students’ team members. Avoidance which represents the lowest assertive and the lowest collaborative conflict solution is not related to the knowledge sharing climate at all in this research. This reflects that avoidance may lead to lack of learning unless it is related to dysfunctional conflicts. The research is an exploratory study for predicting the levels of collaboration and assertiveness in conflict resolution styles by the student’s perception of knowledge sharing culture.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Boros, S., Meslec, N., Cursue, P., Emons, W.: Struggles for cooperation: conflict resolution strategies in multicultural groups. J. Manag. Psychol. 25(5), 539–554 (2010)
Gupta, K.: A comparative analysis of knowledge sharing climate. Knowl. Process Manag. 15(3), 186–195 (2008)
Han, G., Harms, B.: Team identification, trust, and conflict: a mediation model. J. Confl. Manag. 21, 20–43 (2010)
Hooff, B., Ridder, J.: Knowledge sharing in context: the influence of organizational commitment, communication climate and CMC use on knowledge sharing. J. Knowl. Manag. 8(6), 117–130 (2004)
Jehn, K.A.: A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Adm. Sci. Q. 42, 530–557 (1997)
Leung, A.S.: Interpersonal conflict and resolution strategies: an examination of Hong Kong employees. Team Perform. Manag. 14(3/4), 165–178 (2008)
Lewicki, R.J., McAllister, D.J., Bies Bunker, R.J.: Trust and distrust: new relationships and realities. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23(3), 438–458 (1998) http://www.jstor.org/stable/259288
Lin, H.: Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: an empirical study. Int. J. Manpower 28(¾), 315–332 (2007)
Lu, L., Zhou, F., Leung, K.: Effects of task and relationship conflicts on individual work behaviors. Int. J. Confl. Manag. 22, 131–150 (2011)
Rousseau, D.M.: Why workers identify with organizations. J. Organ. Behav. 19(3), 217--233 (1998)
Thomas, K.W., Kilmann, R.H.: The Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument. XICOM Inc., Tuxedo (1974)
Yesilbas, L., Lombard, R.: Specification of a repository to support collaborative knowledge exchange in IPPOP project. Comput. Ind. 75, 690–710 (2006)
Yesilbas, L., Lombard, M.: Towards a knowledge repository for collaborative design: focus on conflict management. Comput. Ind. 55, 335–350 (2004)
http://academic.engr.arizona.edu/vjohnson/ConflictManagementQuestionnaire/CMQResults.asp
http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=879oL5LeM4vIkgOT8gx%2bZw%3d%3d–knowledge sharing questionnaire
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Samra, R.A., Shaalan, K. (2015). The Relationship Between Knowledge Sharing Climate and Conflict Resolution Styles. In: Uden, L., Heričko, M., Ting, IH. (eds) Knowledge Management in Organizations. KMO 2015. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 224. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21009-4_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21009-4_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21008-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-21009-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)