Skip to main content

Shear Strength of Siliciclastic Sediments from Passive and Active Margins (0–100 m Below Seafloor): Insights into Seismic Strengthening

  • Chapter
Submarine Mass Movements and their Consequences

Part of the book series: Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research ((NTHR,volume 41))

Abstract

Submarine geohazards threaten coastal communities and global economies. Submarine debris flows are the largest mass-wasting events observed on the Earth’s surface, comprising of up to 50 % of basin fill. Further insight can be gained into these important processes by understanding in-situ preconditioning factors that lead to slope destabilization. We examine two locations from the International Ocean Discovery Program data archive to determine how external effects on sediment properties compare between passive margins and active margins. We select representative passive margin (Amazon Fan) and active margin sites (Nankai Trough), and analyse peak shear strength, void ratio, and composition from the uppermost 100 m below seafloor. This depth corresponds to a depth range in which most submarine mass movements originate. However, it is not appropriate to directly compare shear strength and void ratio of samples from different settings due to differing stress histories, sedimentary composition, and consolidation properties. We focus on ideal locations on both margin types that have solely undergone one-dimensional burial, no diagenesis/cementation, and no unroofing. We find that active margin sediments exhibit an increase in shear strength when compared to their passive margin counterparts, while void ratio tends to be higher on active margins. We are currently conducting a focused lab program to better understand compositional effects and determine the intrinsic properties of each site to more definitively normalize the in-situ sediment profiles. Our results suggest a potential link between shear strength and margin seismicity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Boulanger E (1999) Cyclic behavior of sediments of the continental margin of the Eel River: a possible explanation for the small superficial submarine landslides in this Region. University of Laval, Quebec, Quebec City, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson R (1958) The progress of consolidation in a clay layer increasing in thickness with time. Geotechnique 8(4):171–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hampton MA (1996) Submarine landslides. Rev Geophys 34(1):33–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambe TW, Whitman RV (1969) Soil mechanics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee HJ, Locat J, Boulanger E, Konrad JM (2004) Seismic strengthening, a conditioning factor influencing submarine lanslide development. Paper presented at the 57th Canadian Geotechnical Conference; 5th Joint CGS/IAH-CNC Conference, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada, October 24–27, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • Locat J, Lee H, Kayen R, Israel K, Savoie M-C, Boulanger É (2002) Shear strength development with burial in Eel River margin slope sediments. Mar Georesour Geotechnol 20(2):111–135. doi:10.1080/03608860290051 831

  • McAdoo BG, Pratson LF, Orange DL (2000) Submarine landslide geomorphology, US continental slope. Mar Geol 169(1–2):103–136, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0025-3227(00)00050-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAdoo BG, Capone MK, Minder J (2004) Seafloor geomorphology of convergent margins: implications for Cascadia seismic hazard. Tectonics 23(6):TC6008. doi:10.1029/2003TC001570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moscardelli LG (2007) Mass transport processes and deposits in offshore Trinidad and Venezuela, and their role in continental margin development. Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin

    Google Scholar 

  • Skempton AW (1970) The consolidation of clays by gravitational compaction. Q J Geol Soc Lond 125, Part 3. Geological Society of London, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the pioneering investigations into seismic strengthening, helping lay the foundation for this research, and the helpful comments and insights provided by Homa Lee and Jacques Locat.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joshua R. DeVore .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

DeVore, J.R., Sawyer, D.E. (2016). Shear Strength of Siliciclastic Sediments from Passive and Active Margins (0–100 m Below Seafloor): Insights into Seismic Strengthening. In: Lamarche, G., et al. Submarine Mass Movements and their Consequences. Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research, vol 41. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20979-1_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics