Advertisement

Introduction

  • Derek FranceEmail author
  • W. Brian Whalley
  • Alice Mauchline
  • Victoria Powell
  • Katharine Welsh
  • Alex Lerczak
  • Julian Park
  • Robert Bednarz
Chapter
  • 549 Downloads
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Ecology book series (BRIEFSECOLOGY)

Abstract

This Chapter introduces the concept of fieldwork and the literature promoting the value of integrating mobile technologies into fieldwork practice. We discuss the pedagogic reasons for incorporating technology into fieldwork and promote the concept of Personal Learning Environments (PLE s) for students as a framework for education, with the “tablet” computer (loaded with appropriate apps) enhancing the student’s personal learning experience.

Keywords

Fieldwork Mobile device Personal learning environment Pedagogy Technology-enhanced learning 

References

  1. Andrews J, Kneale P, Sougnez W, Stewart M, Stott T (2003) Carrying out pedagogic research into the constructive alignment of fieldwork. Planet Spec Ed 5:51–52. Retrieved from http://78.158.56.101/archive/gees/pubs/planet/pse5back3.pdf
  2. Beddall-Hill NL, Jabbar A, Al Shehri S (2011) Social mobile devices as tools for qualitative research in education: iPhones and iPads in ethnography, interviewing and design-based research. J Res Cent Educ Technol 7(1):67–89Google Scholar
  3. Beetham H (2013) Designing for active learning in technology-rich contexts. In: Beetham H, Sharpe R (eds) Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age. Routledge, New York, pp 31–48Google Scholar
  4. Campbell SW (2006) Perceptions of mobile phones in college classrooms: ringing, cheating and classroom policies. Commun Educ 55(3):280–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caudill JG (2010) A futurist perspective on mobile learning. In: Guy R (ed) Mobile learning: pilot projects and initiatives. Informing Science Press, Santa Rosa, pp 253–271Google Scholar
  6. Christensen CM, Horn MB, Johnson CW (2008) Disrupting class: how disruptive innovation will change the way the world learns. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Cotton DRE, Cotton PA (2009) Field biology experiences of undergraduate students: the impact of novelty space. J Biol Educ 43(4):169–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cochrane T, Bateman R (2010) Smartphones give you wings: pedagogical affordances of mobile Web 2.0. Australas J Education Tech 26(1):1–14Google Scholar
  9. Easton E, Gilburn A (2012) The field course effect: gains in cognitive learning in undergraduate biology students following a field course. J Biol Educ 46(1):29–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. France D, Ribchester C (2004) Producing websites for assessment: a case study from a level 1 fieldwork module. J Geogr High Educ 28:49–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. France D, Whalley WB, Mauchline A (2013) Using mobile devices to enhance undergraduate field research. CUR Q 34(2):38–42. Council on Undergraduate Research, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  12. Fuller IC, Edmondson S, France D, Higgitt D, Ratinen I (2006) International perspectives on the effectiveness of geography fieldwork for learning. J Geogr High Educ 30:89–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gamarra JGP, Ironside JE, de Vere N, Allainguillaume J, Wilkinson MJ (2010) Research-based residential fieldwork learning: double bonus? Biosci Educ 16(6). Available at http://journals.heacademy.ac.uk/doi/pdf/10.3108/beej.16.6
  14. Goulder R, Scott GW, Scott LJ (2012) Students’ perceptions of biology fieldwork: the example of students undertaking a preliminary year at a UK university. Int J Sci Educ 1:22Google Scholar
  15. Guy R (2010) Mobile learning defined. In: Guy R (ed) Mobile learning: pilot projects and initiatives. Informing Science Press, Santa Rosa, pp 1–7Google Scholar
  16. Healey M, Jenkins A (2000) Kolb’s experiential learning theory and its application in geography in higher education. J Geogr 99:185–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hovorka AJ, Wolf PA (2009) Activating the classroom: geographical fieldwork as pedagogical practice. J Geogr High Educ 33:89–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. ipadsinHE (2014) International conference on the use of iPads in higher education. Retrieved from http://www.ipadsinhe.org
  19. Jarvis C, Dickie J (2010) Podcasts in support of experiential field learning. J Geogr High Educ 34:173–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Johnson L, Adams Becker S, Cummins M, Estrada V, Freeman A, Ludgate H (2013) NMC horizon report 2013: higher education edition. The New Media Consortium, AustinGoogle Scholar
  21. Katz JE (2005) Mobile phones in educational settings. In: Nyiri K (ed) A sense of place: the global and the local in mobile communication. Passagen, Vienna, pp 305–317Google Scholar
  22. Keeton MT, Tate PJ (eds) (1978) Learning by experience—what, why, how. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  23. Kern EL, Carpenter JR (1984) Enhancement of student values, interests and attitudes in Earth Science through a field-oriented approach. J Geol Educ 32(5)Google Scholar
  24. Kern EL, Carpenter JR (1986) Effect of field activities on student learning. J Geol Educ 34:180–183Google Scholar
  25. Knight J (2006) Investigating geography undergraduates’ attitudes to teaching, learning, and technology. Planet 19:19–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kolb DA (1984) Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  27. Koole ML (2009) A model for framing mobile learning. In: Ally M (ed) Mobile learning: transforming the delivery of education and training. AU Press, Canada, pp 25–47Google Scholar
  28. Mac Callum K, Jeffrey L (2010) Resistance to the inclusion of mobile tools in the classroom: the impact of attitudes and variables on the adoption of mobile learning. In: Guy R (ed) Mobile learning: pilot projects and initiatives. Informing Science Press, Santa Rosa, pp 9–26Google Scholar
  29. Martin F, Ertzberger J (2013) Here and now mobile learning: an experimental study on the use of mobile technology. Comput Educ 68:76–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Maskall J, Stokes A (2008) Designing effective fieldwork for the environmental and natural sciences. In: GEES Teaching and Learning Guide. HE Academy Subject Centre for Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, PlymouthGoogle Scholar
  31. Masrom M, Ismail Z (2010) Benefits and barriers to the use of mobile learning in education: review of literature. In: Guy R (ed) Mobile learning: pilot projects and initiatives. Informing Science Press, Santa Rosa, pp 9–26Google Scholar
  32. Mehigan TJ, Pitt I (2010) Towards an ubiquitous future: modeling existing mobile learning system research. In: Guy R (ed) Mobile learning: pilot projects and initiatives. Informing Science Press, Santa Rosa, pp 273–290Google Scholar
  33. Melhuish M, Falloon G (2010) Looking to the future: m-learning with the iPad. Comput NZ Schools Learn Lend Technol 22(3):1–16Google Scholar
  34. Parr DM, Trexler CJ (2011) Students’ experiential learning and use of student farms in sustainable agriculture education. J Nat Res Life Sci Educ 40:172–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Peacock J, Park JR, Mauchline AL (2011) Effective learning in the life sciences: fieldwork. In: Adams D (ed) Effective learning in the life sciences. Wiley, Chichester, pp 65–90. ISBN 9780470661567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Prokop P, Tuncer G, Kvasničák R (2007) Short-term effects of field programme on students’ knowledge and attitude toward biology: a Slovak experience. J Sci Educ Technol 16(3):247–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rickinson M, Dillon J, Teamey K, Morris M, Choi MY, Sanders D, Benefield P (2004) A review of research on outdoor learning, vol 87. FSC occasional publicationGoogle Scholar
  38. Scott GW, Goulder R, Wheeler P, Scott LJ, Tobin ML, Marsham S (2012) The value of fieldwork in life and environmental sciences in the context of higher education: a case study in learning about biodiversity. J Sci Educ Technol 21:11–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shih Y, Mills D (2007) Setting the new standard with mobile computing in online learning. Int Rev Res Open Distance Learn 8(2):17Google Scholar
  40. Swansborough S, Turner D, Lynch K (2007) Active learning approaches to develop skills for sustainability. In: Roberts C, Roberts J (eds) Greener by degrees: exploring sustainability through higher education curriculyes, afraid sola. Geography Discipline Network, University of Gloucestershire, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  41. Stokes A, Boyle AP (2009) The undergraduate geoscience fieldwork experience: influencing factors and implications for learning. In: Whitmeyer SJ, Mogk DW, Pyle EJ (eds) Field geology education: historical perspectives and modern approaches, vol. 461. Geological SocAmer Inc, Boulder, pp 291–311Google Scholar
  42. Traxler J, Wishart J (eds) (2011) Making mobile learning work: case studies of practice. ESCalate HEA Subject Centre for Education, BristolGoogle Scholar
  43. Wei R, Leung L (1999) Blurring public and private behaviors in public space: policy challenges in the use of improper use of the cell phone. Telematics Inform 16:11–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Weiser M (1991) The computer for the 21st century. Sci Am 265(3):66–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Welsh KE, Mauchline AL, Park JR, Whalley WB, France D (2013) Enhancing fieldwork learning with technology: practitioner’s perspectives. J Geogr High Educ 37(3):1–17Google Scholar
  46. Whalley BW, France D, Park JR, Mauchline AL, Powell V, Welsh K (2014) iPad use in fieldwork: formal and informal use to enhance pedagogical practice in a bring your own technology world. In: Souleles N, Pillar C (eds) Proceedings of the first international conference on the use of iPads in higher education, Paphos. www.ipadsinhe.org. 20–22 Mar 2014. ISBN: 978-9963-697-10-6
  47. Wheeler A, Young C, Oliver K, Smith J (2011) Study skills enhancement through geography and environmental fieldwork. Planet 24:14–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Woodcock B, Middleton A, Nortcliffe A (2012) Considering the smartphone learner: an investigation into student interest in the use of personal technology to enhance their learning. Stud Engagem Exp J 1(1):1–15Google Scholar
  49. Zabala JS (2005) Ready, SETT, go! getting started with the SETT framework. Closing Gap 23(6):1–3Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Derek France
    • 1
    Email author
  • W. Brian Whalley
    • 2
  • Alice Mauchline
    • 3
  • Victoria Powell
    • 1
  • Katharine Welsh
    • 1
  • Alex Lerczak
    • 1
  • Julian Park
    • 3
  • Robert Bednarz
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Geography and International DevelopmentUniversity of ChesterChesterUK
  2. 2.Department of GeographyUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
  3. 3.School of Agriculture, Policy and DevelopmentUniversity of ReadingReadingUK
  4. 4.Department of GeographyTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations