Abstract
This chapter presents a framework for the characterization and evaluation of the implementation and development of an emerging technology from a networks approach. Through an analysis of technical-economic networks and an analysis of social networks, a study of the development of microtechnologies in Mexico around scientific, technical and market poles can be performed. Emerging technologies in this country, around which various actors have mobilized along the different stages of installation and development. The results in this study allow us to identify heterogeneous actors within the various collaboration network configurations in the different development poles (scientific, technical and market poles) of these emerging technologies in Mexico. Likewise, it offers some elements that allow us to consider the dynamics of the characterized networks. The proposed framework of analysis in this work can be replicated in other cases of technological development, if and when care is taken with methodological issues and theoretical.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Albornoz, M., & Fernández, P. E. (1996). Indicadores de ciencia y tecnología Iberoamericanos/Interamericanos. Revista Hispana para el Análisis de redes Sociales, 3(7), 193–215.
Arellano, A. (2010). Mapeando las redes de investigación tecnocientífica de la Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México. In A. Arellano (Ed.), Tramas de redes sociotécnicas: Conocimiento, técnica y sociedad en México (pp. 221–247). México: UAEM y Porrua.
Callon, M. (1989). La science et ses réseaux: Genèse et circulation des faits scientifiques. Paris: La découverte.
Callon, M. (1992). Sociologie des sciences et Economie du changement technique: l’irrésistible montée des réseaux technico-économiques. In B. Latour (Ed.), Ces réseaux que la raison ignore (pp. 53–78). Paris: L’Harmattan.
Callon, M. (1995). Algunos elementos para una sociología de la traducción. La domesticación de las vieiras en la bahía de Saint Brieuc. In J. M. Iranzo, J. R. Blanco, T. Gonzales de la Fe, C. Torres, & A. Cotillo (Eds.), Sociología de la ciencia y la tecnología (pp. 259–282). Madrid: CSIC.
Callon, M., Laredo, P., & Rabeharisoa, V. (1991). Gestion des programmes publics et réseaux technico-économiques. In D. Vinck (Ed.), Gestion de la recherche: Nouveaux problèmes, nouveaux outils (pp. 280–307). Bruxelles: De Boeck.
FUMEC (2006). Reporte de actividades 2004–2005. http://www.fumec.org.mx. Accessed 10 Feb 2013.
Gad-el-Hak, M. (2001). The MEMS Handbook. CRC Press, p. 1368.
Gomez, M. C. (2004, January 26). Costará 18 mdd el laboratorio nacional de nanotecnológica. La Jornada. http://www.jornada.unam.mx/2004/01/26/037n1soc.php?origen=soc-jus.php&fly=2. Accessed 10 Feb 2013.
Grossetti, M. (2007). Reflexiones en torno a la noción de red. REDES—Revista Hispana para el Análisis de Redes Sociales, 12(25), 85–108.
Grossetti, M. (2009). ¿Qué es una relación social? Un conjunto de mediaciones diádicas. REDES—Revista Hispana para el Análisis de Redes Sociales, 16(2), 44–62.
Hou, H., Kretschmer, H., & Liu, Z. (2008). The structure of scientific collaboration networks in scietometrics. Scientometrics, 75(2), 189–202.
INAOE. (2003). Anuario 2003. CONACYT. http://www.conacyt.gob.mx/siicyt/index.php/centros-de-investigacion-conacyt/centros-de-investigacion-conacyt/coordinados-por-conacyt/ciencias-exactas-y-naturales/instituto-nacional-de-astrofisica-optica-electronica/anuarios-1998-2009-6/1118-anuario-inaoe-2003. Accessed 16 Feb 2013.
ISTEC. (1999). Informe Trimestral ISTEC. IX Asamblea General de ISTEC, 17–19 novembre, Ft. Lauderdale. www.istec.net/archive/quarterly-messages/qm1-esp.doc. Accessed 22 Sept 2010.
Jaén, J. B. (2005). El clúster de la electrónica de la región metropolitana de Guadalajara: Un análisis comparativo. Carta Económica Regional, 17(91), 39–50.
Kamada, T., & Kawai, S. (1989). An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs. Information Proceeding Letters, 31(1), 7–15.
Kolleck, N. (2013). Social network analysis in innovation research: Using a mixed methods approach to analyze social innovations. European Journal of Futures Research. doi:10.1007/s40309-013-0025-2.
Meyer, M. (2000). Does science push technology? Patent citing scientific literature. Research Policy, 29(3), 409–434.
Moed, H. F., Glänzel, W., & Schmoch, U. (2004). Handbook of quantitative science and technology research: The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S&T systems. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Morillo, F., & Aparicio, J. (2011). Características y disparidades entre sub-especialidades: Un estudio de caso con grupos de Biotecnología. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 34(4), 563–580.
Mullins, N. (1972). The development of a scientific specialty: The Phage Group and the origins of molecular biology. Minerva, 10(1), 51–82.
OECD. (2007). Main science and technology indicators (Vol. 2007/1). Paris: OECD.
Porter, A. L., & Rafols, I. (2009). Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time. Scientometrics, 81(3), 719–745.
Rafols, I., Porter, A. L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Science overlay maps: A new tool for research policy and library management. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(9), 1871–1887.
Robles-Belmont, E. (2011). Les Fondations, acteurs de l’émergence des nouvelles technologies dans les pays non hégémoniques : le cas des micro et nanotechnologies au Mexique. Thèse de Doctorat, Université de Grenoble.
Robles-Belmont, E., & Vinck, D. (2012). Organismos filantrópicos y no gubernamentales en el desarrollo de nuevas ciencias y tecnologías: El caso de las micro y nanotecnologías en México. Revista Tecnología e Sociedade, 15, 45–70.
Schmidt, S. (2009). La dificultad de medir. REDES—Revista Hispana para el Análisis de Redes Sociales, 17(7), 163–183.
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538.
Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2012). A new methodology for constructing a publication-level classification system of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(12), 2378–2392.
Wang, F., Qiu, J., & Yu, H. (2012). Research on the cross-citation relationship of core authors in scientometrics. Scientometrics, 91(3), 1011–1033.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Robles-Belmont, E. (2016). On the Evolution of Research Networks: The Case of Micro Technologies in Mexico. In: Horta, H., Heitor, M., Salmi, J. (eds) Trends and Challenges in Science and Higher Education. Knowledge Studies in Higher Education, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20964-7_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20964-7_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20963-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20964-7
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)