Abstract
How do Dutch people let each other know that they disagree? What do they say when they want to resolve their difference of opinion by way of an argumentative discussion? In what way do they convey that they are convinced by each other’s argumentation? How do they criticize each other’s argumentative moves? Which words and expressions do they use in these endeavors? By answering these questions this short essay provides a brief inventory of the language of argumentation in Dutch.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (1996). Waar slaat dat nou weer op? De taal van het meningsverschil. Amsterdam/Antwerpen: Contact.
van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., Snoeck Henkemans, A. F., Blair, J. A., Johnson, R. H., Krabbe, E. C. W., et al. (1996). Fundamentals of argumentation theory. Handbook of historical backgrounds and contemporary developments. Mawhah N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van Eemeren, F.H. (2015). The Language of Argumentation in Dutch. In: Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Argumentation Library, vol 27. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20954-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20955-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)