A Pilot Study of Exploring the Relationship Between Dechnology Product and Product Personality

  • Wen-Zhong SuEmail author
  • Hsi-Yen Lin
  • Chi-Ying Hung
  • Pei-Hua Hung
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9180)


Cultural creative products emphasize personalization to meet the needs of consumers who hope to be unique and different. The purpose of this study is to explore whether if there is a correlation between consumers’ dominant or recessive personality traits and their selection of or preference for products. This study is divided into three stages, the first stage finds the relationship between personality traits and the five aspects of product personalization through literature review; the second stage is an experiment that recruits 105 college juniors in day school and night school, and asks them to complete a PDP personality test to learn the personality traits of these college consumers; the third stage provides a manual containing 41 designed Dechnology products and asks the subjects to intuitively choose products based on their own preference. The subjects are not under any pressure and do not need to evaluate the products’ design, functions or aesthetics. After data collection is completed, subjects’ personality traits are categorized and the product voting results are analyzed. Finally, this study concludes that there is a significant correlation between consumers’ personality traits and their preference for Dechnology products. After compiling statistics on similar and different selections made by subjects with each personality trait, this study found that products selected by subjects with different personality traits also have multiple personalities. This study also found that consumers with different personality traits showed different preferences when selecting products, and analysis of products’ design and functions showed that product personality was consistent with consumers’ personality trait. Results of this study can serve as reference for product planners, designers and marketing personnel.


PDP Dechnology Personality traits Product personality 



The authors gratefully acknowledge the support for this research provided by the Ministry of Science and Technology under Grant No. MOSY-103-2410-H-144-003 and MOST-103-2221-E-144-001. The authors also wishes to thank Prof. Jhon. G. Kreifeldt and Po-Hsien Lin, especially, Prof. Rungtai Lin.


  1. Aaker, J.L.: Dimensions of brand personality. J. Mark. Res. 34, 354 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allport, G.W.: Personality: A Psychological Interpretation. Holt, Rinehart & Winson, New York (1937)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Costa Jr., P.T., McCrae, R.R.: NEO—PIR: Professional Manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, FL (1992)Google Scholar
  4. Creusen, M.E.H., Schoormans, J.P.: The different roles of product appearance in consumer choice. J. Prod. Innov. Manage. 22(1), 63–81 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gatewood, R.D., Field, H.S.: Human Resource Selection. The Dryden Press, Forthworth (1998)Google Scholar
  6. Govers, P., Mugge, R.: ‘I love my jeep, because its tough like me’: the effect of product-personality congruence on product attachment. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Design and Emotion, Ankara, Turkey (2004)Google Scholar
  7. Govers, P., Schoormans, J.P.: Product personality and its influence on consumer preference. J. Consum. Mark. 22(4), 189–197 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jordan, P.W.: Producst as personalities. Paper presented at the Contemporary Ergonomics, Hanson, MA (1997)Google Scholar
  9. Lewalski, Z.: Product Esthetics – An Interpretation for Designers. Design & Development Engineering Press, Carson City (1988)Google Scholar
  10. Lin, H.T., Chang, W.L.: Order selection and pricing methods using flexible quantity and fuzzy approach for buyer evaluation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 187(2), 415–428 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. McCrae, R.R., Costa Jr. P.T.: Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 52(1), 81–90 (1987)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Mugge, R., Govers, P., Schoormans, J.P.: The development and testing of a product personality scale. Des. Stud. 30, 287–302 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sirgy, M.J.: Self-concept in consumer behavior: a critical review. J. Consum. Res. 9(3), 287–300 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lin, R., Kreifeldt, J.G.: Do Not Touch: The Conversation Between Dechonology and Literature of Art (2014)Google Scholar
  15. Zhou, Z.J.: The Shaping of Complexity Image-Based on the Characteristics of Style. Chenkong University, Tainan (2001)Google Scholar
  16. Yang, M.Y., Yu, W.L.: The product traits of Alessi products. Res. Des. J. 11(1), 1–22 (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wen-Zhong Su
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hsi-Yen Lin
    • 1
  • Chi-Ying Hung
    • 1
  • Pei-Hua Hung
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate School of Creative Industry DesignNational Taiwan University of ArtsBan Ciao District, New Taipei CityTaiwan

Personalised recommendations