Advertisement

Comparative Analysis of Regular Grid Based Algorithms in the Design of Graphical Control Panels

  • Jerzy Grobelny
  • Rafał MichalskiEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9169)

Abstract

The paper presents comparative investigation of the effectiveness of three algorithms used for optimizing control panel objects’ arrangements. We examined two modified classical approaches involving changing of objects’ pairs, that is CRAFT, and its simplified version as well as our implementation of the Simulated annealing concept. Their behavior was investigated in experimental simulation studies of two real-life problems: the truck control panel (small number of objects) and the control panel from a nuclear energy plant (big number of items). The statistical analysis of the obtained results showed the supremacy of the proposed version of the simulated annealing algorithm in both case studies.

Keywords

Display design Control panels Layout optimization Ergonomics CRAFT Simulated annealing 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The work was partially financially supported by the Polish National Science Center grant no. 2011/03/B/ST8/06238.

References

  1. Bonney, H.M., Wiliams, R.W.: CAPABLE: a computer program to layout controls and panels. Ergonomics 20, 297–316 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Buffa, E.S., Armour, G.C., Vollmann, T.E.: Allocating facilities with CRAFT. Harv. Bus. Rev. 42(2), 136–158 (1964)Google Scholar
  3. Cheng-Jhe, L., Changxu, W.: Improved link analysis method for user interface design– modified link table and optimisation-based algorithm. Behav. Inf. Technol. 29(2), 199–216 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gavett, J.W., Plyter, N.V.: The optimal assignment of facilities to locations by branch and bound. Oper. Res. 14, 210–232 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fitts, P.M.: The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J. Exp. Psychol. 49, 389–391 (1954)Google Scholar
  6. Hani, Y., Amodeo, L., Yalaoui, F., Chen, H.: Ant colony optimization for solving an industrial layout problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 183(2), 633–642 (2007)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Heragu, S.S., Alfa, A.S.: Experimental analysis of simulated annealing based algorithms for the layout problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 57(2), 190–202 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C.D., Vecchi, M.P.: Optimization by simulated annealing. Sci. 220(4598), 671–680 (1983)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Kusiak, A., Heragu, S.S.: The facility layout problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 29(3), 229–251 (1987)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. McCormick, E.J.: Human Factors in Engineering and Design. Mc Graw – Hill, New York (1976)Google Scholar
  11. Saaty, T.L.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh (1996)Google Scholar
  12. Sargent, T.A., Kay, M.G., Sargent, R.G.: A methodology for optimally designing console panels for use by a single operator. Hum. Factors 39(3), 389–409 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Shengyuan, Y., Chen, Y., Chen, W.: An intelligent algorithm method of element layout priority sequence on console’s human machine interface. Adv. Mater. Res. 712–715, 2441–2446 (2013)Google Scholar
  14. Singh, S.P., Sharma, R.R.K.: A review of different approaches to the facility layout problems. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 30(5–6), 425–433 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Singh, S.P., Sharma, R.R.K.: Two-level modified simulated annealing based approach for solving facility layout problem. Int. J. Prod. Res. 46(13), 3563–3582 (2008)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Wierwille, W.W.: Statistical techniques for instrument panel arrangement in Manned Systems Design, NATO Conference Series. Hum. Factors 17, 201–218 (1981)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wrocław University of TechnologyWrocławPoland

Personalised recommendations