Advertisement

Using Diary Studies to Evaluate Railway Dispatching Software

  • Isabel SchützEmail author
  • Anselmo Stelzer
  • Andreas Oetting
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9169)

Abstract

In this paper, we present the application of User Diaries in the context of connection dispatching. Connection dispatching is a field with quickly rising requirements which also affect the used dispatching support software. The usage of User Diaries will be motivated for this specific domain. The diary will briefly be presented as well as the results of the study. We will point out the advantages and disadvantages using User Diaries in the given context.

Keywords

Diary Study Transportation Company Conflict Detection Prototype Software Number Search 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Kauppi, A., Wiktström, J., Sandblad, B., Andersson, A.W.: Future train traffic control: control by replanning. Spec. Issue Int. J. Cogn. Technol. Work (IC-CTW) 8, 50–56 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Isaksson-Luttemann, G., Kauppi, A., Andersson, A.W., Sandblad, B., Erlandsson, M.: Operative tests of a new system for train traffic control. Rail Human Factors around the World: Impacts on and of People for Successful Rail Operations, pp. 424–433 (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Isaksson-Luttemann, G.: Future Train Traffic Control: Development and deployment of new principles and systems in train traffic control. Licentiate thesis, Uppsala University, Uppsala (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wikström, J., Kauppi, A., Hellström, P., Andersson, A.W., Sandblad, B.: Train traffic control by re-planning in real-time. In: Allan, J., Brebbia, C., Hill, R., Sciutto, G., Sone, S. (eds.) Computers in Railways IX. Computers in Railways IX, vol. 74, pp. 733–742. WIT Press, Wessex (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schöbel, A.: Integer programming approaches for solving the delay management problem. In: Geraets, F., Kroon, L.G., Schoebel, A., Wagner, D., Zaroliagis, C.D. (eds.) Railway Optimization 2004. LNCS, vol. 4359, pp. 145–170. Springer, Heidelberg (2007) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kliewer, N.: Mathematische optimierung zur unterstützung kundenorientierter disposition im schienenverkehr. In: Chamoni, P. (ed.) Selected Papers of the International Conference on Operations Research. Operations research proceedings, vol. 2001, pp. 473–480. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Suhl, L., Biederbick, C., Kliewer, N.: Design of customer-oriented dispatching support for railways. In: Voss, S., Daduna, J.R. (eds.) Computer-aided scheduling of public transport. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol. 505, pp. 365–386. Springer, Berlin (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kurby, S.: Makroskopisches Echtzeitdispositionsmodell zur Lösung von Anschlusskonflikten im Eisenbahnbetrieb. Zugl. Dissertation an der TU Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Scheier, B., Schöne, S., Dietsch, S.: Assistenz zur anschlusssicherung im intermodalen verkehr mittels echtzeitdaten. ZEV rail Glasers Annalen 138(6–7), 224–230 (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stelzer, A., Oetting, A.: Konzeption einer Konfliktlösung einschließlich einer Bewertungsmethode für die Anschlussdisposition. In: Fakultä Verkehrswissenschaften Friedrich List, (ed.): 24. Verkehrswissenschaftlichen Tage 2014, Fakultät Verkehrswissenschaften Friedrich List (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Oetting, A., Stelzer, A.: Conflict resolution in connection dispatching. In: Hansen, I.A., Tomii, N., Hirai, C. (eds.) 6th International Conference on Railway Operations Modelling and Analysis (2015) (accepted for presentation)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stelzer, A., Oetting, A., Chu, F.: Connection dispatching - an algorithmic and visual support for the dispatcher. In: WCTRS (ed.) Selected Proceedings WCTR 2013, Rio de Janeiro, WCTRS (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stelzer, A., Schütz, I., Oetting, A.: Evaluating novel user interfaces in (safety critical) railway environments. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCI 2014, Part III. LNCS, vol. 8512, pp. 502–512. Springer, Heidelberg (2014) Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Streitzig, C., Stelzer, A., Schön, S., Chu, F.: TU darmstadt - research training and more besides. EURAILmag 26(26), 152–159 (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Willumeit, H., Gediga, G., Hamborg, K.C.: IsoMetrics: ein verfahren zur formativen evaluation von software nach ISO 9241/10. Ergonomie und Informatik 27, 5–12 (1996)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Polson, P.G., Lewis, C., Rieman, J., Wharton, C.: Cognitive walkthroughs: a method for theory-based evaluation of user interfaces. Int. J. Man. Mach. Stud. 36(5), 741–773 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stelzer, A., Schütz, I.: Field evaluation of a new railway dispatching software. In: The Eighth International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions, Lisbon, Portugal, Feb 2015 (accepted for presentation)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sharp, H., Rogers, Y., Preece, J.: Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester (2007) Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schlick, C., Bruder, R., Luczak, H.: Arbeitswissenschaft. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg (2010) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rubin, J., Chisnell, D.: Handbook of Usability Testing: How to Plan, Design, and Conduct Effective Tests. John Wiley & Sons, Indianapolis (2008) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Isabel Schütz
    • 1
    Email author
  • Anselmo Stelzer
    • 1
  • Andreas Oetting
    • 1
  1. 1.Railway EngineeringTechnische Universität DarmstadtDarmstadtGermany

Personalised recommendations