Advertisement

An Interaction Design Method to Support the Expression of User Intentions in Collaborative Systems

  • Cristiane Josely JensenEmail author
  • Julio Cesar Dos Reis
  • Rodrigo Bonacin
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9169)

Abstract

The communication and interpretation of users’ intentions play a key role in collaborative web discussions. However, existing mechanisms fail to support the users’ expression of their intentions during collaborations. In this article, we propose an original interaction design method based on semiotics to guide the construction of interactive mechanisms, which allow users to explicitly express and share intentions. We apply the method in a case study in the context of collaborative forums for software developers. The obtained results reveal preliminary evidences regarding the effectiveness of the method for the definition of interface components, enabling more meaningful and successful communications.

Keywords

Collaborative web Intentions Pragmatics Collaboration Interaction design Organizational semiotics 

References

  1. 1.
    Bonacin, R., Hornung, H., Reis, J.C., Pereira, R., Baranauskas, M.C.C.: Pragmatic aspects of collaborative problem solving: towards a framework for conceptualizing dynamic knowledge. In: Cordeiro, J., Maciaszek, L.A., Filipe, J. (eds.) ICEIS 2012. LNBIP, vol. 141, pp. 410–426. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bonacin, R., Reis, J.C., Hornung, H., Baranauskas, M.C.C.: An ontological model for supporting intention-based information sharing on collaborative problem solving. Int. J. Collaborative Enterp. 3(2–3), 130–150 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hornung, H.H., Pereira, R., Baranauskas, M.C.C., Bonacin, R., Reis, J.C.: Identifying pragmatic patterns of collaborative problem solving. In: Proceedings of IADIS International Conference WWW/Internet 2012, pp. 379–387 (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liu, K.: Semiotics in Information Systems Engineering. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Searle, J.R.: A classification of illocutionary acts. Lang. Soc. 5(1), 1–23 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The semantic web. Sci. Am. 284(5), 34–43 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Singh, M.P.: The pragmatic web. IEEE Internet Comput. 6(3), 4–5 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hasan, B., Ahmed, M.U.: Effects of interface style on user perceptions and behavioral intention to use computer systems. Comput. Hum. Behav. 23(6), 3025–3037 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yang, X., Li, Y., Tan, C., Teo, H., et al.: Students’ participation intention in an online discussion forum: why is computer-mediated interaction attractive? Inf. Manag. 44(5), 456–466 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goss, S., Heinze, C.A., Pearce, A.: Recognising user intentions in a virtual environment. In: Proceedings of the Simulation Technology and Training Conference, pp. 247–254 (1999)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Griol, D., Molina, J., Callejas, Z.: Modeling the user state for context-aware spoken interaction in ambient assisted living. Appl. Intell. 40(4), 749–771 (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tang, X., Liu, K., Cui, J., Wen, F., Wang, X.: IntentSearch: capturing user intention for one-click internet image search. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 34(7), 1342–1353 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chen, Z., Lin, F., Liu, H., Liu, Y., Ma, H., Wenyin, L.: User intention modeling in web applications using data mining. World Wide Web 5(3), 181–191 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Falb, J., et al.: Using communicative acts in interaction design specifications for automated synthesis of user interfaces. In: 21st IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hornung, H., Baranauskas, M.C.C.: Towards a conceptual framework for interaction design for the pragmatic web. In: Jacko, J.A. (ed.) Human-Computer Interaction, Part I, HCII 2011. LNCS, vol. 6761, pp. 72–81. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Peirce, C.S.: Collected Papers. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, USA (1931–1958)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stamper, R.K.: Information in Business and Administrative Systems. Wiley, New York (1973)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Neviarouskaya, A., Prendinger, H., Ishizuka, M.: EmoHeart: Conveying Emotions in Second Life Based on Affect Sensing from Text, pp. 1–13. Hindawi Publishing Corporation, Cairo (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Huang, A.H., Yen, D.C., Zhang, X.: Exploring the potential effects of emoticons. Inf. Manage. 45(7), 466–473 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hayashi, E.C.S., Baranauskas, M.C.C.: Understanding meta-communication in an inclusive scenario. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 1213–2328 (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cristiane Josely Jensen
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • Julio Cesar Dos Reis
    • 1
  • Rodrigo Bonacin
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.FACCAMPCampo Limpo PaulistaBrazil
  2. 2.Center for Information Technology Renato ArcherCampinasBrazil
  3. 3.FAHHortolândiaBrazil

Personalised recommendations