Advertisement

The Closer the Better: Effects of Developer-User Proximity for Mutual Learning

  • Sturla BakkeEmail author
  • Tone Bratteteig
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9169)

Abstract

In this paper we report from a software development project, where much attention was given to the users – so much, in fact, that the developers moved in with them and stayed. Our aim has been to understand the effects of this level of proximity in the cooperation between developers and users. We discuss the impact on continuous knowledge exchange, organisational structure and accountability when the developers move in. How do the participants experience the mutual learning process? Based on the findings, we offer the two suggestions: (1) that the mutual learning necessary for establishing a common understanding of the character of a user-centred software system and its intuitive operation has a greater possibility of succeeding when developers and participating users are located in the immediate vicinity of each other, and (2) the impact on user interface design is visible through early user participation, leading to the sense of user interfaces facilitating an immediate user interaction.

Keywords

Participation Reciprocal learning Organisational structure 

References

  1. 1.
    Bratteteig, T., Bødker, K., Dittrich, Y., Mogensen, P., Simonsen, J.: Methods: organizing principles and general guidelines for participatory design projects. In: Simonsen, J., Robertson, T. (eds.) Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design. Routledge, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bansler, J.P., Havn, E.C.: Information systems development with generic systems. In: ECIS, pp. 707–715 (1994)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bjerknes, G., Bratteteig, T.: Florence in wonderland. In: Bjerknes, G., Ehn, P., Kyng, M. (eds.) Computers and Democracy - a Scandinavian Challenge. Avebury, Wiltshire (1987)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bjerknes, G., Bratteteig, T.: User Participation and democracy: a discussion of scandinavian research on system development. Scand. J. Inf. Syst. 7(1), 73–98 (1995)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bratteteig, T., Wagner, I.: Disentangling Participation: Power and Decision-making in Participatory Design. Springer, Cham (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ehn, P.: Scandinavian design: on participation and skill. In: Schuler, D., Namioka, A. (eds.) Hillsdale Participatory Design: Principles and Practices, pp. 41–77. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1993)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Greenbaum, J.M., Kyng, M.: Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale (1991)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nygaard, K.: The iron and metal project: trade union participation. Computers dividing man and work - Recent Scandinavian research on planning and computers from a trade union perspective Demos project report 13, pp. 94–107 (1979)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schuler, D., Namioka, A.: Participatory Design: Principles and practices. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale (1993)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Simonsen, J., Robertson, T.: Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design. Routledge, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schön, D.A.: The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic books, New York (1983)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schön, D.A., Wiggins, G.: Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing. Des. Stud. 13(2), 135–156 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schön, D.A.: Knowing-in-action: the new scholarship requires a new epistemology. Change: Mag. High. Learn. 27(6), 27–34 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bjerknes, G., Bratteteig, T.: The memoirs of two survivors: or the evaluation of a computer system for cooperative work. In: Proceedings of the 1988 ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 167–177. ACM (1988)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bellotti, V., Bly, S.: Walking away from the desktop computer: distributed collaboration and mobility in a product design team. In: Proceedings of the 1996 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 209–218. ACM (1996)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dourish, P., Bellotti, V.: Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces. In: Proceedings of the 1992 ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 107–114. ACM (1992)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Heath, C., Svensson, M.S., Hindmarsh, J., Luff, P., Vom Lehn, D.: Configuring awareness. Comput. Support. Coop. Work (CSCW) 11(3–4), 317–347 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Luff, P., Heath, C.: Mobility in collaboration. In: Proceedings of the 1998 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 305–314. ACM (1998)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schmidt, K.: The problem with awareness: Introductory remarks on awareness in CSCW. Comput. Support. Coop. Work (CSCW) 11(3–4), 285–298 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schmidt, K., Bannon, L.: Taking CSCW seriously. Comput. Support. Coop. Work (CSCW) 1(1), 7–40 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dreyfus, H.L., Dreyfus, S.E.: Mind Over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer. Free Press, New York (1986)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Brooks, F.P.: The Mythical Man-Month. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bødker, S., Ehn, P., Kammersgaard, J., Kyng, M., Sundblad, Y.: A UTOPIAN experience: on design of powerful computer-based tools for skilled graphic workers. In: Bjerknes, G., Ehn, P., Kyng, M. (eds.) Computers and Democracy: A Scandinavian Challenge. Avebury, Wiltshire (1987)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Garfinkel, H.: Ethnomethodological Studies of Work. Routledge, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Heath, C., Luff, P.: Technology in Action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Suchman, L., Trigg, R., Blomberg, J.: Working artefacts: ethnomethods of the prototype. Br. J. Sociol. 53(2), 163–179 (2002). doi: 10.1080/00071310220133287 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of TechnologyWesterdals - Oslo School of Arts, Communication and TechnologyOsloNorway
  2. 2.Department of InformaticsUniversity of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations