Advertisement

Affordances Feature on Package Design has Preference Effect on Content

  • Jerry LinEmail author
  • Cheng-Hung Lo
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9187)

Abstract

People use package to protect and express product, a good design feature on package will enhance preference of consumers. Affordance is human instinct that suggest action of usage and it imply attractive. This study prove that a package has affordance design not only provide consumers’ a positive emotional experience, better to influence consumers’ positive perception to the contents. The outcome may assist designers in selecting or modifying package designs for achieving desired consumer responses.

Keywords

Affordance Package design Perceptual information Usability 

References

  1. Clement, J.: Visual influence on in-store buying decisions: an eye-track experiment on the visual influence of packaging design. J. Mark. Manage. 23(9–10), 917–928 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Clement, J., Kristensen, T., Grønhaug, K.: Understanding consumers’ in-store visual perception: the influence of package design features on visual attention. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 20, 234–239 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gibson, J.J.: The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Psychology Press, New York (2013)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Gustafson, S., Twomey, C., Bix, L.: An affordance-based methodology for package design. Packag. Technol. Sci. 28, 157–171 (2014)Google Scholar
  5. Hoogland, C.T., de Boer, J., Boersema, J.J.: Food and sustainability: Do consumers recognize, understand and value on-package information on production standards? Appetite 49(1), 47–57 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kissler, J., Herbert, C., Winkler, I., Junghofer, M.: Emotion and attention in visual word processing—an ERP study. Biol. Psychol. 80(1), 75–83 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. McGrenere, J., Ho, W.: Affordances: clarifying and evolving a concept. Paper presented at the Graphics Interface (2000)Google Scholar
  8. Norman, D.A.: Affordance, conventions, and design. Interactions 6(3), 38–43 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Orth, U.R., Malkewitz, K.: Holistic package design and consumer brand impressions. J. Mark. 72(3), 64–81 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Reimann, M., Zaichkowsky, J., Neuhaus, C., Bender, T., Weber, B.: Aesthetic package design: a behavioral, neural, and psychological investigation. J. Consum. Psychol. 20(4), 431–441 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Righi, S., Orlando, V., Marzi, T.: Attractiveness and affordance shape tools neural coding: Insight from ERPs. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 91(3), 240–253 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Schifferstein, H.N., Fenko, A., Desmet, P., Labbe, D., Martin, N.: Influence of package design on the dynamics of multisensory and emotional food experience. Food Qual. Prefer. 27(1), 18–25 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Velasco, C., Salgado-Montejo, A., Marmolejo-Ramos, F., Spence, C.: Predictive packaging design: tasting shapes, typefaces, names, and sounds. Food Qual. Prefer. 34, 88–95 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Industrial DesignChang Gung UniversityKwei-Shan, Tao-YuanTaiwan, R.O.C.

Personalised recommendations