Advertisement

Children’s Mental Model as a Tool to Provide Innovation in Digital Products

  • Adriana ChammasEmail author
  • Manuela Quaresma
  • Cláudia Renata Mont’Alvão
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9187)

Abstract

The technological development market is faced with the growing demand for products whose innovations break paradigms. The User-Centered Design approach is used with praise to cause incremental innovations in digital products, but it is not ideal to realize radical innovations. This article aims to present the state of the art in question and ask whether the mental model of children, whose creativity is evident, can be applied to the development process with a User Centered Design approach, and, if so, how to adapt this approach to accelerate the development of radically innovative products to the market.

Keywords

HCI Methodology Children Creativity Innovation 

References

  1. 1.
    Barclay, C.R., Petitto, A.L.: Creative activity in the context of real life: a response to Csikszentmihalyi. New Ideas Psychol. 7(1), 41–48 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beyer, H.R., Holtzblatt, K.: Contextual design. Interactions 6(1), 32–42 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bruckman, A., Bandlow, A.: Human-Computer Interaction for Kids. In: Jacko, J., Sears, A. (eds.) The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook, vol. 1, pp. 428–440. Lawence Erlbaum, Hillsdale (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bruckman, A.: Teaching students to study online communities ethically. J. Inf. Ethics 15(2), 82–98 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carmel, E., Whitaker, R., George, J.: PD and joint application design: a transatlantic comparison. Commun. ACM - Spec. Issue Participatory Des. 36(4), 40–48 (1993)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chammas, A., Moraes, A., Teixeira, A.: Ergonomics and Usability for Children: Spore®: a Study Case. Ergonomia e usabilidade de interfaces para crianças: o estudo de caso do game Spore®. Dissertação (mestrado) – Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, PUC Rio, Rio de Janeiro (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Motivation and creativity: towards a synthesis of structural and energistic approaches to cognition. New Ideas Psychol. 6, 159–176 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dietrich, A.: Who’s afraid of a cognitive neuroscience of creativity? Sci. Direct Methods 42, 22–27 (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Druin, A., Bederson, B., Boltman, A., Miura, A., Knotts-Callahan, D., Platt, M.: Children as our technology design partners. In: Druin, A. (ed.) The Design of Children’s Technology, vol. 1, pp. 51–72. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Druin, A.: Children as co-designers of new technologies: valuing the imagination to transform what is possible. New Dir. Youth Dev. Theor. Pract. Res. Youth Media Creators 128, 35–44 (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    ISO 9241-210 (2010): ISO 9241-210. Ergonomics Of Human-System Interaction – Part 210: Human-Centred Design For Interactive Systems. Génève: International Organization Standarization (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kelley, T., Littman, J.: The Ten Faces of Innovation. IDEO’s Strategies for Defeating the Devil’s Advocate and Driving Creativity Throughout Your Organization. Doubleday, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lettl, C.: User Involvement Competence for Radical Innovation. J. Eng. Tech. Manage. 24(1–2), 53–75 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Markopoulos, P., et al.: Evaluating Children’s Interactive Products: Principles and Practices for Interactions Designers. Morgan Kaufmann (Elsevier, Inc.), Burlington (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nesset, V., Large, A.: Children in the information technology design process: a review of theories and their applications. Sci. Direct Libr. Inf. Sci. Res. 26, 140–161 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Norman, D.A.: Design of Everyday Things, Revised and Expanded: Basic Books. MIT Press (UK edition) New York, London (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Norman, D.A., Verganti, R.: Incremental and radical innovation: design research versus technology and meaning change. Des. Issues 30(1), 78–96 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Russ, S.W., Fiorelli, J.A.: Developmental approaches to creativity. In: Kaufman, J.C., Sternberg, R.J. (eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity, vol. 12. Cambridge University Press, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Saffer, D.: Designing for Interaction. New Riders, Berkeley (2010)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Simonton, D.K.: Creativity: cognitive, personal, developmental, and social aspects. Am. Psychol. Assoc. Am. Psychol. 55(1), 151–158 (2000)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Scaife, M., Rogers, Y.: Kids as informants: telling us what we didn’t know or confirming what we knew already? In: Druin, A. (ed.) The Design of Children’s Technology. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Brighton (1999)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sternberg, R., Lubart, T.: Investing in creativity. Am. Psychol. 51(7), 677–688 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Szekely, G.: How Children Make Art: Lessons in Creativity from Home to School. Teachers College Press, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Villar, M.S., Franco, F.M.M.: Houaiss Portuguese Dictionary - Dicionário Houaiss da língua Portuguesa. Objetiva, Rio de Janeiro (2009)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Von Hippel, E.A.: The Sources of Innovation. Oxford University Press, New York (1988)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Von Hippel, E.A.: Democratizing Innovation. MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wright, S.: Understanding Creativity in Early Childhood: Meaning-Making and Children’s Drawings. SAGE Publications, London (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adriana Chammas
    • 1
    Email author
  • Manuela Quaresma
    • 1
  • Cláudia Renata Mont’Alvão
    • 1
  1. 1.LEUI | Laboratory of Ergodesign and Usability InterfacesPUC-Rio UniversityRio de JaneiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations