Advertisement

Humanizing Labor Resource in a Discrete Event Manufacturing Simulation Software

  • Lia Buarque de Macedo GuimarãesEmail author
  • Carlos Sergio Schneider
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9187)

Abstract

Simulation is a decision making support tool very useful for the design and dimensioning of manufacturing plants. Although workmanship hand is largely employed in production systems, labor involved in the process is often modeled as an inanimate predictable resource (like machines, tools or equipment). In order to make simulation more realistic, this study applied ergonomics principles (circadian rhythm and rest pauses) to the labor resource of a software that is largely used in commercial applications. Results showed that this “humanization” impact the simulation results. Production outcomes from the circadian rhythm modeling were up to 7 % higher than the ones obtained with the standard PROMODEL modeling; the introduction of 5 min rest pauses increased productivity in less than 1 %. Overall, these results justify the development of computational routines able to represent “humans” and their interactions with the system in a more realistic manner.

Keywords

Simulation Ergonomics Circadian rhythm Production systems 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was partly supported by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) and the Capes Foundation/Ministry of Education (CAPES).

References

  1. 1.
    Baines, T., Stephen, M., Siebers, P.O., Ladbrook, J.: Humans: the missing link in manufacturing simulation? School of Industrial and Manufacturing Science. Cranfield University. Elsevier, B.V. Bedfordshire UK (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Spencer, M.B.: The influence of irregularity of rest and activity on performance: a model based on time since sleep and time of day. Ergonomics 30, 1275–1286 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Parker, H.W., Oglesby, C.H.: Methods improvement for construction managers. McGraw-Hill, New York (1972)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Monk, T.H., Buysse, D.J., Reynolds III, C.F., Berga, S.L., Jarrett, D.B., Begley, A.E., Kupfer, D.J.: Circadian rhythms in human performance and mood under constant conditions. J. Sleep Res. 6, 9–18 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grandjean, E.: Ergonomics in Computerized Office. Taylor and Francis, London (1987)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bhatia, N., Murrell, K.F.H.: An industrial experiment in organized rest pauses. Hum. Factors 11, 167–173 (1969)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vernon, H.M., Bedford, T.: The influence of Rest Pauses on Light Industrial Work. Industrial Fatigue Research Board. Report Nr. 25 (1924)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Viteles, M.S.: Industrial Psychology. W.W. Norton and Company, New York (1932)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lia Buarque de Macedo Guimarães
    • 1
    Email author
  • Carlos Sergio Schneider
    • 2
  1. 1.Graduate Program in Industrial EngineeringFederal University of Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreBrazil
  2. 2.Feevale University CenterNovo HamburgoBrazil

Personalised recommendations