Experiences, Problems and Solutions in Computer Usage by Subjects with Tetraplegia

  • Fausto O. MedolaEmail author
  • Jamille Lanutti
  • Claudia G. Bentim
  • Adrieli Sardella
  • Ana Elisa Franchinni
  • Luis C. Paschoarelli
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9187)


For the vast majority of users, the most conventional means of interaction with a computer is through the use of the keyboard and the mouse. The act of typing and clicking in a satisfactory speed requires a level of motor ability and coordination, which is provided by the integration of both sensory and neuromotor functions. Among many neurological problems that may affect movement control, tetraplegia due to spinal cord injury challenges the subject to adopt to a severe sensory-motor impairment of the lower limbs, trunk and partial or total affection of the upper limbs. Therefore, tetraplegia represents an important limitation for the user in his/her ability to interact with a computer in a satisfactory and conventional way (keyboard-typing and mouse-clicking). This paper aims to investigate the experiences, problems and solutions used by persons with tetraplegia due to spinal cord injury in daily computer usage. The study sample was comprised by five with tetraplegia due to spinal cord injury. All the subjects had a certain degree of function in the upper limbs, and their levels of injury were between C5 and C7 (fifth to seventh spinal cord segment). A questionnaire with multiple-choice questions about subjects’ interaction with computers in daily usage was applied. The questions aimed to understand their experiences and problems when using a computer (typing, clicking and printing, among others), as well as the use of assistive devices aimed to facilitate the computer usage. Prior to the study, all subjects were informed about the study objectives and procedures, and signed an informed consent form after agreeing in participate in the study. Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethical Committee of the Faculty of Architecture, Arts and Communication - UNESP. The results show that subjects with tetraplegia experience a number of problems when using a computer. These problems occur with the use of all the computer components, such as keyboard, mouse, cables and accessories. The severe upper limb impairment is, ultimately, the main factor that limit the users’ ability to use a computer in an independent and efficient way. The current study contributes to the knowledge in the fields of ergonomics, design and assistive technologies, as it highlights the need of providing assistive solutions that truly contribute to the satisfactory use of computers by subjects with tetraplegia.


Tetraplegia Human-computer interface Ergonomics Assistive technologies 



The authors gratefully acknowledge CNPq (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development, Process No 458740/2013–6) for the financial support.


  1. Adad, L.B.: Plugga: Communication system for individuals quadriplegics. In: Proceedings of CBEB 2000 (2000). (in portuguese)Google Scholar
  2. Almeida, J.L.S.G., Kubatamaia, C.I., Bissaco, M.A.S., Frère, A.F.: Low cost device for the digital inclusion of quadriplegic. Proc. Ibero-Am. Inf. Technol. Spec. Educ. 3, 570–578 (2002). (in portuguese)Google Scholar
  3. Struijk, L.N.S.A.: An inductive tongue computer interface for control of computers and assistive devices. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 53(12), 2594–2597 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Betke, M., Gips, J., Fleming, P.: The camera mouse: visual tracking of body features to provide computer access for people with severe disabilities. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehab. Eng. 10(1), 1–10 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borges, J.A.: Voice scan system dosvox. Proc. Ibero-Am. Inf. Technol. Spec. Educ. 3, 6–7 (2002). (in portuguese)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. Bolton, M.P., Wytch, R.: Mouse emulator for tetraplegics. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 30(6), 665–668 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caltenco, H.A., Breidegard, B., Jönsson, B., Lotte, N.S., Struijk, A.: Understanding computer users with tetraplegia: survey of assistive technology users. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 28(4), 258–268 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen, C.L., Chen, H.C., Cheng, P.T., Cheng, C.Y., Cheng, H.C., Chou, H.C., Chou, S.W.: Enhancement of operational efficiencies for people with high cervical spinal cord injuries using a flexible integrated pointing device apparatus. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 87(6), 866–873 (2006). TaiwanCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ditunno, J.F., Young, W., Donovan, W.H., Creasey, G.: The international standards booklet for neurological and functional classification of spinal cord injury. Paraplegia 32, 70–80 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hansen, J.P., Torning, K., Johansen, S.A., Itoh, K., Aoki, H.: Gaze typing compared with input by head and hand. In: Proceedings of the 2004 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications, pp. 131–138. ACM (2004)Google Scholar
  11. Huo, X., Wang, J., Ghovanloo, M.: Introduction and preliminary evaluation of the tongue drive system: wireless tongue-operated assistive technology for people with little or no upper-limb function. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 45(6), 921–930 (2007)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Jeong, H., Kim, J.S., Son, W.H.: An emg-based mouse controller for a tetraplegic. Systems, man and cybernetic. In: IEEE International Conference on Man and Cybernetics Systems, (2), pp. 1229–1234 (2005)Google Scholar
  13. Park, K.S., Lee, K.T.: Eye-controlled human/computer interface using the line-of-sight and the intentional blink. Comput. Ind. Eng. 30(3), 463–473 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Li, Y., Nam, C.S.: A P300-based brain–computer interface: Effects of interface type and screen size. Intl. J. Hum Comput Interact. 27(1), 52–68 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Moore, R.K.: A comparison of the data requirements of automatic speech recognition systems and human listeners. In: INTERSPEECH (1), pp. 2582–2584 (2003)Google Scholar
  16. Springer, J., Siebes, C.: Position controlled input device for handicapped: Experimental studies with a footmouse. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 17(2), 135–152 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Snoek, G.J., Ijzerman, M.J., Hermens, H.J., Maxwell, D., Biering-Sorensen, F.: Survey of the needs of patients with spinal cord injury: Impact and priority for improvement in hand function in tetraplegics. Spinal Cord 42, 526–532 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chen, Y.L., Chen, W.L., Chen, T.-S., Kuo, J.S., Lai, T.S.: A head movement image (HMI)-controlled computer mouse for people with disabilities. Disabil. Rehabil. 25, 163–167 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fausto O. Medola
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Jamille Lanutti
    • 1
  • Claudia G. Bentim
    • 3
  • Adrieli Sardella
    • 2
  • Ana Elisa Franchinni
    • 2
  • Luis C. Paschoarelli
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Programme of Post-graduation in DesignUNESP – Univ. Estadual PaulistaBauruBrazil
  2. 2.Department of DesignUNESP – Univ. Estadual PaulistaBauruBrazil
  3. 3.SORRI – Center of RehabilitationBauruBrazil

Personalised recommendations