Advertisement

The Design of IdeaWorks: Applying Social Learning Networks to Support Tertiary Education

  • Lele Kang
  • Shaokun FanEmail author
  • J. Leon Zhao
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9191)

Abstract

Online education has progressed from having students passively read and watch materials to having them proactively engage in interactions with other students and teachers. Social network technologies enable students to interact with each other, leading to a new platform for online education. Based on the social learning theory, we design a new social learning network system, named IdeaWorks. Two empirical studies, a usability study and an impact study, were conducted to examine how the social learning network system (i.e., IdeaWorks) has an impact on students’ learning activities. The results of the usability study show that IdeaWorks’ design performs well on user interface, functionality, and process. Generally, users have a high level of usage intention towards IdeaWorks. The results of the impact study show that learning via IdeaWorks, as well as learning in traditional classrooms, enables users to perceive a high level of social presence, cognitive presence, satisfaction with the course, and satisfaction with the group. However, the impact study also showed that we should enhance IdeaWorks to support instructional communication and group communication in the context of online education.

Keywords

IdeaWorks Social learning networks Online education E-learning 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The work was partially supported by a grant from City University of Hong Kong (Project No. 6980108), and a grant from NSFC (Project No. 71471157).

References

  1. Adams, K.: The Sources of Innovation and Creativity, pp. 1–59. National Center on Education and the Economy, Washington (2005)Google Scholar
  2. Alonso, F., López, G., Manrique, D., Viñes, J.M.: An instructional model for web-based e-learning education with a blended learning process approach. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 36(2), 217–235 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-Qahtani, A.A.Y., Higgins, S.E.: Effects of traditional, blended and e-learning on students’ achievement in higher education. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 29(3), 220–234 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bandura, A., McClelland, D.C.: Social Learning Theory, pp. 217–235. General Learning Press, New York (1977)Google Scholar
  5. Benedek, M., Fink, A., Neubauer, A.C.: Enhancement of ideational fluency by means of computer-based training. Creativity Res. J. 18(3), 317–328 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chin, J.P., Diehl, V.A., Norman, L.K.: Development of an instrument measuring user satisfaction of the human-computer interface. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI 1988, pp. 213–218 (1988)Google Scholar
  7. Clements, D.H.: Enhancement of creativity in computer environments. Am. Educ. Res. J. 28(1), 173–187 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DeHaan, R.: Teaching creativity and inventive problem solving in science. CBE-Life Sci. Educ. 8(3), 172–181 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hill, J.R., Song, L., West, R.E.: Social learning theory and web-based learning environments: a review of research and discussion of implications. Am. J. Distance Educ. 23(2), 88–103 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hoic-Bozic, N., Mornar, V., Boticki, I.: A blended learning approach to course design and implementation. IEEE Trans. Educ. 52(1), 19–30 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lewis, J.R.: IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: psychometric evaluation and instructions for use. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 7(1), 57–78 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Osguthorpe, R.T., Graham, C.R.: Blended learning environments: definitions and directions. Q. Rev. Dist. Educ. 4(3), 227–233 (2003)Google Scholar
  13. Park, S.Y., Cha, S.-B., Lim, K., Jung, S.-H.: The relationship between university student learning outcomes and participation in social network services, social acceptance and attitude towards school life. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 45(1), 97–111 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Schnurr, M.A., De Santo, E., Craig, R.: Using a blended learning approach to simulate the negotiation of a multilateral environmental agreement. Int. Stud. Perspect. 14(2), 109–120 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Scott, G., Leritz, L.E., Mumford, M.D.: The effectiveness of creativity training: a quantitative review. Creativity Res. J. 16(4), 361–388 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Segars, A.H., Grover, V.: Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness: a confirmatory factor analysis. MIS Q. 17(4), 517–525 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. So, H.-J., Brush, T.A.: Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: relationships and critical factors. Comput. Educ. 51(1), 318–336 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Vassileva, J.: Toward social learning environments. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 1(4), 199–214 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wu, W., Hwang, L.: The effectiveness of e-learning for blended courses in colleges: a multi-level empirical study. Int. J. Electron. Manage. 8(4), 312–322 (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information SystemsCity University of Hong KongKowloon TongHong Kong, China
  2. 2.College of BusinessWest Texas A&M UniversityTexasUSA

Personalised recommendations