Advertisement

A Study of the Uses of Instant Messaging in the Government Offices

A Case of the Macau Government Offices
  • Rachael K. F. IpEmail author
  • Akina K. W. Ho
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9191)

Abstract

In recent decades, the pervasiveness of information and communication technologies (ICTs) has changed the communication patterns of the majority of the Internet users. This phenomenon is further intensified by the popularity of instant messaging (IM) chat. IM-chat has not only impacted on personal social communication, but also has significantly changed the way organizations communicate internally and externally. This study aims at examining the impact of three personal level factors on workplace IM uses and the associated communication satisfaction. Our findings reveal that habit and boundary crossover have positive impact on workplace IM uses and communication inhibition has a positive influence on the relationship between workplace IM uses and the associated communication satisfaction. Based on our findings, implications for research and practices are discussed.

Keywords

Instant messaging Habit Boundary crossover Spiral of silence Communication satisfaction 

References

  1. 1.
    Muchinsky, P.M.: Organizational communication relationships to organizational climate and job satisfaction. Acad. Manage. J. 20(4), 592–607 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pettit, J.D., Goris, J.R., Vaught, B.C.: An examination of organizational communication as a moderator of the relationship between job performance and job satisfaction. J. Bus. Commun. 34(1), 81–98 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Roberts, K.H., O’Reilly, C.A.: Failures in upward communication in organizations; three possible culprits. Acad. Manage. J. 17(2), 205–215 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cooren, F., Kuhn, T., Cornelissen, J.P., Clark, T.: Communication, organizing and organization: an overview and introduction to the special issue. Organ. Stud. 32(9), 1149–1170 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Majchrzak, A., Markus, M.L., Wareham, J.: ICT and societal challenges. MISQ special issue call for papers (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Miller, K.: Organizational Communication: Approaches and Processes. Wadsworth Cengage Learning, Boston (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Robbins, S.P., Judge, T.A.: Organizational Behavior, 15th edn. Pearson Education, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lancaster, S., Yen, D.C., Huang, A.H., Hung, S.Y.: The selection of instant messaging or e-mail: college students’ perspective for computer communication. Inf. Manage. Comput. Secur. 15(1), 5–22 (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Osterman, M.: Instant messaging in the enterprise. Bus. Commun. Rev. 33(1), 59–62 (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Avrahami, D., Hudson, S.E.: Communication characteristics of instant messaging effects and predictions of interpersonal relationships. In: The 2006 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer Support Cooperative Work, pp. 505–514. ACM (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rennecker, J., Godwin, L.: Theorizing the unintended consequences of instant messaging for worker productivity. Sprouts: Working Pap. Inf. Syst. 3(14), 138–168 (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Li, D., Chau, P.Y., Lou, H.: Understanding individual adoption of instant messaging: an empirical investigation. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 6(4), 102–129 (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liyamem, M., Hirt, S.G., Cheung, C.M.: How habit limits the prediction power of intention: the case of information systems continuance. MIS Q. 31(4), 705–737 (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ouellette, J.A., Wood, W.: Habit and intention in everyday life: the multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psychol. Bull. 124(1), 54–74 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Aarts, H., Verplanken, B., Knippenberg, A.: Predicting behavior from actions in the past: repeated decision making or a matter of habit? J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 28(15), 1355–1374 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Aarts, H., Dijksterhuis, A.P.: The automatic activation of goal-directed behavior: the case of travel habit. J. Environ. Psychol. 20(1), 75–82 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Clarks, S.C.: Work/family border theory: a new theory of work/family balance. Hum. Relat. 53(6), 747–770 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Matthews, R.A., Barnes-Farrell, J.L., Bulger, C.A.: Advancing measurement of work and family domain boundary characteristics. J. Vocat. Behav. 77(3), 447–460 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ashforth, B.E., Kreiner, G.E., Fugate, M.: All in a day’s work: boundaries and micro role transitions. Acad. Manage. Rev. 25(3), 472–491 (2000)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Greenhaus, J.H., Collins, K.M., Shaw, J.D.: The relation between work-family balance and quality of life. J. Vocat. Behav. 63(3), 510–531 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kossek, E.E., Lautsch, B.A., Eaton, S.C.: Telecommuting, control, and boundary management: correlates of policy use and practice, job control, and work-family effectiveness. J. Vocat. Behav. 68(2), 347–367 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Senarathne Tennakoon, K.L., Da Silveira, G.J., Taras, D.G.: Drivers of context-specific ICT use across work and non-work domains: a boundary theory perspective, information and organization. Inf. Organ. 23(2), 107–128 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Downs, C.W., Hazen, M.D.: A factor analytic study of communication satisfaction. J. Bus. Commun. 14(3), 63–73 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gregson, T.: Communication satisfaction; a path analytic study of accountant affiliated with CPA firms. Behav. Res. Acc. 2, 32–49 (1990)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hecht, M.L.: Toward a conceptualization of communication satisfaction. Q. J. Speech 64(1), 47–62 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Clampitt, P.G., Downs, C.W.: Employee perceptions of the relationship between communication and productivity: a field study. J. Bus. Commun. 30(1), 5–28 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Flanagin, A.J.: IM online: instant messaging use among college students. Commun. Res. Rep. 22(3), 175–187 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Griffin, E.A., McClish, G.A.: A First Look at Communication Theory, 8th edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Noelle-Neumann, E.: The spiral of silence: a theory of public opinion. J. Commun. 24(2), 43–51 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hayes, A.F., Glynn, C.J., Shanahan, J.: Willingness to self-censor: a construct and measurement tool for public opinion research. Int. J. Pub. Opin. Res. 17(3), 298–323 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Janis, I.L.: Groupthink. Psychol. Today Mag. 5, 84–90 (1971)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Liu, X., Fahmy, S.: Exploring the spiral of silence in the virtual world: individuals’ willingness to express personal opinions in online versus offline settings. J. Media Commun. Stud. 3(2), 45–57 (2011)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Xu, B., Zhang, W., Li, D.: Copresence and its social-relational antecedents in computer-mediated communication: the case of instant messenger. Inter. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 27(10), 991–1009 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Spector, P.E.: Measurement of human service staff satisfaction: development of the job satisfaction survey. Am. J. Community Psychol. 13(6), 693–713 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Dhammika, K.A.S., Almad, F.B., Sam, T.L.: Job satisfaction, commitment and performance: testing the goodness of measures of three employee outcomes. South Asian J. Manage. 19(2), 7 (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of BusinessMacau University of Science and TechnologyMacauChina

Personalised recommendations